[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2835776.2835805acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

To Suggest, or Not to Suggest for Queries with Diverse Intents: Optimizing Search Result Presentation

Published: 08 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a method of optimizing search result presentation for queries with diverse intents, by selectively presenting query suggestions for leading users to more relevant search results. The optimization is based on a probabilistic model of users who click on query suggestions in accordance with their intents, and modified versions of intent-aware evaluation metrics that take into account the co-occurrence between intents. Showing many query suggestions simply increases a chance to satisfy users with diverse intents in this model, while it in fact requires users to spend additional time for scanning and selecting suggestions, and may result in low satisfaction for some users. Therefore, we measured the loss of time caused by query suggestion presentation by conducting a user study in different settings, and included its negative effects in our optimization problem. Our experiments revealed that the optimization of search result presentation significantly improved that of a single ranked list, and was beneficial especially for patient users. Moreover, experimental results showed that our optimization was effective particularly when intents of a query often co-occur with a small subset of intents.

References

[1]
Statcounter global stats. Retrieved January 14, 2015, from http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop+mobile-comparison-ww-monthly-201312-201412.
[2]
M. Ageev, Q. Guo, D. Lagun, and E. Agichtein. Find it if you can: a game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. In SIGIR, pages 345--354, 2011.
[3]
R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying search results. In WSDM, pages 5--14, 2009.
[4]
A. Anagnostopoulos, L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, and A. Gionis. An optimization framework for query recommendation. In WSDM, pages 161--170, 2010.
[5]
F. Baskaya, H. Keskustalo, and K. Järvelin. Time drives interaction: simulating sessions in diverse searching environments. In SIGIR, pages 105--114, 2012.
[6]
C. Brandt, T. Joachims, Y. Yue, and J. Bank. Dynamic ranked retrieval. In WSDM, pages 247--256, 2011.
[7]
J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In SIGIR, pages 335--336, 1998.
[8]
B. Carterette and P. Chandar. Probabilistic models of ranking novel documents for faceted topic retrieval. In CIKM, pages 1287--1296, 2009.
[9]
O. Chapelle and Y. Chang. Yahoo! learning to rank challenge overview. In Yahoo! Learning to Rank Challenge, pages 1--24, 2011.
[10]
O. Chapelle, S. Ji, C. Liao, E. Velipasaoglu, L. Lai, and S.-L. Wu. Intent-based diversification of web search results: metrics and algorithms. Information Retrieval, 14(6):572--592, 2011.
[11]
O. Chapelle, D. Metlzer, Y. Zhang, and P. Grinspan. Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In CIKM, pages 621--630, 2009.
[12]
H. Chen and D. R. Karger. Less is more: probabilistic models for retrieving fewer relevant documents. In SIGIR, pages 429--436, 2006.
[13]
H. Cui, J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and W.-Y. Ma. Query expansion by mining user logs. IEEE TKDE, 15(4):829--839, 2003.
[14]
Z. Dou, S. Hu, K. Chen, R. Song, and J.-R. Wen. Multi-dimensional search result diversification. In WSDM, pages 475--484, 2011.
[15]
M. D. Dunlop. Time, relevance and interaction modelling for information retrieval. In SIGIR Forum, volume 31, pages 206--213, 1997.
[16]
J. He, V. Hollink, and A. de Vries. Combining implicit and explicit topic representations for result diversification. In SIGIR, pages 851--860, 2012.
[17]
K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4):422--446, 2002.
[18]
K. Järvelin, S. L. Price, L. M. L. Delcambre, and M. L. Nielsen. Discounted cumulated gain based evaluation of multiple-query ir sessions. In ECIR, pages 4--15, 2008.
[19]
T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR, pages 154--161, 2005.
[20]
M. P. Kato, T. Sakai, and K. Tanaka. Structured query suggestion for specialization and parallel movement: effect on search behaviors. In WWW, pages 389--398, 2012.
[21]
M. P. Kato, T. Yamamoto, H. Ohshima, and K. Tanaka. Investigating users' query formulations for cognitive search intents. In SIGIR, pages 577--586, 2014.
[22]
D. Lagun, C.-H. Hsieh, D. Webster, and V. Navalpakkam. Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search. In SIGIR, pages 113--122, 2014.
[23]
S. Liang, Z. Ren, and M. de Rijke. Fusion helps diversification. In SIGIR, pages 303--312, 2014.
[24]
T.-Y. Liu, J. Xu, T. Qin, W. Xiong, and H. Li. Letor: Benchmark dataset for research on learning to rank for information retrieval. In SIGIR 2007 workshop on learning to rank for information retrieval, pages 3--10, 2007.
[25]
F. Radlinski, R. Kleinberg, and T. Joachims. Learning diverse rankings with multi-armed bandits. In ICML, pages 784--791, 2008.
[26]
T. Sakai, Z. Dou, T. Yamamoto, Y. Liu, M. Zhang, R. Song, M. P. Kato, and M. Iwata. Overview of the NTCIR-10 INTENT-2 Task. In NTCIR-10, 2013.
[27]
R. L. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Exploiting query reformulations for web search result diversification. In WWW, pages 881--890, 2010.
[28]
M. D. Smucker and C. L. Clarke. Time-based calibration of effectiveness measures. In SIGIR, pages 95--104, 2012.
[29]
R. Song, M. Zhang, T. Sakai, M. P. Kato, Y. Liu, M. Sugimoto, Q. Wang, and N. Orii. Overview of the NTCIR-9 INTENT Task. In the 9th NTCIR Workshop Meeting on Evaluation of Information Access Technologies (NTCIR-9), pages 82--105, 2011.
[30]
H.-T. Yu and F. Ren. Search result diversification via filling up multiple knapsacks. In CIKM, pages 609--618, 2014.
[31]
C. X. Zhai, W. W. Cohen, and J. Lafferty. Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 10--17, 2003.
[32]
Y. Zhu, Y. Lan, J. Guo, X. Cheng, and S. Niu. Learning for search result diversification. In SIGIR, pages 293--302, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Social media intention mining for sustainable information systems: categories, taxonomy, datasets and challengesComplex & Intelligent Systems10.1007/s40747-021-00342-99:3(2773-2799)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
  • (2019)Asking Clarifying Questions in Open-Domain Information-Seeking ConversationsProceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3331184.3331265(475-484)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2019
  • (2017)A Theoretical Framework for Conversational SearchProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3020165.3020183(117-126)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. To Suggest, or Not to Suggest for Queries with Diverse Intents: Optimizing Search Result Presentation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '16: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 2016
    746 pages
    ISBN:9781450337168
    DOI:10.1145/2835776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. optimization
    2. query suggestion
    3. search result diversification

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    WSDM 2016
    WSDM 2016: Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 22 - 25, 2016
    California, San Francisco, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    WSDM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 67 of 368 submissions, 18%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Social media intention mining for sustainable information systems: categories, taxonomy, datasets and challengesComplex & Intelligent Systems10.1007/s40747-021-00342-99:3(2773-2799)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
    • (2019)Asking Clarifying Questions in Open-Domain Information-Seeking ConversationsProceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3331184.3331265(475-484)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2019
    • (2017)A Theoretical Framework for Conversational SearchProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3020165.3020183(117-126)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2017
    • (2016)Diversifying trending topic discovery via Semidefinite Programming2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData.2016.7840759(1512-1521)Online publication date: Dec-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media