[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2949035.2949051acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescgiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Multi-Affine Misalignment Removal from Bracketed Images for HDR Photography

Published: 28 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

A novel procedure able to align bracketed images acquired with a handheld camera is illustrated and discussed. The method is based on a system of linear equations solved via least squares, which provides the transformation parameters of Low Dynamic Range images acquired for High Dynamic Range photography. The method uses features automatically matched in multiple images and a mathematical formulation based on affine transformations simultaneously estimated for the whole dataset. This provides a new set of images with pixel-to-pixel correspondence along with statistics to evaluate the quality of image alignment.

References

[1]
Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., and Debevec, P. 2005. High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Graphics, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA
[2]
Cooper, T. 2015. HDR Photography: From Snapshots to Great Shots. Peachpit Pr, 230 p.
[3]
Bloch, C. 2013. The HDRI Handbook 2.0: high dynamic range imaging for photographers and CG artists. Rocky Nook, 672 p.
[4]
Concepcion, R. 2014. The HDR Book: Unlocking the Pros' Hottest Post-Processing Techniques (2nd Edition). Peachpit Press, 240 p.
[5]
Debevec, P.E., and Malik, J. 1997. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics, pp. 369.
[6]
Debevec, P.E., Malik, J. 2008. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Classes, pp. 31.
[7]
Fakruddin, B., Kareemunnisa A. B. H., and D. Suresha, 2014. A Survey on HDR Images and Image Fusioning Techniques. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 4(3), 377--382.
[8]
Hartley, R.I. and Zisserman A. 2004. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 672 pages.
[9]
Lowe, D.G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key-points. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60, 2, 91--110.
[10]
Fischler, M.A. and Bolles, R.C. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6), 381--395.
[11]
Arya, S., Mount, D.M., Netenyahu, N.S., Silverman, R. and Wu, A.Y., 1998. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions. Journal of the ACM, 45(6): 891--923.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CGI '16: Proceedings of the 33rd Computer Graphics International
June 2016
130 pages
ISBN:9781450341233
DOI:10.1145/2949035
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • FORTH: Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Adjustment
  2. Alignment
  3. HDR
  4. Image
  5. Registration

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CGI '16
CGI '16: Computer Graphics International
June 28 - July 1, 2016
Heraklion, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 159 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 64
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media