Exploring Factors Influencing Self-Efficacy in Information Security: An Empirical Analysis by Integrating Multiple Theoretical Perspectives in the Context of Using Protective Information Technologies
Pages 207 - 208
Abstract
Self-efficacy in information security (SEIS) is one of the most researched predictors of end user security behavior that hinges on end user acceptance and use of the protective technologies such as anti-virus and anti-spyware. SEIS is also modeled as a mediator between factors affecting SEIS and the end user cybersecurity behavior. However, it is not clearly established in past literature on whether SEIS is better modeled as a predictor or as a mediator. It is stressed in literature that we should find new ways to improve SEIS. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is to empirically investigate what factors influence SEIS, and to examine the relative effect of each theorized factor (including self-efficacy) in increasing information security.
References
[1]
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
[2]
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 5--107). Prentice Hall.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[3]
Bulgurcu, B., Cavusoglu, H., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Information security policy compliance: an empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS quarterly, 34(3), 523--548.
[4]
Claar, C. L., Shields, R. C., Rawlinson, D., & Lupton, R. (2013). College student home computer security adoption. Issues in Information Systems, 14(2).
[5]
Dinev, T., & Hu, Q. (2007). The centrality of awareness in the formation of user behavioral intention toward PIT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(7), 23.
[6]
Furman, S., Theofanos, M. F., Choong, Y. Y., & Stanton, B. (2012). Basing cybersecurity training on user perceptions. IEEE Security and Privacy, 10(2), 40--49.
[7]
Hanus, B., & Wu, Y. A. (2016). Impact of Users' Security Awareness on Desktop Security Behavior: A Protection Motivation Theory Perspective. Information Systems Management, 33(1), 2--16.
[8]
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International journal of technology and design education, 7(1--2), 141--159.
[9]
Rhee, H. S., Kim, C., & Ryu, Y. U. (2009). SEIS: Its influence on end users' information security practice behavior. Computers & Security, 28(8), 816--826.
[10]
Shropshire, J., Warkentin, M., & Sharma, S. (2015). Personality, attitudes, and intentions: predicting initial adoption of information security behavior. computers & security, 49, 177--191.
[11]
Sommestad, T., Hallberg, J., Lundholm, K., & Bengtsson, J. (2014). Variables influencing information security policy compliance: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Information Management & Computer Security, 22(1), 42--75.
[12]
Straub, D. W., & Welke, R. J. (1998). Coping with systems risk: security planning models for management decision making. Mis Quarterly, 441--469.
[13]
Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Mis Quarterly, 381--396.
[14]
Wang, P. A. (2013, June). Assessment of Cybersecurity Knowledge and Behavior: An Anti-phishing Scenario. In International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection (ICIMP).
[15]
Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146--169
Index Terms
- Exploring Factors Influencing Self-Efficacy in Information Security: An Empirical Analysis by Integrating Multiple Theoretical Perspectives in the Context of Using Protective Information Technologies
Recommendations
Exploring biometric technology adoption in a developing country context using the modified UTAUT
Biometric technology BT is a component of information security and person identification. Individual acceptance and adoption of BT is fundamental to successful implementation of BT by organisations. There has been a fairly moderate but improving pace of ...
Investigating Students' Acceptance and Self-Efficacy of E-Learning at Al-Aqsa University Based On TAM Model
The study aimed at investigating the influence of E-learning Self-Efficacy (ELSE) on the acceptance of e-learning by using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). According to the TAM which used as the theoretical basis, both of the Perceived Usefulness (...
Dimensions of self-efficacy in the study of smart phone acceptance
This study focuses on smart phone acceptance in a major delivery service company in Taiwan. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was tested in two different forms, the original and with self-efficacy added. A two-dimensional improvement to the theory of ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2017
220 pages
ISBN:9781450350372
DOI:10.1145/3084381
- Conference Chairs:
- Rajendra K. Bandi,
- Rajiv Kishore,
- Program Chairs:
- Daniel Beimborn,
- Rajeev Sharma,
- Shirish C. Srivastava
Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 June 2017
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Abstract
Conference
SIGMIS-CPR '17
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 189Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)12
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in