More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Article

Free access

Type-based analysis of uncaught exceptions

Authors:

François Pessaux,

Xavier LeroyAuthors Info & Claims

POPL '99: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages

Pages 276 - 290

https://doi.org/10.1145/292540.292565

Published: 01 January 1999 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a program analysis to estimate uncaught exceptions in ML programs. This analysis relies on unification-based type inference in a non-standard type system, using rows to approximate both the flow of escaping exceptions (a la effect systems) and the flow of result values (a la control-flow analyses). The resulting analysis is efficient and precise; in particular, arguments carried by exceptions are accurately handled.

References

[1]

H. G. Baker. Unify and conquer (garbage, updating, aliasing, .. ) in functional languages. In Lisp and Functional Programming 1990. ACM Press, 1990.

Digital Library

[2]

M. F~hndrich and A. Aiken. Making set-constraint based program analyses scale. Technical Report 96-917, University of California at Berkeley, Computer Science Division, 1996.

Digital Library

[3]

M. F~hndrich and A. Aiken. Program analysis using mixed term and set constraints. In Static Analysis Symposium '97, number 1302 in LNCS, pages 114-126. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

[4]

M. F~hndrich, J. S. Foster, A. Aiken, and J. Cu. Tracking down exceptions in Standard ML programs. Technical report, University of California at Berkeley, Computer Science Division, 1998.

Digital Library

[5]

M. F~hndrich, J. S. Foster, Z. Su, and A. Aiken. Partial online cycle elimination in inclusion constraint graphs. In Prog. Lang. Design and Impl. 1998, pages 85-96. ACM Press, 1998.

[6]

C. Flanagan and M. Felleisen. Componential set-based analysis. In Prog. Lang. Design and Impl. 1997. ACM Press, 1997.

Digital Library

[7]

T. Freeman and F. Pfenning. Refinement types for ML. In Prog. Lang. Design and Impl. 1991, pages 268-277. ACM Press, 1991.

[8]

J. C. Guzmdn and A. Sudrez. A type system for exceptions. In Proc. 199t workshop on ML and its applications, pages 127-135. Research report 2265, INRIA, 1994.

[9]

N. Heintze. Set-based analysis of ML programs. In Lisp and Functional Programming '9~, pages 306-317. ACM Press, 1994.

[10]

F. Henglein. Global tagging optimization by type inference. in Lisp and Functional Programming 1992. ACM Press, 1992.

Digital Library

[11]

F. Henglein. Type inference with polymorphic recursion. A CM Trans. Prog. Lang. Syst., 15(2):253-289, 1993.

Digital Library

[12]

S. Jagannathan and A. Wright. Polymorphic splitting: An effective polyvariant flow analysis. A CM Trans. Prog. Lang. Syst., 20(1):166-207, 1998.

Digital Library

[13]

A. J. Kfoury, J. Tiuryn, and P. Urzyczyn. Type reconstruction in the presence of polymorphic recursion. A CM Trans. Prog. Lang. Syst., 15(2):290-311, 1993.

Digital Library

[14]

X. Leroy and F. Pessaux. Type-based analysis of uncaught exceptions. Research report 3541, INRIA, Nov. 1998. Extended version of this paper.

[15]

X. Leroy, J. Vouillon, D. Doligez, et al. The Objective Caml system. Software and documentation available on the Web, http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/, 1996.

[16]

J. M. Lucassen and D. K. Cifford. Polyrnorphic effect systems. In 15th syrup. Principles of Progr. Lang., pages 47-57. ACM Press, 1988.

[17]

A. Mycroft. Polymorphic type schemes and recursive definitions. In International Symposium on Programming, number 167 in LNCS, pages 217-228. Springer- Verlag, 1984.

Digital Library

[18]

A. Ohori. A polymorphic record calculus and its compilation. ACM Trans. Prog. Lang. Syst., 17(6):844-895, 1995.

Digital Library

[19]

F. Pottier. A framework for type inference with subtyping. In Int. Conf. on Functional Progr. 1998, pages 228-238. ACM Press, 1996.

Digital Library

[20]

F. Pottier. Type inference in the presence of subtyping: from theory to practice. Research report 3483, INRIA, Sept. 1998.

[21]

D. R~my. Records and variants as a natural extension of ML. In 16th symp. Principles of Progr. Lang., pages 77-88. ACM Press, 1989.

Digital Library

[22]

D. R~my. Syntactic theories and the algebra of record terms. Research report 1869, INRIA, 1993.

[23]

D. R@my. Type inference for records in a natural extension of ML. In C. A. Gunter and J. C. Mitchell, editors, Theoretical Aspects of Object-Oriented Programming. MIT Press, 1993.

[24]

D. R~my and J. Vouillon. Objective ML: A simple object-oriented extension of ML. In 2~th symp. Principles of Progr. Lang., pages 40-53. ACM Press, 1997.

Digital Library

[25]

Z. Shao and A. Appeh Smartest recompilation. In 20th symp. Principles of Progr. Lang., pages 439-450. ACM Press, 1993.

Digital Library

[26]

O. Shivers. Control-Flow Analysis of Higher-Order Languages. PhD thesis CMU-CS-91-145, Carnegie Mellon University, May 1991.

Digital Library

[27]

B. Steensgaard. Points-to analysis in almost linear time. In 23rd syrup. Principles of Progr. Lang., pages 32-41. ACM Press, 1996.

[28]

J.-P. Talpin and P. Jouvelot. The type and effect discipline. Inf. and Comp., 111(2):245-296, 1994.

Digital Library

[29]

M. Torte and L. Birkedal. A region inference algorithm. A CM Trans. Prog. Lang. Syst., 1998. To appear.

Digital Library

[30]

M. Tofte and J.-P. Talpin. Region-based memory management. Inf. and Comp., 132(2):109-176, 1997.

Digital Library

[31]

M. Wand. Complete type inference for simple objects. In Logic in Computer Science 1987, pages 37-44. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987.

[32]

A. K. Wright. Simple imperative polymorphism. Lisp and Symbolic Computation, 8(4):343-356, 1995.

Digital Library

[33]

A. K. Wright and R. Cartwright. A practical soft type system for Scheme. A CM Trans. Prog. Lang. Syst., 19(1):87-152, 1997.

Digital Library

[34]

A. K. Wright and M. Felleisen. A syntactic approach to type soundness. Inf. and Comp., 115(1):38-94, 1994.

Digital Library

[35]

K. Yi. An abstract interpretation for estimating uncaught exceptions in Standard ML programs. Sci. Cornput. Programming, 31(1):147-173, 1998.

Digital Library

[36]

K. Yi and S. Ryu. Towards a cost-effective estimation of uncaught exceptions in SML programs. In Static Analysis Symposium '97, number 1302 in LNCS, pages 98-113. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

Cited By

Elsman M(2024)Explicit Effects and Effect Constraints in ReMLProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36329218:POPL(2370-2394)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632921
Lermusiaux PMontagu B(2024)Detection of Uncaught Exceptions in Functional Programs by Abstract InterpretationProgramming Languages and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-57267-8_15(391-420)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-57267-8_15
Odersky MBoruch-Gruszecki ABrachthäuser JLee ELhoták ORichard-Foy JDoeraene S(2021)Safer exceptions for ScalaProceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Scala10.1145/3486610.3486893(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3486610.3486893
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Type-based analysis of uncaught exceptions

Recommendations

Type-based analysis of uncaught exceptions

This article presents a program analysis to estimate uncaught exceptions in ML programs. This analysis relies on unification-based type inference in a nonstandard type system, using rows to approximate both the flow of escaping exceptions (a la effect ...
Detection of Uncaught Exceptions in Functional Programs by Abstract Interpretation
Programming Languages and Systems
Abstract
Exception handling is a key feature in modern programming languages. Exceptions can be used to deal with errors, or as a means to control the flow of execution of a program. Since they might unexpectedly terminate a program, unhandled exceptions ...
Estimating Uncaught Exceptions in Standard ML Programs from Type-Based Equations
COMPSAC '96: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Computer Software and Applications

We present a static analysis that detects potential runtime exceptions that are raised and never handled inside Standard ML (SML) programs. Contrary to our earlier method (based on abstract interpretation) where the input program's control flow is ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

POPL '99: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages

January 1999

324 pages

ISBN:1581130953

DOI:10.1145/292540

Chairmen:
Andrew Appel
Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ
,
Alex Aiken
Univ. of California, Berkeley

Copyright © 1999 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

POPL99

Sponsor:

POPL99: Symposium on Prinicples of Programming Languages 1999

January 20 - 22, 1999

Texas, San Antonio, USA

Acceptance Rates

POPL '99 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 136 submissions, 18%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 824 of 4,130 submissions, 20%

Upcoming Conference

POPL '25

Sponsor:
sigplan

The 52nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

January 19 - 25, 2025

Denver , CO , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

30
Total Citations
View Citations
519
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)90
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)70

Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Elsman M(2024)Explicit Effects and Effect Constraints in ReMLProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36329218:POPL(2370-2394)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632921
Lermusiaux PMontagu B(2024)Detection of Uncaught Exceptions in Functional Programs by Abstract InterpretationProgramming Languages and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-57267-8_15(391-420)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-57267-8_15
Odersky MBoruch-Gruszecki ABrachthäuser JLee ELhoták ORichard-Foy JDoeraene S(2021)Safer exceptions for ScalaProceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Scala10.1145/3486610.3486893(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3486610.3486893
Hardin TJaume MPessaux FDonzeau‐Gouge V(2021)ReferencesConcepts and Semantics of Programming Languages 110.1002/9781119824121.refs(293-294)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119824121.refs
Benton NHofmann MNigam VCheney JVidal G(2016)Effect-dependent transformations for concurrent programsProceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming10.1145/2967973.2968602(188-201)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2967973.2968602
Thiemann PFennell L(2014)Gradual Typing for Annotated Type SystemsProceedings of the 23rd European Symposium on Programming Languages and Systems - Volume 841010.1007/978-3-642-54833-8_4(47-66)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-54833-8_4
Lebresne S(2009)A Type System For Call-By-Name ExceptionsLogical Methods in Computer Science10.2168/LMCS-5(4:1)20095:4Online publication date: 2-Nov-2009
https://doi.org/10.2168/LMCS-5(4:1)2009
David CGherghina CChin WPuebla GVidal G(2009)Translation and optimization for a core calculus with exceptionsProceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Partial evaluation and program manipulation10.1145/1480945.1480952(41-50)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1480945.1480952
Lebresne S(2008)A System F with Call-by-Name ExceptionsProceedings of the 35th international colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Part II10.1007/978-3-540-70583-3_27(323-335)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-540-70583-3_27
Dillig IDillig TAiken A(2007)Static error detection using semantic inconsistency inferenceACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/1273442.125078442:6(435-445)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2007
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1273442.1250784
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents