[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3078072.3079755acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

The Haptic Bridge: Towards a Theory for Haptic-Supported Learning

Published: 27 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Haptic force feedback systems are unique in their ability to dynamically render physical representations. Although haptic devices have shown promise for supporting learning, prior work mainly describes results of haptic-supported learning without identifying underlying learning mechanisms. To this end, we designed a haptic-supported learning environment and analyzed four students who used it to make connections between two different mathematical representations of sine and cosine: the unit circle, and their graph on the Cartesian plane. We highlight moments where students made connections between the representations, and identify how the haptic feedback supported these moments of insight. We use this evidence in support of a proposed theoretical and design framework for educational haptics. This framework captures four types of haptic representations, and focuses on one -- the haptic bridge -- that effectively scaffolds sense-making with multiple representations.

References

[1]
M. Angerilli, A. Frisoli, F. Salsedo, S. Marcheschi, and M. Bergamasco. 2001. Haptic simulation of an automotive manual gearshift. In Proceedings 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. ROMAN 2001 (Cat. No.01TH8591). 170--175.
[2]
C. Basdogan, S. De, J. Kim, Manivannan Muniyandi, H. Kim, and M. A. Srinivasan. 2004. Haptics in minimally invasive surgical simulation and training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24, 2 (March 2004), 56--64.
[3]
Daniel Bodemer, Rolf Ploetzner, Inge Feuerlein, and Hans Spada. 2004. The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction 14, 3 (June 2004), 325--341.
[4]
Kira J. Carbonneau, Scott C. Marley, and James P. Selig. 2013. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology 105, 2 (2013), 380--400.
[5]
Ton De Jong and Wouter R. Van Joolingen. 1998. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research 68, 2 (1998), 179--201.
[6]
F. Froebel. 1887. The education of man.(WN Hailmann, Trans.) New York: Appleton. (1887).
[7]
S. Gerofsky, M. Savage, and K E MacLean. 2009. 'Being the graph': Using haptic and kinesthetic interfaces to engage students learning about functions. In the 9th Int'l Conf on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT '09). Metz, France, 5 pages.
[8]
Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 2009. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction publishers.
[9]
E. von Glasersfeld. 2005. Thirty years constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 1, 1 (2005), 9--12.
[10]
Majid H. Koul, Subir K. Saha, and M. Manivannan. 2013. Teaching Mechanism Dynamics using a Haptic Device. In Proceedings of the 1st International and 16th National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms (iNaCoMM2013), IIT Roorkee, India.
[11]
Jill H. Larkin and Herbert A. Simon. 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive science 11, 1 (1987), 65--100.
[12]
K E MacLean. 2008. Foundations of Transparency in Tactile Information Design. IEEE Trans on Haptics 1, 2 (2008), 84--95.
[13]
Richard E. Mayer, Roxana Moreno, Michelle Boire, and Shannon Vagge. 1999. Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of educational psychology 91, 4 (1999), 638.
[14]
Gordon Minaker, Oliver Schneider, Richard Davis, and Karon E. MacLean. 2016. HandsOn: Enabling Embodied, Creative STEM e-learning with Programming-Free Force Feedback. In EuroHaptics Conference. 427--437.
[15]
M. Orta Martinez, J. Campion, T. Gholami, M. K. Rittikaidachar, A. C. Barron, and A. M. Okamura. 2017. Open Source, Modular, Customizable, 3-D Printed Kinesthetic Haptic Devices. In IEEE World Haptics Conference. In Press.
[16]
Melisa Orta Martinez, Tania K. Morimoto, Annalisa T. Taylor, Aaron C. Barron, J. D. Akzl Pultorak, Jeanny Wang, Agnes Calasanz-Kaiser, Richard Lee Davis, Paulo Blikstein, and Allison M. Okamura. 2016. 3-D Printed Haptic Devices for Educational Applications. In IEEE Haptics Symposium. 126--133.
[17]
Orit Parnafes. 2010. When Simple Harmonic Motion is not That Simple: Managing Epistemological Complexity by Using Computer-based Representations. Journal of Science Education and Technology 19, 6 (Dec. 2010), 565--579.
[18]
Orit Parnafes and Andrea Disessa. 2004. Relations between types of reasoning and computational representations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 9, 3 (2004), 251--280.
[19]
Jean Piaget. 1977. The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures.(Trans A. Rosin). Viking.
[20]
Thomas Post. 1981. The role of manipulative materials in the learning of mathematical concepts. Selected issues in mathematics education (1981), 109--131.
[21]
Gery W. Ryan and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field methods 15, 1 (2003), 85--109.
[22]
G. Sankaranarayanan, S. Weghorst, M. Sanner, A. Gillet, and A. Olson. 2003. Role of haptics in teaching structural molecular biology. In 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003. HAPTICS 2003. Proceedings. 363--366.
[23]
Makoto Sato, Xiangning Liu, Jun Murayama, Katsuhito Akahane, and Masaharu Isshiki. 2008. A haptic virtual environment for molecular chemistry education. In Transactions on edutainment I. Springer, 28--39.
[24]
Hasti Seifi and Karon E MacLean. 2017. Haptic Facets: exploiting users' sensemaking schemas as a path to design and personalization. IJHCS (2017), 12.
[25]
Robert S. Siegler. 2006. Microgenetic analyses of learning. (2006).
[26]
Alexei Sourin and Lei Wei. 2009. Visual immersive haptic mathematics. Virtual Reality 13, 4 (Sept. 2009), 221--234.
[27]
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
[28]
Jan van der Meij and Ton de Jong. 2006. Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction 16, 3 (June 2006), 199--212.
[29]
D. Wang, Yuru Zhang, Yuhui Wang, Y. S. Lee, Peijun Lu, and Yong Wang. 2005. Cutting on triangle mesh: local model-based haptic display for dental preparation surgery simulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 6 (Nov. 2005), 671--683.
[30]
Carl E. Wieman, Wendy K. Adams, and Katherine K. Perkins. 2008. PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science 322, 5902 (2008), 682--683.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Haptic Technology: Exploring Its Underexplored Clinical Applications—A Systematic ReviewBiomedicines10.3390/biomedicines1212280212:12(2802)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2024
  • (2024)A Comparative Study of Physical and Haptic Exhibits in an Informal Learning EnvironmentIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2024.336842917:4(557-566)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)Collaborative Machine Learning Model Building with Families Using Co-MLProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3589356(40-51)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children
June 2017
808 pages
ISBN:9781450349215
DOI:10.1145/3078072
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. constructivism
  2. dynamic visualizations
  3. guided discovery
  4. haptic-feedback devices

