[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998184acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Demanding by Design: Supporting Effortful Communication Practices in Close Personal Relationships

Published: 25 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The investment of effort into personal communication can be highly meaningful to people, and has particular significance for the mediation of close relationships. This paper presents qualities of effort investment that are seen to be valuable. Furthermore, we consider how these qualities might sensitise designers of communication technologies to the meaningfulness of effort. We report a qualitative study focusing on individual descriptions of meaningful effort invested into everyday correspondence. We encapsulate our findings in the form of five qualities that characterise valued effort: discretionary investment, personal craft, focused time, responsiveness to the recipient, and challenge to a sender's capacities. Drawing on ideas generated in brainstorming sessions, we present two illustrative concepts for new communication technologies, highlighting how our findings can guide the creation of designed artefacts.

References

[1]
Natalya N. Bazarova. 2012a. Contents and contexts: Disclosure perceptions on Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 369--372.
[2]
Natalya N. Bazarova. 2012b. Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication 62, 5 (2012), 815--832.
[3]
Matt Billings and Leon A. Watts. 2010. Understanding dispute resolution online: Using text to reflect personal and substantive issues in conflict. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1447--1456.
[4]
Erin M. Bryant and Jennifer Marmo. 2012. The rules of Facebook friendship: A two-stage examination of interaction rules in close, casual, and acquaintance friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (2012), 1013--1035.
[5]
Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut. 2016. The Relationship between Facebook Use and Well-Being depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, 4 (2016), 265--281.
[6]
Moira Burke, Robert E. Kraut, and Cameron Marlow. 2011. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 571--580.
[7]
Daniel J. Canary, Laura Stafford, Kimberley S. Hause, and Lisa A. Wallace. 1993. An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports 10, 1 (1993), 3--14.
[8]
Andy Cockburn, Per Ola Kristensson, Jason Alexander, and Shumin Zhai. 2007. Hard lessons: Effort-inducing interfaces benefit spatial learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1571--1580.
[9]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Straus. 2008. Basics of qualitative research. Sage, London, UK.
[10]
Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Terry Hemmings, and Steve Benford. 2003. finding a place for UbiComp in the home. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 208--226.
[11]
Marianne Dainton and Brooks Aylor. 2002. Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs 69, 1 (2002), 52--66.
[12]
Marianne Dainton and Laura Stafford. 1993. Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10, 2 (1993), 255--271.
[13]
Hilary Davis, Mikael B. Skov, Malthe Stougaard, and Frank Vetere. 2007. Virtual Box: Supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (OZCHI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 151--159.
[14]
Kathryn Dindia and Daniel J. Canary. 1993. Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10, 2 (1993), 163--173.
[15]
Nicole B. Ellison, Rebecca Gray, Jessica Vitak, Cliff Lampe, and Andrew T. fiore. 2013. Calling all Facebook friends: Exploring requests for help on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 7th AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[16]
Nicole B. Ellison, Jessica Vitak, Rebecca Gray, and Cliff Lampe. 2014. Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 4 (2014), 855--870.
[17]
John C. Flanagan. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51, 4 (1954), 327.
[18]
David Frohlich and Rachel Murphy. 1999. Getting physical: What is fun computing in tangible form? Computers and Fun 2 (1999).
[19]
Daniel Gooch and Leon Watts. 2011. The magic sock drawer project. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 243--252.
[20]
Daniel Gooch and Leon Watts. 2014. Social Presence and the void in distant relationships: How do people use communication technologies to turn absence into fondness of the heart, rather than drifting out of mind? AI & Society 29, 4 (2014), 507--519.
[21]
Amie M. Gordon, Emily A. Impett, Aleksandr Kogan, Christopher Oveis, and Dacher Keltner. 2012. To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103, 2 (2012), 257.
[22]
Marc Hassenzahl, Stephanie Heidecker, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, and Uwe Hillmann. 2012. All you need is love: Current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 4, Article 30 (Dec. 2012), 19 pages.
[23]
Heekyoung Jung, Shaowen Bardzell, Eli Blevis, James Pierce, and Erik Stolterman. 2011. How deep is your love: Deep narratives of ensoulment and heirloom status. International Journal of Design 5, 1 (2011), 59--71.
[24]
Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2006. I just clicked to say I love you: Rich evaluations of minimal communication. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 363--368.
[25]
Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, and Leon Watts. 2015. Is 'additional' effort always negative?: Understanding discretionary work in interpersonal communications. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 191--194.
[26]
Simon King and Jodi Forlizzi. 2007. Slow messaging: Intimate communication for couples living at a distance. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 451--454.
[27]
Kaska E. Kubacka, Catrin finkenauer, Caryl E. Rusbult, and Loes Keijsers. 2011. Maintaining close relationships: Gratitude as a motivator and a detector of maintenance behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 10 (2011), 1362--1375.
[28]
Sian E. Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2009. Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: Attitudes of older adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1693--1702.
[29]
Andres Lucero. 2015. Using affinity diagrams to evaluate interactive prototypes. In Proceedings of the 15th IfiP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '15). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 231--248.
[30]
Daniel H. Mansson and Scott A. Myers. 2011. An initial examination of college students' expressions of affection through Facebook. Southern Communication Journal 76, 2 (2011), 155--168.
[31]
Panos Markopoulos. 2009. A design framework for awareness systems. In Awareness Systems, Panos Markopoulos, Boris De Ruyter, and Wendy Mackay (Eds.). Springer, 49--72.
[32]
Bree McEwan. 2013. Sharing, caring, and surveilling: An actor-partner interdependence model examination of Facebook relational maintenance strategies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 12 (2013), 863--869.
[33]
Carman Neustaedter, Kathryn Elliot, and Saul Greenberg. 2006. Interpersonal awareness in the domestic realm. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments (OZCHI '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 15--22.
[34]
Carman Neustaedter and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 753--762.
[35]
Norman H. Nie. 2001. Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American behavioral scientist 45, 3 (2001), 420--435.
[36]
William Odom, Mark Selby, Abigail Sellen, David Kirk, Richard Banks, and Tim Regan. 2012. Photobox: On the design of a slow technology. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 665--668.
[37]
Harry T. Reis, Margaret S. Clark, and John G. Holmes. 2004. Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Handbook of closeness and intimacy (2004), 201--225.
[38]
Yann Riche, Nathalie Henry Riche, Petra Isenberg, and Anastasia Bezerianos. 2010. Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time). In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10). 2705--2714.
[39]
Yann Riche and Wendy Mackay. 2010. PeerCare: Supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 19, 1 (2010), 73--104.
[40]
Natalia Romero, Panos Markopoulos, Joy Van Baren, Boris De Ruyter, Wijnand Ijsselsteijn, and Babak Farshchian. 2007. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 4 (2007), 299--312.
[41]
N. Sadat Shami, Michael Muller, Aditya Pal, Mikhil Masli, and Werner Geyer. 2015. Inferring employee engagement from social media. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3999--4008.
[42]
Victoria Schwanda Sosik and Natalya N. Bazarova. 2014. Relational maintenance on social network sites: How Facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior 35 (2014), 124--131.
[43]
Kimberly Tee, AJ Bernheim Brush, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2009. Exploring communication and sharing between extended families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 2 (2009), 128--138.
[44]
Anja Thieme, Jayne Wallace, James Thomas, Ko Le Chen, Nicole Kramer, and Patrick Olivier. 2011. Lovers' box: Designing for reflection within romantic relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 5 (2011), 283--297.
[45]
Stephanie T. Tong and Joseph B. Walther. 2011. Relational maintenance and CMC. Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (2011), 98--118.
[46]
Frank Vetere, Martin R. Gibbs, Jesper Kjeldskov, Steve Howard, Florian 'Floyd' Mueller, Sonja Pedell, Karen Mecoles, and Marcus Bunyan. 2005. Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 471--480.
[47]
Jessica Vitak. 2014. Facebook makes the heart grow fonder: Relationship maintenance strategies among geographically dispersed and communication-restricted connections. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 842--853.
[48]
Jessica Vitak and Nicole B. Ellison. 2012. 'There's a network out there you might as well tap': Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society 15, 2 (2012), 243--259.
[49]
Valerie Young, Melissa Curran, and Casey Totenhagen. 2013. A daily diary study: Working to change the relationship and relational uncertainty in understanding positive relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30, 1 (2013), 132--148.
[50]
Ferdinand R. H. Zijlstra. 1993. Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools. PhD Thesis, TU Delft. (1993).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Supporting Hard Conversations in Close Relationships Through DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869188:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)"Sharing, Not Showing Off": How BeReal Approaches Authentic Self-Presentation on Social Media Through Its DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869098:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Video Calls as a Replacement for Family Visits During Lockdowns in Aged Care: Interview Study With Family MembersJMIR Aging10.2196/409536(e40953)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Demanding by Design: Supporting Effortful Communication Practices in Close Personal Relationships

