[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2835776.2835810acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Hierarchical Semi-supervised Classification with Incomplete Class Hierarchies

Published: 08 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In an entity classification task, topic or concept hierarchies are often incomplete. Previous work by Dalvi et al. [12] has showed that in non-hierarchical semi-supervised classification tasks, the presence of such unanticipated classes can cause semantic drift for seeded classes. The Exploratory learning [12] method was proposed to solve this problem; however it is limited to the flat classification task. This paper builds such exploratory learning methods for hierarchical classification tasks.
We experimented with subsets of the NELL [8] ontology and text, and HTML table datasets derived from the ClueWeb09 corpus. Our method (OptDAC-ExploreEM) outperforms the existing Exploratory EM method, and its naive extension (DAC-ExploreEM), in terms of seed class F1 on average by 10% and 7% respectively.

References

[1]
Freebase. http://freebase.com.
[2]
AIMMS. The MOSEK toolkit.
[3]
S. Basu, A. Banerjee, and R. Mooney. Semi-supervised clustering by seeding. In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2002. Citeseer, 2002.
[4]
D. M. Blei, T. L. Griffiths, and M. I. Jordan. The nested chinese restaurant process and bayesian nonparametric inference of topic hierarchies. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 57(2):7, 2010.
[5]
D. M. Blei, T. L. Griffiths, M. I. Jordan, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Hierarchical topic models and the nested chinese restaurant process. Advances in neural information processing systems, 16:17, 2004.
[6]
L. Cai and T. Hofmann. Hierarchical document categorization with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 78--87. ACM, 2004.
[7]
J. Callan. The clueweb09 dataset. http://boston.lti.cs.cmu.edu/Data/clueweb09/.
[8]
A. Carlson, J. Betteridge, R. C. Wang, E. R. Hruschka Jr, and T. M. Mitchell. Coupled semi-supervised learning for information extraction. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 101--110. ACM, 2010.
[9]
B. Dalvi and W. W. Cohen. Multi-view hierarchical semi-supervised learning by optimal assignment of sets of labels to instances. 2014.
[10]
B. Dalvi, W. W. Cohen, and J. Callan. Websets: Extracting sets of entities from the web using unsupervised information extraction. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '12, pages 243--252, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
[11]
B. Dalvi, W. W. Cohen, and J. Callan. Classifying entities into an incomplete ontology. In Proceedings of the 2013 workshop on Automated knowledge base construction, pages 31--36. ACM, 2013.
[12]
B. Dalvi, W. W. Cohen, and J. Callan. Exploratory learning. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 128--143. Springer, 2013.
[13]
B. Dalvi, E. Minkov, P. P. Talukdar, and W. W. Cohen. Automatic gloss finding for a knowledge base using ontological constraints. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '15, pages 369--378, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[14]
N. Friedman. The bayesian structural em algorithm. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pages 129--138. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998.
[15]
Z. Ghahramani, M. I. Jordan, and R. P. Adams. Tree-structured stick breaking for hierarchical data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 19--27, 2010.
[16]
S. Gopal, Y. Yang, B. Bai, and A. Niculescu-Mizil. Bayesian models for large-scale hierarchical classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2411--2419, 2012.
[17]
C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schtze. Introduction to information retrieval. In Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[18]
T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3111--3119, 2013.
[19]
T. P. Mohamed, E. R. Hruschka, Jr., and T. M. Mitchell. Discovering relations between noun categories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '11, pages 1447--1455, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2011. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[20]
A. Pal, N. Dalvi, and K. Bellare. Discovering hierarchical structure for sources and entities. In Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013.
[21]
J. Reisinger and M. Paşca. Latent variable models of concept-attribute attachment. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2-Volume 2, pages 620--628. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
[22]
R. Snow, D. Jurafsky, and A. Y. Ng. Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 801--808. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.
[23]
P. Willett. Recent trends in hierarchic document clustering: a critical review. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):577--597, 1988.
[24]
L. Xiao, D. Zhou, and M. Wu. Hierarchical classification via orthogonal transfer. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11), pages 801--808, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)CLP-GCN: Confidence and label propagation applied to Graph Convolutional NetworksApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109850132(109850)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2021)Variational Gridded Graph Convolution Network for Node ClassificationIEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica10.1109/JAS.2021.10042018:10(1697-1708)Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • (2019)Efficient Path Prediction for Semi-Supervised and Weakly Supervised Hierarchical Text ClassificationThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313658(3370-3376)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Hierarchical Semi-supervised Classification with Incomplete Class Hierarchies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '16: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 2016
    746 pages
    ISBN:9781450337168
    DOI:10.1145/2835776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. concept discovery
    2. hierarchical classification
    3. ontology extension
    4. semi-supervised learning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    WSDM 2016
    WSDM 2016: Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 22 - 25, 2016
    California, San Francisco, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    WSDM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 67 of 368 submissions, 18%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)CLP-GCN: Confidence and label propagation applied to Graph Convolutional NetworksApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109850132(109850)Online publication date: Jan-2023
    • (2021)Variational Gridded Graph Convolution Network for Node ClassificationIEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica10.1109/JAS.2021.10042018:10(1697-1708)Online publication date: Oct-2021
    • (2019)Efficient Path Prediction for Semi-Supervised and Weakly Supervised Hierarchical Text ClassificationThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313658(3370-3376)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
    • (2018)Dual Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph-Based Semi-Supervised ClassificationProceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3178876.3186116(499-508)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2018
    • (2018)A Neural Network-Powered Cognitive Method of Identifying Semantic Entities in Earth Science Papers2018 IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Computing (ICCC)10.1109/ICCC.2018.00009(9-16)Online publication date: Jul-2018
    • (2018)Active instance matching with pairwise constraints and its application to Chinese knowledge base constructionKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-017-1076-755:1(171-214)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
    • (2018)User-Centric Ontology PopulationThe Semantic Web10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_8(112-127)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2018
    • (2017)Integrated Framework for Improving Large-Scale Hierarchical Classification2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-146(281-288)Online publication date: Dec-2017
    • (2016)Teaching-to-Learn and Learning-to-Teach for Few Labeled Classification2016 International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD)10.1109/CBD.2016.054(271-276)Online publication date: Aug-2016

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media