Article

Free access

Using version control data to evaluate the impact of software tools

Authors:

David Atkins,

Thomas Ball,

Todd Graves,

Audris MockusAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '99: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering

Pages 324 - 333

https://doi.org/10.1145/302405.302649

Published: 16 May 1999 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

A. J. Albrecht and J. R. Gaffney. Software function, source lines of code, and development effort prediction: a software science validation. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 9(6):638-648, 1983.

Google Scholar

[2]

D. L. Atkins. Version sensitive editing: Change history as a programming tool. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Software Configuration Management (SCM-g), pages 146-157. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1439,1998.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

V. Basili and R. Reiter. An investigation of human factors in software development. IEEE Computer, 12(12):21-38, December 1979.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

B. Boehm. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, 1981.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

A. Brown and K. Wallnau. A framework for evaluating software technology. IEEE Software, pages 39-49, September 1996.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

T. Bruckhaus, N. Madhavji, I. Janssen, and J. Henshaw. The impact of tools on software productivity. IEEE Software, pages 29-38, September 1996.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

J. 0. Coplien, D. L. DeBruler, and M. B. Thompson. The delta system: A nontraditional approach to software version management. In International Switching Symposium, March 1987.

Google Scholar

[8]

B. Curtis. Substantiating programmer variability. In Proceedings of the IEEE 69, July 1981.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

H. Gottfried and M. Burnett. Programming complex objects in spreadsheets: An empirical study comparing textual formula entry with direct manipulation and gestures. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programming. Ablex Publishing Co., 1997.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

T. L. Graves and A. Mockus. Inferring change effort from configuration management data. In Metrics 98: Fifth International Symposium on Software Metrics, pages 267-273, Bethesda, Maryland, November 1998.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

T. L. Graves and A. Mockus. Identifying productivity drivers by modeling work units using partial data. Technometrics, 1999. submitted.

Google Scholar

[12]

B. Kitchenham, L. Pickard, and S. L. Pfleeger. Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software, pages 52-62, July 1995.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

A. Lawrence, A. Badre, and .J. Stasko. Empirically evaluating the use of animations to teach algorithms. In Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 48-54, October 1994.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[14]

J. Lyle and M. Weiser. Experiments on slicingbased debugging tools. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programming, (June 1986). Ablex Publishing Co., 1986.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

P. McCullagh and J. A. Nelder. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1989.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[16]

A. K. Midha. Software configuration management for the 2Ist century. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 2(l), Winter 1997.

Google Scholar

[17]

A. Mockus and L. G. Votta. Identifying reasons for software changes using historic databases. Submitted to ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology.

Google Scholar

[18]

V. Mosley. How to assess tools efficiently and quantitatively. IEEE Software, pages 29-32, May 1992.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

T. Omerod and L. Ball. An empirical evaluation of TEd, a techniques editor for prolog programming. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programming. Ablex Publishing Co., 1996.

Google Scholar

[20]

A. Pal and M. Thompson. An advanced interface to a switching software version management system. In Seventh International Conference on Software Engineering for Telecommunications Switching Systems, July 1989.

Google Scholar

[21]

R. Poston and M. Sexton. Evaluating and selecting testing tools. IEEE Software, pages 33-42, May 1992.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

M. Rochkind. The source code control system. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 1(4):364- 370, 1975.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

M. Shepperd and C. Schofield. Estimating software project effort using analogies. IEEE fians. on Software Engineering, 23(12):736-743, November 1997.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

B. Shneiderman. Designing the User Interface (2nd Edition). Addison-Wesley, 1991.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

G. Snelting. Reengineering of configurations based on mathematical concept analysis. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(2):146-189, April 1996.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[26]

E. B. Swanson. The dimensions of maintenance. In 2nd Conf. on Software Engineering, pages 492-497, San Francisco, California, 1976.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Fatema KSyeed MHammouda I(2021)Demography of Open Source Software Prediction Models and TechniquesResearch Anthology on Usage and Development of Open Source Software10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch033(620-652)Online publication date: 2021
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch033
Fatema KSyeed MHammouda I(2018)Demography of Open Source Software Prediction Models and TechniquesOptimizing Contemporary Application and Processes in Open Source Software10.4018/978-1-5225-5314-4.ch002(24-56)Online publication date: 2018
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5314-4.ch002
Aram MKoch SNeumann G(2017)Long-Term Analysis of the Development of the Open ACS Community FrameworkOpen Source Solutions for Knowledge Management and Technological Ecosystems10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9.ch005(111-145)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9.ch005
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Using version control data to evaluate the impact of software tools
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Software management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Software configuration management and version control systems

