[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2908961.2931733acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Optimized Feed-forward Artificial Neural Network Topology to Support Radiologists in Breast Lesions Classification

Published: 20 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Computer Aided Decision (CAD) systems based on Medical Imaging could support radiologists in classifying malignant regions from benign ones, in the field of investigation for breast cancer detection. This decision may often follow a previous procedure dedicated to the earlier identification of Regions Of Interest (ROI) containing still unclassified lesions.
Materials and methods: Materials comprise features extracted from magnetic resonance (MR) images representing morphological properties of lesions. The Regions Of Interest identified by a previous automatic procedure validated by radiologists of the University of Bari Aldo Moro (Italy), authors of this work, 134 from 600 slices considered of interest, because they contain still unclassified damaged areas. Several techniques were tested for ROI segmentation and classification. In particular, it can be shown that the same procedures for lesioned-area discrimination were also useful for malignancy classification of lesions, themselves. In particular, MR images were processed with different image processing techniques for ROI extraction, which were, ultimately, described by morphological features, such as circularity, aspect ratio, solidity and convexity. Finally, we discuss a procedure to design a feed-forward supervised artificial neural networks (ANN) architecture based on an evolutionary strategy. In a similar approach, different ANN topologies were tested in order to find the best in terms of mean accuracy for several iterations of training, validation and test. In particular, for each topology, the training, validation and test sets were constructed using 100 random permutations of the dataset, from which the average performances were calculated.
Results: The performance of the best ANN architecture, trained using a training set of 82 samples (equally divided between malignant and benign lesions) from the 134 samples available in the whole dataset, were evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusion: Testing determined that the supervised ANN approach is consistent and reveals good performance; in particular, the optimal ANN topology found through an evolutionary strategy showed high generalization on the mean performance indexes regardless of training, validation and test sets applied, showing good performances in terms of both accuracy and sensitivity, permitting correct classification of the true malignant lesions.

