More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Technologies for popular participation: a research agenda

Authors:

Cristiano Maciel,

Claudia Cappelli,

Cleyton Slaviero,

Ana Cristina Bicharra GarciaAuthors Info & Claims

dg.o '16: Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research

Pages 202 - 211

https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912191

Published: 08 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The development of environments that promote electronic participation (e-Participation) by citizens in government issues is a challenge that requires robust and wide-ranging architectures and methodologies as well as the construction of an effective infrastructure that stimulates and supports citizen's participation. Also, the incentive for an education that leads citizens to participate in public life, with transparent information and technologically mediated engagement is a challenge. Faced with these issues, we propose a discussion and further research and practice in relation to this topic as part of the Great Challenges of the Brazilian Computing Society.

References

[1]

Araujo, R.; Cappelli, C.; Diirr, B.; Engiel, P.; Tavares, R. L.; 2011. Democracia Eletrônica. In: Pimentel, M.;Fuks, H. (Eds.). Sistemas Colaborativos. 1. ed.: Elsevier. p. 110--121.

[2]

Baranauskas, C., Souza, C. S. de; Pereira, R. (Org.). 2014. I GranDIHC-BR - Grandes Desafios de Pesquisa em Interação Humano-Computador no Brasil. Technical Report. Comissão Especial de Interação Humano-Computador (CEIHC) da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC). 56 p.

[3]

CD. e-Democracia. 2014. Available at: <http://edemocracia.camara.gov.br/o-que-e>. Accessed September 14th, 2014.

[4]

Cappelli, C. 2009. Uma Abordagem para Transparência em Processos Organizacionais Utilizando Aspectos. Doctoral Thesis.: PUC-Rio.

[5]

Cappelli, C., Engiel, P., Araujo, R.M., Leite, J.C.S.P. 2013. Managing Transparency Guided by a Maturity Model. 3rd Global Conference on Transparency Research HEC PARIS.

[6]

DELIB. 2012. Delib - A digital Democracy Company. Available at: http://www.delib.net. Accessed in August 10th, 2012.

[7]

De Mendonça, P.G.A.; Maciel, C.; Viterbo, J. 2014. Visualizing infestation in urban areas. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research - dg.o '14. New York: ACM Press, 2014. p. 186--191.

Digital Library

[8]

Dirr, B. Aaraujo, R.M., Cappelli, C. 2011. Talking about Public Service Processes. In ePart 2011: 252--261.

Digital Library

[9]

Engiel, P. 2012. Projetando o Entendimento de Modelos de Processos de Prestação de Serviços Públicos. Master's Dissertation: Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

[10]

Franca, T.; Oliveira, J. 2014. Análise de Sentimento de Tweets Relacionados aos Protestos que ocorreram no Brasil entre Junho e Agosto de 2013. In III Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining (BraSNAM), 2014, Brasilia. Anais do Congresso da SociedadeBrasileira de Computação. Porto Alegre: SBC.

[11]

GOV2U. Gov2DemoSS. 2012. Available at: http://www.gov2demoss.org. Acessed in August 10th, 2012.

[12]

GOV2U. We-gov Project. 2012. Available at: <http://www.wegov-project.eu. Accessed in August 10th. 2012.

[13]

Islam, M.S. 2008. Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. European Journal of ePractice, v. 5, p. 1--12, 2008.

[14]

Maciel, C. 2008. Um método para mensurar o grau de maturidade na tomada de decisão e-Democrática. Doctoral Thesis. Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, 2008.

[15]

Maciel, C.; Roque, L.; Garcia, A. C. B. 2011. E-Democracy: Concepts, Experiences and Challenges. In Herrmann, P. (Ed.). Democracy in Theory and Action. 1. ed. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2011. v. 8p. 51--92.

[16]

Maciel, C.; Viterbo, J.; Breitman, K., 2012. Transparência Pública e Dados Abertos Governamentais. In: André Resende. (Org.). Governo Brasileiro no Futuro: sugestões e desafios para o Estado (2012--2022). 1ed. São Paulo: Cubzac, 2012, p. 47--56.

