[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3084226.3084281acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Defect Triage Meetings: Challenges and Lessons Learned: Extended Abstract

Published: 15 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Defect triaging is a process of determining the relevance, severity, priority and information requisites of a defect, prior to its addition in development backlog. A defect triage meeting is a forum where the triaging of defects takes place. This report describes an industrial experience of conducting defect triage meetings and challenges associated with these meetings. The industrial report narrates the context, challenges, solutions and the lessons identified during the execution of the industrial project. We have found that three major challenges associated with the triage meetings are (i) focusing on relevant aspects i.e. defect triaging, (ii) conflict resolution regarding the validity, priority and quality of defect reports, and (iii) confusion over the delegation of duties. We have provided guidelines that can help in overcoming these challenges and based on the evaluation of these guidelines important lessons are identified and described in this experience report.

References

[1]
Andr Van Der Hoek and Alexander L. Wolf. 2002. Software release management for component-based software. Software: Practice and Experience 33, 1 (2002), 77--98.
[2]
Liang Feng, Leyi Song, Chaofeng Sha, and Xueqing Gong. 2013. Practical Duplicate Bug Reports Detection in a Large Web Development Community. Web Technologies and Applications Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2013), 709--720.
[3]
Brajnik, Giorgio. Using automatic tools in accessibility and usability assurance processes. In ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, pp. 219--234. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
[4]
Kaushik, Nilam, Mazeiar Salehie, Ladan Tahvildari, Sen Li, and Mark Moore. Dynamic prioritization in regression testing. In Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), 2011 IEEE Fourth International Conference on, pp. 135--138. IEEE, 2011.
[5]
Begel, Andrew, and Beth Simon. Struggles of new college graduates in their first software development job. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. Vol. 40. No. 1. ACM, 2008.
[6]
Akila Venkatesan and Zayaraz Gothandapani. 2014. Novel Metrics for Bug Triage. Journal of Software 9, 12 (January 2014).
[7]
Nilam Kaushik, Mehdi Amoui, Ladan Tahvildari, Weining Liu, and Shimin Li. 2013. Defect Prioritization in the Software Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (2013).
[8]
Pearse, Troy, Tracy Freeman, and Paul Oman. Using metrics to manage the endgame of a software project. In Software Metrics Symposium, 1999. Proceedings. Sixth International, pp. 207--215. IEEE, 1999.
[9]
Jaweria Kanwal and Onaiza Maqbool. 2012. Bug Prioritization to Facilitate Bug Report Triage. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 27, 2 (2012), 397--412.
[10]
Ahmed Tamrawi, Tung Thanh Nguyen, Jafar Al Kofahi, and Tien N. Nguyen. 2011. Fuzzy set based automatic bug triaging. Proceeding of the 33rd international conference on Software engineering - ICSE 11 (2011).
[11]
Gerald Bortis and Andre Van Der Hoek. 2013. PorchLight: A tag-based approach to bug triaging. 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (2013).

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EASE '17: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
June 2017
405 pages
ISBN:9781450348041
DOI:10.1145/3084226
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

In-Cooperation

  • School of Computing, BTH: Blekinge Institute of Technology - School of Computing

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 June 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Bug
  2. Defect management
  3. Triage

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EASE'17

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 118
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media