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 2017
    2556 pages
    ISBN:9781450343350
    DOI:10.1145/2998181
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 February 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. communication technologies
    2. effort
    3. relationships

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '17
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '17: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 25 - March 1, 2017
    Oregon, Portland, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 183 of 530 submissions, 35%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)74
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Supporting Hard Conversations in Close Relationships Through DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869188:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)"Sharing, Not Showing Off": How BeReal Approaches Authentic Self-Presentation on Social Media Through Its DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869098:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2023)Video Calls as a Replacement for Family Visits During Lockdowns in Aged Care: Interview Study With Family MembersJMIR Aging10.2196/409536(e40953)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Artificial intelligence and perceived effort in relationship maintenance: Effects on relationship satisfaction and uncertaintyJournal of Social and Personal Relationships10.1177/0265407523118989941:5(1232-1252)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2023
    • (2023)"I Want to Figure Things Out": Supporting Exploration in Navigation for People with Visual ImpairmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794967:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)“More than a cliché”: Experiencing Hybrid Gifting in the WildACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/357701530:4(1-31)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2023
    • (2023)“The less I type, the better”: How AI Language Models can Enhance or Impede Communication for AAC UsersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581560(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)IntimaSea: Exploring Shared Stress Display in Close RelationshipsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581000(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Older Adults Using Technology for Meaningful Activities During COVID-19: An Analysis Through the Lens of Self-Determination TheoryProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580839(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Exploring Digital Gifting RitualsArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2022.05.35.2.7335:2(73-85)Online publication date: 31-May-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media