[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2983323.2983850acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Annotating Points of Interest with Geo-tagged Tweets

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Microblogging services like Twitter contain abundant of user generated content covering a wide range of topics. Many of the tweets can be associated to real-world entities for providing additional information for the latter. In this paper, we aim to associate tweets that are semantically related to real-world locations or Points of Interest (POIs). Tweets contain dynamic and real-time information while POIs contain relatively static information. The tweets associated with POIs provide complementary information for many applications like opinion mining and POI recommendation; the associated POIs can also be used as POI tags in Twitter. We define the research problem of annotating POIs with tweets and propose a novel supervised Bayesian Model (sBM). The model takes into account the textual, spatial features and user behaviors together with the supervised information of whether a tweet is POI-related. It is able to capture user interests in latent regions for the prediction of whether a tweet is POI-related and the association between the tweet and its most semantically related POI. On tweets and POIs collected for two cities (New York City and Singapore), we demonstrate the effectiveness of our models against baseline methods.

References

[1]
A. Ahmed, L. Hong, and A. J. Smola. Hierarchical geographical modeling of user locations from social media posts. In WWW, pages 25--36, 2013.
[2]
E. Amitay, N. Har'El, R. Sivan, and A. Soffer. Web-a-where: Geotagging web content. In SIGIR, pages 273--280, 2004.
[3]
T. Bhattacharya, L. Kulik, and J. Bailey. Automatically recognizing places of interest from unreliable gps data using spatio-temporal density estimation and line intersections. Pervasive Mob. Comput., 19(C):86--107, 2015.
[4]
D. M. Blei and J. D. McAuliffe. Supervised topic models. In NIPS, pages 121--128, 2007.
[5]
S. Chandra, L. Khan, and F. Muhaya. Estimating twitter user location using social interactions--a content based approach. In SocialCom, pages 838--843, 2011.
[6]
L. Chen, G. Cong, X. Cao, and K. L. Tan. Temporal spatial-keyword top-k publish/subscribe. In ICDE, pages 255--266, 2015.
[7]
Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, and K. Lee. You are where you tweet: A content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In CIKM, pages 759--768, 2010.
[8]
E. Cho, S. A. Myers, and J. Leskovec. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In SIGKDD, pages 1082--1090, 2011.
[9]
N. Dalvi, R. Kumar, and B. Pang. Object matching in tweets with spatial models. In WSDM, pages 43--52, 2012.
[10]
R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. Liblinear: A library for large linear classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9:1871--1874, June 2008.
[11]
L. Hong, A. Ahmed, S. Gurumurthy, A. J. Smola, and K. Tsioutsiouliklis. Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream. In WWW, pages 769--778, 2012.
[12]
B. Hu and M. Ester. Spatial topic modeling in online social media for location recommendation. In RecSys, pages 25--32, 2013.
[13]
T. Joachims. Training linear svms in linear time. In SIGKDD, pages 217--226, 2006.
[14]
S. Kinsella, V. Murdock, and N. O'Hare. "i'm eating a sandwich in glasgow": Modeling locations with tweets. In SMUC, pages 61--68, 2011.
[15]
T. Kurashima, T. Iwata, T. Hoshide, N. Takaya, and K. Fujimura. Geo topic model: Joint modeling of user's activity area and interests for location recommendation. In WSDM, pages 375--384, 2013.
[16]
G. Li, J. Hu, J. Feng, and K. Tan. Effective location identification from microblogs. In ICDE, pages 880--891, 2014.
[17]
X. Li, G. Cong, X.-L. Li, T.-A. N. Pham, and S. Krishnaswamy. Rank-geofm: A ranking based geographical factorization method for point of interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 433--442, 2015.
[18]
X. Li, T.-A. N. Pham, G. Cong, Q. Yuan, X.-L. Li, and S. Krishnaswamy. Where you instagram?: Associating your instagram photos with points of interest. In CIKM, pages 1231--1240, 2015.
[19]
D. Lian and X. Xie. Learning location naming from user check-in histories. In GIS, pages 112--121, 2011.
[20]
B. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Yao, and H. Xiong. Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGKDD, pages 1043--1051, 2013.
[21]
H. Samet and R. E. Webber. Storing a collection of polygons using quadtrees. ACM Trans. Graph., 4(3):182--222, 1985.
[22]
B. Shaw, J. Shea, S. Sinha, and A. Hogue. Learning to rank for spatiotemporal search. In WSDM, pages 717--726, 2013.
[23]
B. P. Wing and J. Baldridge. Simple supervised document geolocation with geodesic grids. In HLT, pages 955--964, 2011.
[24]
M. Ye, P. Yin, W.-C. Lee, and D.-L. Lee. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 325--334, 2011.
[25]
H. Yin, B. Cui, L. Chen, Z. Hu, and Z. Huang. A temporal context-aware model for user behavior modeling in social media systems. In SIGMOD, pages 1543--1554, 2014.
[26]
H. Yin, B. Cui, L. Chen, Z. Hu, and C. Zhang. Modeling location-based user rating profiles for personalized recommendation. TKDD, Jan. 2014.
[27]
Q. Yuan, G. Cong, Z. Ma, A. Sun, and N. M. Thalmann. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 363--372, 2013.
[28]
Q. Yuan, G. Cong, Z. Ma, A. Sun, and N. M. Thalmann. Who, where, when and what: Discover spatio-temporal topics for twitter users. In SIGKDD, pages 605--613, 2013.
[29]
K. Zhao, G. Cong, Q. Yuan, and K. Q. Zhu. Sar: A sentiment-aspect-region model for user preference analysis in geo-tagged reviews. In ICDE, pages 675--686, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Deep learning for cross-domain data fusion in urban computingInformation Fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102606113:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
  • (2022)PGeoTopic: A Distributed Solution for Mining Geographical Topic ModelsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2020.298914234:2(881-893)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Towards the Inference of Travel Purpose with Heterogeneous Urban DataIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2019.29218238:1(166-177)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 2016
2566 pages
ISBN:9781450340731
DOI:10.1145/2983323
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. POI annotation
  2. bayesian model
  3. regression

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

CIKM'16
Sponsor:
CIKM'16: ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 24 - 28, 2016
Indiana, Indianapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 701 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Deep learning for cross-domain data fusion in urban computingInformation Fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102606113:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
  • (2022)PGeoTopic: A Distributed Solution for Mining Geographical Topic ModelsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2020.298914234:2(881-893)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Towards the Inference of Travel Purpose with Heterogeneous Urban DataIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2019.29218238:1(166-177)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Discovering Urban Functions of High-Definition Zoning with Continuous Human TracesProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3459637.3482253(1048-1057)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2021
  • (2021)LAST: Location-Appearance-Semantic-Temporal Clustering Based POI SummarizationIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2020.297747823(378-390)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2020)End-to-End Neural Matching for Semantic Location Prediction of TweetsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/341514939:1(1-35)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2020
  • (2019)Toward efficient navigation of massive-scale geo-textual streamsProceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3367471.3367716(4838-4845)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Geo-ALMProceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3367243.3367289(1807-1813)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Fine-Grained Geolocalization of User-Generated Short Text Based on a Weight Probability ModelIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29483557(153579-153591)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2019)Machine learning and points of interest: typical tourist Italian citiesCurrent Issues in Tourism10.1080/13683500.2019.163782723:13(1646-1658)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media