Recommendations

Using version control data to evaluate the impact of software tools: a case study of the version editor

Software tools can improve the quality and maintainability of software, but are expensive to acquire, deploy, and maintain, especially in large organizations. We explore how to quantify the effects of a software tool once it has been deployed in a ...
Assessing the potentials of CASE-tools in software process improvement: a benchmarking study
SAST '96: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools (SAST '96)

CASE tools have been thought as one of the most important means for implementing the derived quality programs. Two basic questions should be answered to find the right CASE tool: what attributes the CASE tools should exhibit and how the existing tools ...
Meta-Modeling Based Version Control System for Software Diagrams

In iterative software development methodology, a version control system is used in order to record and manage modification histories of products such as source codes and models described in diagrams. However, conventional version control systems cannot ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICSE '99: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering

May 1999

741 pages

ISBN:1581130740

DOI:10.1145/302405

Chairmen:
Barry Boehm
Univ. of Southern Califoria, Los Angeles
,
David Garlan
Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
,
Jeff Kramer
Imperial College, London, UK

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 May 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

ICSE99

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN
SIGAda
SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS
IEEE-CS\TCSE

ICSE99: 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering

May 16 - 22, 1999

California, Los Angeles, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

21
Total Citations
View Citations
916
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)75
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Fatema KSyeed MHammouda I(2021)Demography of Open Source Software Prediction Models and TechniquesResearch Anthology on Usage and Development of Open Source Software10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch033(620-652)Online publication date: 2021
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch033
Fatema KSyeed MHammouda I(2018)Demography of Open Source Software Prediction Models and TechniquesOptimizing Contemporary Application and Processes in Open Source Software10.4018/978-1-5225-5314-4.ch002(24-56)Online publication date: 2018
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5314-4.ch002
Aram MKoch SNeumann G(2017)Long-Term Analysis of the Development of the Open ACS Community FrameworkOpen Source Solutions for Knowledge Management and Technological Ecosystems10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9.ch005(111-145)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9.ch005
Koch SMitteregger K(2016)Linking customisation of ERP systems to support effortEnterprise Information Systems10.1080/17517575.2014.91770510:1(81-107)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1080/17517575.2014.917705
Syeed MHammouda I(2014)Socio-Technical Dependencies in Forked OSS Projects: Evidence from the BSD FamilyJournal of Software10.4304/jsw.9.11.2895-29099:11Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014
https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.9.11.2895-2909
Syeed MHammouda ISystä T(2014)Prediction Models and Techniques for Open Source Software ProjectsInternational Journal of Open Source Software and Processes10.4018/ijossp.20140401015:2(1-39)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/ijossp.2014040101
Ernst NOzkaya INord RDelange JBellomo SGorton I(2013)Understanding the role of constraints on architecturally significant requirements2013 3rd International Workshop on the Twin Peaks of Requirements and Architecture (TwinPeaks)10.1109/TwinPeaks-2.2013.6617353(9-14)Online publication date: Jul-2013
https://doi.org/10.1109/TwinPeaks-2.2013.6617353
Koch S(2011)Organisation of work in Open Source Projects: expended effort and efficiencyRevue d'économie industrielle10.4000/rei.5165(17-38)Online publication date: 2011
https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.5165
Taylor QGiraud-Carrier C(2010)Applications of data mining in software engineeringInternational Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies10.1504/IJDATS.2010.0340582:3(243-257)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1504/IJDATS.2010.034058
Jacob FHou DJablonski PInoue KJarzabek SKoschke RCordy J(2010)Actively comparing clones inside the code editorProceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Clones10.1145/1808901.1808903(9-16)Online publication date: 8-May-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1808901.1808903
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Using version control data to evaluate the impact of software tools: a case study of the version editor

Assessing the potentials of CASE-tools in software process improvement: a benchmarking study

Meta-Modeling Based Version Control System for Software Diagrams