References

[1]
US Cancer Statistics Working Group et al. United states cancer statistics: 1999--2010 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, 2013.
[2]
William H Wolberg, W Nick Street, and Olvi L Mangasarian. Image analysis and machine learning applied to breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Analytical and Quantitative cytology and histology, 17(2):77--87, 1995.
[3]
William H Wolberg, W Nick Street, and Olvi L Mangasarian. Breast cytology diagnosis via digital image analysis. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, 15(6):396--404, 1993.
[4]
Vitoantonio Bevilacqua. Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy for automatic polyps detection by artificial neural network approach: New tests on an enlarged cohort of polyps. Neurocomputing, 116:62--75, 2013.
[5]
Olvi L Mangasarian, W Nick Street, and William H Wolberg. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43(4):570--577, 1995.
[6]
Vitoantonio Bevilacqua, Giuseppe Mastronardi, and Filippo Menolascina. Hybrid data analysis methods and artificial neural network design in breast cancer diagnosis: Idest experience. In Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation, 2005 and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce, International Conference on, volume 2, pages 373--378. IEEE, 2005.
[7]
William H Wolberg, W Nick Street, Dennis M Heisey, and Olvi L Mangasarian. Computer-derived nuclear features distinguish malignant from benign breast cytology. Human Pathology, 26(7):792--796, 1995.
[8]
Vitoantonio Bevilacqua, Giuseppe Mastronardi, Filippo Menolascina, Paolo Pannarale, and Antonio Pedone. A novel multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to artificial neural network topology optimisation: the breast cancer classification problem. In Neural Networks, 2006. IJCNN'06. International Joint Conference on, pages 1958--1965. IEEE, 2006.
[9]
Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner and Richard W Katzberg. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Investigative radiology, 29(1):94--104, 1994.
[10]
Susan G Orel, Mitchell D Schnall, Virginia A LiVolsi, and Rosalind H Troupin. Suspicious breast lesions: Mr imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology, 190(2):485--493, 1994.
[11]
Wei Huang, Paul R Fisher, Khaldoon Dulaimy, Luminita A Tudorica, Brian O'Hea, and Terry M Button. Detection of breast malignancy: Diagnostic mr protocol for improved specificity 1. Radiology, 232(2):585--591, 2004.
[12]
CK Kuhl. Mri of breast tumors. European radiology, 10(1):46--58, 2000.
[13]
F Baum, U Fischer, R Vosshenrich, and E Grabbe. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in ce mr imaging of the breast. European radiology, 12(5):1087--1092, 2002.
[14]
Ulf Hoffmann, Gunnar Brix, Michael V Knopp, Thomas Heβ, and Walter J Lorenz. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic mr mammography. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 33(4):506--514, 1995.
[15]
Hadassa Degani, Vadim Gusis, Daphna Weinstein, Scott Fields, and Shalom Strano. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by mri at high spatial resolution. Nature medicine, 3(7):780--782, 1997.
[16]
Susan G Orel. High-resolution mr imaging for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiographics, 18(4):903--912, 1998.
[17]
Paolo Belli, Melania Costantini, Enida Bufi, Andrea Magistrelli, Giuseppe La Torre, and Lorenzo Bonomo. Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation. La radiologia medica, 115(1):51--69, 2010.
[18]
Sibel Kul, Aysegul Cansu, Etem Alhan, Hasan Dinc, Gurbuz Gunes, and Abdulkadir Reis. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced mri in the characterization of breast tumors. American Journal of Roentgenology, 196(1):210--217, 2011.
[19]
Marco Moschetta, Michele Telegrafo, Leonarda Rella, Arcangela Capolongo, Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora, and Giuseppe Angelelli. Mr evaluation of breast lesions obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (dwibs) and correlations with histological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging, 32(6):605--609, 2014.
[20]
Edward S Fobben, Carole Z Rubin, Lester Kalisher, Alan G Dembner, Murray H Seltzer, and Elissa J Santoro. Breast mr imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology, 196(1):143--152, 1995.
[21]
Christiane Katharina Kuhl, Peter Mielcareck, Sven Klaschik, Claudia Leutner, Eva Wardelmann, Jürgen Gieseke, and Hans H Schild. Dynamic breast mr imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? 1. Radiology, 211(1):101--110, 1999.
[22]
Christiane K Kuhl, Hans H Schild, and Nuschin Morakkabati. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced mr imaging of the breast: Trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution 1. Radiology, 236(3):789--800, 2005.
[23]
Judith MS Prewitt. Object enhancement and extraction. Picture processing and Psychopictorics, 10(1):15--19, 1970.
[24]
David B Fogel. An information criterion for optimal neural network selection. IEEE transactions on neural networks/a publication of the IEEE Neural Networks Council, 2(5):490--497, 1990.
[25]
Filippo Menolascina, Domenico Bellomo, Thomas Maiwald, Vitoantonio Bevilacqua, Caterina Ciminelli, Angelo Paradiso, and Stefania Tommasi. Developing optimal input design strategies in cancer systems biology with applications to microfluidic device engineering. BMC Bioinformatics, 10(S-12):4, 2009.
[26]
Vitoantonio Bevilacqua, Giuseppe Mastronardi, and Giuseppe Piscopo. Evolutionary approach to inverse planning in coplanar radiotherapy. Image Vision Comput., 25(2):196--203, 2007.
[27]
Martin Riedmiller and Heinrich Braun. A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: The rprop algorithm. In Neural Networks, 1993., IEEE International Conference on, pages 586--591. IEEE, 1993.
[28]
Kevin S Woods, Christopher C Doss, Kevin W Bowyer, Jeffrey L Solka, Carey E Priebe, and W Philip Kegelmeyer JR. Comparative evaluation of pattern recognition techniques for detection of microcalcifications in mammography. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 7(06):1417--1436, 1993.
[29]
Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence O. Hall, and W. Philip Kegelmeyer. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research, pages 321--357, 2002.
[30]
Dennis Zill, Warren S Wright, and Michael R Cullen. Advanced engineering mathematics. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2011.
[31]
Andrew P Bradley. The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern recognition, 30(7):1145--1159, 1997.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Prediction and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning TechniquesData and Metadata10.56294/dm2024.3463Online publication date: 25-Sep-2024
  • (2024)A review of AutoML optimization techniques for medical image applicationsComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphics10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102441118(102441)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2023)DeepBreastCancerNet: A Novel Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Detection Using Ultrasound ImagesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1304208213:4(2082)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
July 2016
1510 pages
ISBN:9781450343237
DOI:10.1145/2908961
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. artificial neural networks
  2. breast lesions diagnosis
  3. decision support systems
  4. medical image classification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO '16
Sponsor:
GECCO '16: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
July 20 - 24, 2016
Colorado, Denver, USA

Acceptance Rates

GECCO '16 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 137 of 381 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Prediction and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning TechniquesData and Metadata10.56294/dm2024.3463Online publication date: 25-Sep-2024
  • (2024)A review of AutoML optimization techniques for medical image applicationsComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphics10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102441118(102441)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2023)DeepBreastCancerNet: A Novel Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Detection Using Ultrasound ImagesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1304208213:4(2082)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Deep Learning based Breast Image Classification Study for Cancer Detection2023 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Communication Systems (ICICACS)10.1109/ICICACS57338.2023.10100206(01-08)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Breast Cancer Detection System Using AI/ML2023 5th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N)10.1109/ICAC3N60023.2023.10541445(1099-1103)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Enhancing the Deep Learning-Based Breast Tumor Classification Using Multiple Imaging Modalities: A Conceptual ModelArtificial Intelligence and Speech Technology10.1007/978-3-030-95711-7_29(329-353)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2022
  • (2021)A Comprehensive Survey on Deep-Learning-Based Breast Cancer DiagnosisCancers10.3390/cancers1323611613:23(6116)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Intelligent Neonatal Sepsis Early Diagnosis System for Very Low Birth Weight InfantsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1101040411:1(404)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2021
  • (2020)A Deep Learning Approach for Hepatocellular Carcinoma GradingDeep Learning and Neural Networks10.4018/978-1-7998-0414-7.ch021(353-371)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)A Brief Survey on Breast Cancer Diagnostic With Deep Learning Schemes Using Multi-Image ModalitiesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30213438(165779-165809)Online publication date: 2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media