[17]

Macintosh, A.; Coleman, S.; Schneeberger, A. 2009. e-Participation: The Research Gaps. In First International Conference on Electronic Participation (ePart'09). Springer, 2009.

Digital Library

[18]

Mambrey, P. 2008. From participation to e-participation: the German case. In Anais of 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM. 2008.

Digital Library

[19]

Modelo de Maturidade em Transparência Organizacional -- (2105). https://sites.google.com/site/ciberdem/modelo-de-maturidade-em-transparncia-organizacional

[20]

Muriana, L.M., Maciel, C., Garcia, A.C.B. 2013. Do Facebook às Ruas -- Comunidades em Interação. In Anais do WAIHCWS 2013: 39--50.

[21]

Norris, D. F. 2010. E-government... not e-governance... not e-democracy not now! Not Ever? In Anais do 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '10. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010.

Digital Library

[22]

OECD. 2014. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Disponível em: <http://www.oecd.org>. Accessed in May 10th, 2014.

[23]

Oliveira, L.K.B., Maciel, C. 2013. Transparency and Social Control via the Citizen s Portal: A Case Study with the Use of Triangulation. In Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 8061, p. 112--124, 2013.

Digital Library

[24]

Panopoulou, E.; Tambouris, E.; Tarabanis, K. 2009. e-Participation initiatives: How is Europe progressing. European Journal of ePractice, v. 7, n. March, p. 15--26, 2009.

[25]

Phang, C.W.; Kankanhalli, A., 2008. A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, v. 51, n. 12, p. 128, 1 dez 2008.

Digital Library

[26]

Pinheiro, A., Cappelli, C., Maciel, C. 2008. Increasing Information Auditability for Social Network Users. In HCII (12) 2014, p. 536--547.

[27]

PMRJ. 2010. Sistema de Ouvidoria da Prefeitura da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Available at: http://www21.rio.rj.gov.br/siso/internet/ouvidoria.htm>. Accessed in August 10th, 2010.

[28]

PPB. 2012. Petição Pública Brasil. Avialable at: http://www.peticaopublica.com.br. Accessed: August 10th, 2012.

[29]

Pratchett, L. 2007. Where we are: e-Consultation/e-Deliberation. In: Electronic Democracy: Achievements and Challenges, European Science Foundation - LiU Conference. Vadstena, Sweden, Nov 2007. Available at: http://www.docs.ifib.de/esfconference07/conf_programme.html. Acessed Jan 10th, 2008.

[30]

Prefeitura de Cuiabá. 2011. Available at: http://www.cuiaba.mt.gov.br. Acessed: November 23th, 2011.

[31]

Rowe, G.; Frewer, L. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 25, Winter, p.3--29, 2000.

[32]

Rowe, G.; Frewer, L. J. 2005. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 30, n. 2, p. 251--290, 2005.

[33]

Saebo, Ø.; Rose, J.; Flack, L.S. 2008. The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, v. 25, n. 3, p. 400--428,2008.

[34]

SBC. 2006. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação. Grandes Desafios da Pesquisa em Computação no Brasil 2006-2016. Available at: <http://www.sbc.org.br/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&Itemid=195&task=view.download&catid=50&cid=11>&task=view.download&catid=50&cid=11>&catid=50&cid=11>&cid=11>>. Accessed in August 10th, 2014.

[35]

SEVA. 2014. Cidade Democrática. Available at: <http://www.cidadedemocratica.org.br/>. Accessed September 14th, 2014.

[36]

Shorr, H.; Stolfo, S. J. 1998. A Digital Government for the 21st Century. Comunications of the ACM, v. 41, n. 11, p. 15--19, 1998.

Digital Library

[37]

Matheus, R.; Ribeiro, M.M; Vaz, J.C; and de Souza, C.A. 2010. Case studies of digital participatory budgeting in Latin America: models for citizen engagement. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV '10), Jim DAVIES and Tomasz JANOWSKI (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--36.

Digital Library

[38]

Slaviero, C., Garcia, A.C.B., Maciel, C. (2012). Exploiting e-Participation using an Ontological Approach. ePart 2012: 144--155.

[39]

Slaviero, C. 2012. Um método para modelagem de ambientes e-participativos baseado em ontologia. Dissertação (Mestrado em Computação) - Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ:. 133 f.

