[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2934732.2934751acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesceriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing Interestingness and Importance of Information Retrieval Course Topics in a Course for Three Different Target Groups

Published: 14 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Teaching an information retrieval (IR) course for three different target groups is challenging. These target groups are i) resident students at the University of Bamberg, Germany ii) remote full-time students from other Bavarian universities, and iii) remote but part-time students from all parts of Germany which usually study the course besides their day-to-day work relationship. As a consequence, we have participants with heterogeneous previous knowledge and potentially different expectations with respect to the course content.
In this paper we will only briefly describe the didactic aspects and challenges of the course. The clear focus of the paper lies on an in-depth quantitative evaluation how various IR topics presented in the lectures and tutorials fit the needs of the different target groups. We evaluate interestingness and importance of the course topics according to the students' impressions. The goal of the evaluation is to get hints for future refinements of IR course content---in general but also with respect to the needs of different target groups.

References

[1]
D. Blank, N. Fuhr, A. Henrich, T. Mandl, T. Rölleke, H. Schütze, and B. Stein. Teaching IR: curricular considerations. In Efthimiadis et al. {4}, pages 31--46.
[2]
O. Chapelle, D. Metzler, Y. Zhang, and P. Grinspan. Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '09, pages 621--630, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[3]
B. Croft, D. Metzler, and T. Strohman. Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice. Pearson, International Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 2010.
[4]
E. N. Efthimiadis, J. M. Fernández-Luna, J. F. Huete, and A. MacFarlane, editors. Teaching and Learning in Information Retrieval, volume 31 of The Information Retrieval Series. Springer, 2011.
[5]
M. McCandless, E. Hatcher, and O. Gospodnetic. Lucene in Action. Manning Publications, 2 edition, 2010.
[6]
M. Steyvers and T. Griffiths. Probabilistic Topic Models. Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning., 427(7):424--440, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Datenbanken und Information Retrieval an der Universität BambergDatenbank-Spektrum10.1007/s13222-018-0298-518:3(195-202)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2018
  1. Assessing Interestingness and Importance of Information Retrieval Course Topics in a Course for Three Different Target Groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CERI '16: Proceedings of the 4th Spanish Conference on Information Retrieval
    June 2016
    146 pages
    ISBN:9781450341417
    DOI:10.1145/2934732
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Granada: University of Granada

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Distance Learning
    2. Evaluation of Course Content
    3. Teaching Information Retrieval

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CERI '16

    Acceptance Rates

    CERI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 27 submissions, 67%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 36 of 51 submissions, 71%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)Datenbanken und Information Retrieval an der Universität BambergDatenbank-Spektrum10.1007/s13222-018-0298-518:3(195-202)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media