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

IDC '17
Sponsor:
IDC '17: Interaction Design and Children
June 27 - 30, 2017
California, Stanford, USA

Acceptance Rates

IDC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 25 of 118 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Upcoming Conference

IDC '25
Interaction Design and Children
June 23 - 26, 2025
Reykjavik , Iceland

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)163
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Haptic Technology: Exploring Its Underexplored Clinical Applications—A Systematic ReviewBiomedicines10.3390/biomedicines1212280212:12(2802)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2024
  • (2024)A Comparative Study of Physical and Haptic Exhibits in an Informal Learning EnvironmentIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2024.336842917:4(557-566)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)Collaborative Machine Learning Model Building with Families Using Co-MLProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3589356(40-51)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Embodied preparation for learning basic quantum chemistry: A mixed‐method studyJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1290940:2(715-730)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
  • (2022)‘Release orpheus!’: understanding historical time in a mixed/augmented reality environment through embodied learningEducation 3-1310.1080/03004279.2022.215131752:8(1432-1451)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2022
  • (2021)Designing Pedagogically Effective Haptic Systems for Learning: A ReviewApplied Sciences10.3390/app1114624511:14(6245)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Compressables: A Haptic Prototyping Toolkit for Wearable Compression-based InterfacesProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462057(1101-1114)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
  • (2020)I can feel it moving: Science Communicators Talking About the Potential of Mid-Air HapticsFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2020.5349742Online publication date: 20-Nov-2020
  • (2020)Facilitating Flexible Force Feedback Design with FeelixProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3382507.3418819(184-193)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Enacting Elementary Geometry: Participatory ‘Haptic’ Sense-MakingDigital Experiences in Mathematics Education10.1007/s40751-020-00079-zOnline publication date: 12-Sep-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media