[40]

SPGPC. (2012) Portal da Participação. Available at: http://www.participa.rs.gov.br Accessed in: Aug 4th, 2012.

[41]

Staiou, E.R.; Gouscos, D. 2010. Socializing E-governance: A Parallel Study of Participatory E-governance and Emerging Social Media. Integrated Series in Information Systems, v. 25, n. 3, p. 543--559.

[42]

Tambouris, E.; Liotas, N.; Taranabis, Konstantinos. 2007. A Framework for assessing e-Participation Projects and Tools. (Hawaii, Ed.) In 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE.

Digital Library

[43]

UKCOD. 2014. MySociety. Available at https://www.mysociety.org/. Accessed August 18th, 2014.

[44]

UNPAN. 2014. United Nations. UN Global EGovernment Readiness Report 2005: From E-government to E-Inclusion. United Nations Publications, 2014. Available at <http://www.unpan.org/>. Accessed Sept 25th, 2014.

[45]

Velikanov, C. 2010. Requirements and tools for an efficient eParticipation. In 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities (dg.o).

Digital Library

[46]

WEBCITIZEN. 2012. VOTENAWEB Projetos de Lei. Available at: <http://www.votenaweb.com.br/>. Accessed: Aug 10th, 2012.

[47]

Wimmer, M.A. 2007. Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre. In 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '07. Macau, China: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[48]

Mach, M.; Cizmarik, T.; Dridi, F.; Furdik, K.; Gilberg, J.; Hreno, J.; Hudak, S.; Kende, R.; Lumtzer, M.; Macej, P.; Novacek, E.; Palola, I.; Sabol, T.; Sansom, N.; Thomson, P. 2003. Webocracy -- edited annual report for publication. Technical report, Information Society Technologies.

[49]

Monnoyer-Smith, L. 2005. Is deliberation on the Internet a democratic improvement for a better governance? On-line Deliberation-DIAC 2005, Stanford University, p. 20-- 22.

[50]

Kavanaugh, A.; Isenhour, P.; Cooper, M.; Carrol, J. M.; Rososn, M. B.; Schimtz, J. 2005. Information Technology in Support of Public Deliberation. In: In: Proceeding of the Communities and Technologies II, Holanda: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[51]

Wornex. Delphi online mediation system. 2002. Available at: http://www.wornex.com/content/view/16/83/>. Accessed in December 15th, 2015.

[52]

Rodriguez, M. A.; Steinbock, D. J.; Watkins, J. H.; Gerhenson, C.; Bollen, J.; Grey, V.; Degraf, B. 2007. Smartocracy: Social Networks for Collective Decision Making. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSC-40), 40, Havaí, Estados Unidos: IEEE, 2007.

Digital Library

[53]

Nogueira, J. L.; GARCIA, A. C. B.; CORREIA, L., e-Citizen interacting with virtual government institutions. In: EPIA 2007 - 13° Encontro Português de Inteligência Artificial, 2007. p. 692--703.

[54]

Mark Klein: The Mit Deliberatorium - Enabling Large-scale Deliberation about Complex Systemic Problems. ICAART (1) 2011: 15--24

[55]

GARCIA, A. C. B.; KLEIN, M., Making sense of large-group discussions using rhetorically structured text. In: SOTICS 2015 - The Fifth International Conference on Social Media Technologies, Communication, and Informatics, 2015, Barcelona.

[56]

Garcia, A. C. B., Maciel, C., Pinto, F. B. (2005). A quality inspection method to evaluate e-government sites. In Electronic government (pp. 198--209). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Digital Library

[57]

Maciel, C., Roque, L., Garcia, A.C.B. 2009. Democratic citizenship community: a social network to promote e-deliberative process. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government (dg.o '09), Soon Ae Chun, Rodrigo Sandoval, and Priscilla Regan (Eds.). Digital Government Society of North America 25--34.

