[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2983323.2983652acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Query Answering Efficiency in Expert Networks Under Decentralized Search

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Expert networks are formed by a group of expert-profes\-sionals with different specialties to collaboratively resolve specific queries. In such networks, when a query reaches an expert who does not have sufficient expertise, this query needs to be routed to other experts for further processing until it is completely solved; therefore, query answering efficiency is sensitive to the underlying query routing mechanism being used. Among all possible query routing mechanisms, decentralized search, operating purely on each expert's local information without any knowledge of network global structure, represents the most basic and scalable routing mechanism. However, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding of the efficiency of decentralized search in expert networks. In this regard, we investigate decentralized search by quantifying its performance under a variety of network settings. Our key findings reveal the existence of network conditions, under which decentralized search can achieve significantly short query routing paths (i.e., between O(log n) and O(log2 n) hops, n: total number of experts in the network). Based on such theoretical foundation, we then study how the unique properties of decentralized search in expert networks is related to the anecdotal small-world phenomenon. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work studying fundamental behaviors of decentralized search in expert networks. The developed performance bounds, confirmed by real datasets, can assist in predicting network performance and designing complex expert networks.

References

[1]
K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. De Rijke, "Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora," in ACM SIGIR, 2006.
[2]
P. Serdyukov, H. Rode, and D. Hiemstra, "Modeling multi-step relevance propagation for expert finding," in ACM CIKM, 2008.
[3]
Q. Shao, Y. Chen, S. Tao, X. Yan, and N. Anerousis, "Efficient ticket routing by resolution sequence mining," in ACM SIGKDD, 2008.
[4]
H. Zhang, E. Horvitz, Y. Chen, and D. C. Parkes, "Task routing for prediction tasks," in AAMAS, 2012.
[5]
G. Miao, L. E. Moser, X. Yan, S. Tao, Y. Chen, and N. Anerousis, "Generative models for ticket resolution in expert networks," in ACM SIGKDD, 2010.
[6]
A. Banerjee and S. Basu, "A social query model for decentralized search," in ACM SNAKDD, 2008.
[7]
J. Kleinberg and P. Raghavan, "Query incentive networks," in IEEE FOCS, 2005.
[8]
J. Zeng and W. Hsu, "Optimal routing in a small-world network," Journal of Computer Science & Technology, vol. 21, pp. 476--481, 2006.
[9]
H. Sun, M. Srivatsa, S. Tan, Y. Li, L. M. Kaplan, S. Tao, and X. Yan, "Analyzing expert behaviors in collaborative networks," in ACM SIGKDD, 2014.
[10]
B. Bollobás and F. D. L. Vega, "The diameter of random regular graphs," Combinatorica, vol. 2, pp. 125--134, 1982.
[11]
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks," Nature, vol. 393, pp. 440--442, 1998.
[12]
M. Draief and A. Ganesh, "Efficient routeing in poisson small-world networks," Journal of Applied Probability, pp. 678--686, 2006.
[13]
L. A. Adamic, R. M. Lukose, A. R. Puniyani, and B. A. Huberman, "Search in power-law networks," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 64, p. 046135, 2001.
[14]
S. Milgram, "The small world problem," Psychology Today, vol. 67, pp. 61--67, 1967.
[15]
J. Travers and S. Milgram, "An experimental study of the small world problem," Sociometry, vol. 32, pp. 425--443, 1969.
[16]
C. Korte and S. Milgram, "Acquaintance networks between racial groups: Application of the small world method," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 101--108, 1970.
[17]
J. Guare, Six Degrees of Separation: A Play. Vintage Books, 1990.
[18]
J. Kleinberg, "The small-world phenomenon: An algorithmic perspective," in ACM STOC, 2000.
[19]
L. Ma, "Query answering via decentralized search," Technical Report, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown, NY, USA, Jul 2016. {Online}. Available: http://researcher.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-maliang/QueryRoutingTR.pdf
[20]
J. Kleinberg, "Complex networks and decentralized search algorithms," in International Congress of Mathematicians, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)DeepRouting: A Deep Neural Network Approach for Ticket Routing in Expert Network2020 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)10.1109/SCC49832.2020.00057(386-393)Online publication date: Nov-2020
  • (2017)Mean Average Distance to Resolver: An Evaluation Metric for Ticket Routing in Expert Network2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)10.1109/ICSME.2017.18(594-602)Online publication date: Sep-2017

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 2016
2566 pages
ISBN:9781450340731
DOI:10.1145/2983323
© 2016 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. decentralized search
  2. expert networks
  3. performance bounds
  4. query answering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • ARL Network Science CTA

Conference

CIKM'16
Sponsor:
CIKM'16: ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 24 - 28, 2016
Indiana, Indianapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 701 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)DeepRouting: A Deep Neural Network Approach for Ticket Routing in Expert Network2020 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)10.1109/SCC49832.2020.00057(386-393)Online publication date: Nov-2020
  • (2017)Mean Average Distance to Resolver: An Evaluation Metric for Ticket Routing in Expert Network2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)10.1109/ICSME.2017.18(594-602)Online publication date: Sep-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media