Digital Library

[58]

Maciel, C., Garcia, A. C. B. (2007). Design and Metrics of a 'Democratic Citizenship Community'in Support of Deliberative Decision-Making. In Electronic Government (pp. 388--400). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Digital Library

[59]

Lage, R. Visualizações para apoiar o acompanhamento de discussões políticas. 2012. Available at: http://www2.uniriotec.br/ppgi/banco-de-dissertacoes-ppgi-unirio/2012/visualizacoes-para-apoiar-o-acompanhamento-de-discussoes-politicas/view. Accessed in April 15th, 2016.

[60]

Salgado, A.C., Motta, C.L.R. da; Santoro, F.M. (Org.). Grandes desafios da computação no Brasil: relatos do 3° seminário. 1&acy; ed., Porto Alegre. SBC, 2015, 304p.

[61]

Maciel, C.; Cappelli, C.; Slaviero, C. Participação Popular e Tecnologias: Experiências e Desafio. In: Salgado, A.C., Motta, C.L.R. da; Santoro, F.M. (Org.). Grandes desafios da computação no Brasil: relatos do 3° seminário. 1&acy; ed., Porto Alegre. SBC, 2015, p. 252--272.

Cited By

Zahn JViterbo JMaciel CBernardini F(2024)A Framework for Implanting Citizen-Sourcing Platforms in Municipal Ombudsman OfficesProceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3657054.3657118(542-554)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657054.3657118
Filgueiras FJunquilho T(2023)The Brazilian (Non)perspective on national strategy for artificial intelligenceDiscover Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s44163-023-00052-w3:1Online publication date: 20-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00052-w
Nobre GFerreira KSilva IBarbosa G(2022)Using Twitter to Characterize Public Opinion in Brazil During Political EventsResearch Anthology on Social Media's Influence on Government, Politics, and Social Movements10.4018/978-1-6684-7472-3.ch028(585-598)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7472-3.ch028
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

A tool for liberty or oppression? A cross-national study of the Internets influence on democracy

This study tackles the inquiry of whether the Internet is a tool for democracy or oppression.E-participation did not significantly mediate political evolution from electoral democracy to liberal democracy.Online filtering or censorship significantly ...
e-Participation and Decision Analysis

Decision analytic methods are being increasingly used to help to articulate and structure debate and deliberations among citizens and stakeholders in societal decisions. Methods vary, but, essentially, a public authority or agency, when faced with a ...
e-government... not e-governance... not e-democracy not now!: not ever?
ICEGOV '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

The argument that I offer in this paper, supported by literature and empirical evidence, is that e-government is just that -- electronic government -- and little more. I define e-government as the delivery by alternate, electronic means of governmental ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

dg.o '16: Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research

June 2016

532 pages

ISBN:9781450343398

DOI:10.1145/2912160

Editors:
Yushim Kim,
Monica Liu

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o '16

dg.o '16: 17th International Digital Government Research Conference

June 8 - 10, 2016

Shanghai, China

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
175
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zahn JViterbo JMaciel CBernardini F(2024)A Framework for Implanting Citizen-Sourcing Platforms in Municipal Ombudsman OfficesProceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3657054.3657118(542-554)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657054.3657118
Filgueiras FJunquilho T(2023)The Brazilian (Non)perspective on national strategy for artificial intelligenceDiscover Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s44163-023-00052-w3:1Online publication date: 20-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00052-w
Nobre GFerreira KSilva IBarbosa G(2022)Using Twitter to Characterize Public Opinion in Brazil During Political EventsResearch Anthology on Social Media's Influence on Government, Politics, and Social Movements10.4018/978-1-6684-7472-3.ch028(585-598)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7472-3.ch028
Gorkovenko KLischke LWoźniak PBratteteig TSandnes FBerget G(2018)Large displays and tabletsProceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3240167.3240192(664-675)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3240167.3240192
Peres Nobre GMarques Ferreira KSilva IBarbosa G(2018)Characterization of Public Opinion on Political Events in Brazil Based on Twitter DataCollaboration and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-99504-5_9(105-116)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99504-5_9
da Silva Cruz WMaciel Cde Castilho FGirata N(2016)A Method of Inspecting and Applying Open Government Data in the Auditing Courts of Brazilian StatesElectronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective10.1007/978-3-319-44159-7_19(261-275)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44159-7_19

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents