[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2823513.2823516acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

We Click, We Align, We Learn: Impact of Influence and Convergence Processes on Student Learning and Rapport Building

Published: 13 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Behavioral convergence has been identified as one (largely subconscious) contributor to successful conversations, while rapport is one of the central constructs that explains development of personal relationships between these speakers over time. Social factors such as these have been shown to play a potent role in learning. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the relationship in dyadic peer tutoring conversations of convergence, building up of interpersonal rapport over time, and student learning, while positing a novel mechanism that links these constructs. We develop an approach for hierarchical computational modeling of convergence by accounting for time-based dependencies that arise in longitudinal interaction streams, and can thus a)quantify the effect of one partner's behavior on the other and differentiate between driver and recipient (Influence), b)extrapolate the outcome of directional influence to determine adaptation in partners' behaviors (Convergence). Our results illustrate that influence, convergence and rapport in the peer tutoring dialog are correlated with learning gains and provide concrete evidence for rapport being a causal mechanism that leads to convergence of speech rate in the interaction. We discuss the implications of our work for the development of peer tutoring agents that can improve learning gains through convergence to and from the human learner's behavior.

References

[1]
N. Ambady and R. Rosenthal. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 111(2):256, 1992.
[2]
A. B. Bernard and S. N. Durlauf. Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of econometrics, 71(1):161--173, 1996.
[3]
H. Bortfeld and S. E. Brennan. Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non-native speakers. Discourse Processes, 23(2):119--147, 1997.
[4]
H. Branigan, M. Pickering, and A. Cleland. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2):B13--B25, 2000.
[5]
W. Cade, N. Dowell, A. Graesser, Y. Tausczik, and J. Pennebaker. Modeling student socioaffective responses to group interactions in a collaborative online chat environment. In EDM, 2014.
[6]
J. N. Cappella. On defining conversational coordination and rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4):303--305, 1990.
[7]
J. Cassell, M. Ananny, A. Basu, T. Bickmore, P. Chong, D. Mellis, K. Ryokai, J. Smith, H. Vilhjálmsson, and H. Yan. Shared reality: physical collaboration with a virtual peer. In CHI'00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 259--260. ACM, 2000.
[8]
J. Cassell and T. Bickmore. Negotiated collusion: Modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(1--2):89--132, 2003.
[9]
J. Cassell, A. J. Gill, and P. A. Tepper. Coordination in conversation and rapport. In Proceedings of the workshop on Embodied Language Processing, pages 41--50. ACL, 2007.
[10]
H. H. Clark. Using language. Cambridge university press, 1996.
[11]
J. Coupland, N. Coupland, and H. Giles. Accommodation theory. communication, context and consequences. Contexts of Accommodation. Cambridge & Paris: Cambridge University Press & Éditions de la maison des sciences de l'homme, pages 1--68, 1991.
[12]
C. De Looze, S. Scherer, B. Vaughan, and N. Campbell. Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction. Speech Communication, 58:11--34, 2014.
[13]
P. Dillenbourg and P. Jermann. Designing integrative scripts. In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning, pages 275--301. Springer, 2007.
[14]
S. K. D'Mello, A. C. Strain, A. Olney, and A. Graesser. Affect, meta-affect, and affect regulation during complex learning. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, pages 669--681. Springer, 2013.
[15]
H. Friedberg, D. Litman, and S. B. Paletz. Lexical entrainment and success in student engineering groups. In Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2012 IEEE, pages 404--409. IEEE, 2012.
[16]
C. W. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 424--438, 1969.
[17]
E. Jones, C. Gallois, V. Callan, and M. Barker. Strategies of accommodation: Development of a coding system for conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(2):123--151, 1999.
[18]
B. Karacora, M. Dehghani, N. Kr\"amer-Mertens, and J. Gratch. The influence of virtual agents' gender and rapport on enhancing math performance. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 563--568, 2012.
[19]
K. Kreijns, P. A. Kirschner, and W. Jochems. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in human behavior, 19(3):335--353, 2003.
[20]
J. Kruger, U. Endriss, R. Fernández, and C. Qing. Axiomatic analysis of aggregation methods for collective annotation. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pages 1185--1192. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2014.
[21]
J. L. Lakin and T. L. Chartrand. Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological science, 14(4):334--339, 2003.
[22]
R. Levitan and J. B. Hirschberg. Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. 2011.
[23]
N. Lubold and H. Pon-Barry. Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and rapport in collaborative learning dialogues. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge, pages 5--12. ACM, 2014.
[24]
D. P. MacKinnon. Mediation analysis. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 2008.
[25]
A. Ogan, S. Finkelstein, E. Walker, R. Carlson, and J. Cassell. Rudeness and rapport: Insults and learning gains in peer tutoring. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 11--21. Springer, 2012.
[26]
R. Pea. The effect of mutual gaze perception on students' verbal coordination. In Educational Data Mining 2014, 2014.
[27]
M. J. Pickering and S. Garrod. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and brain sciences, 27(02):169--190, 2004.
[28]
D. Reitter, F. Keller, and J. D. Moore. Computational modelling of structural priming in dialogue. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, pages 121--124. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.
[29]
D. L. Schwartz. The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3):321--354, 1995.
[30]
N. Sebanz, H. Bekkering, and G. Knoblich. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(2):70--76, 2006.
[31]
A. M. Sharpley, J. W. Irvine, and C. F. Sharpley. An examination of the effectiveness of a cross-age tutoring program in mathematics for elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 20(1):103--111, 1983.
[32]
T. Sinha and J. Cassell. Fine-grained analyses of interpersonal processes and their effect on learning. In Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 781--785. Springer, 2015.
[33]
T. Sinha, R. Zhao, and J. Cassell. Exploring socio-cognitive effects of conversational strategy congruence in peer tutoring. In Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Modeling Interpersonal Synchrony, 17th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 2015.
[34]
S. D. Teasley, F. Fischer, A. Weinberger, K. Stegmann, P. Dillenbourg, M. Kapur, and M. Chi. Cognitive convergence in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences-Volume 3, pages 360--367. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2008.
[35]
A. Ward and D. Litman. Dialog convergence and learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 158:262, 2007.
[36]
R. Zhao, A. Papangelis, and J. Cassell. Towards a dyadic computational model of rapport management for human-virtual agent interaction. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, pages 514--527. Springer, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigating Linguistic Alignment in Collaborative Dialogue: A Study of Syntactic and Lexical Patterns in Middle School StudentsLanguage and Speech10.1177/00238309241234565Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Integrating Flow Theory and Adaptive Robot Roles: A Conceptual Model of Dynamic Robot Role Adaptation for the Enhanced Flow Experience in Long-term Multi-person Human-Robot InteractionsProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634945(116-126)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the relationship between math literacy and linguistic synchrony in online mathematical discussions through large‐scale data analyticsBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1344455:5(2226-2256)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. We Click, We Align, We Learn: Impact of Influence and Convergence Processes on Student Learning and Rapport Building

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    INTERPERSONAL '15: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Modeling INTERPERsonal SynchrONy And infLuence
    November 2015
    54 pages
    ISBN:9781450339865
    DOI:10.1145/2823513
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 November 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. convergence
    2. influence
    3. learning
    4. rapport

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • RK Mellon Foundation
    • Google

    Conference

    ICMI '15
    Sponsor:
    ICMI '15: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION
    November 13, 2015
    Washington, Seattle, USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Investigating Linguistic Alignment in Collaborative Dialogue: A Study of Syntactic and Lexical Patterns in Middle School StudentsLanguage and Speech10.1177/00238309241234565Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Integrating Flow Theory and Adaptive Robot Roles: A Conceptual Model of Dynamic Robot Role Adaptation for the Enhanced Flow Experience in Long-term Multi-person Human-Robot InteractionsProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634945(116-126)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Investigating the relationship between math literacy and linguistic synchrony in online mathematical discussions through large‐scale data analyticsBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1344455:5(2226-2256)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Improving collaborative problem-solving skills via automated feedback and scaffolding: a quasi-experimental study with CPSCoach 2.0User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-023-09387-634:4(1087-1125)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Examining Lexical Alignment in Human-Agent Conversations with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 ModelsChatbot Research and Design10.1007/978-3-031-54975-5_6(94-114)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Are We on the Same Page? Modeling Linguistic Synchrony and Math Literacy in Mathematical DiscussionsLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576082(599-605)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
    • (2023)A Ranking Model for Evaluation of Conversation Partners Based on Rapport LevelsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328798411(73024-73035)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2022)Socio-conversational systems: Three challenges at the crossroads of fieldsFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2022.9378259Online publication date: 15-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Long-Term Interaction with Relational SIAsThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563667(195-260)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
    • (2022)It Takes Two: Examining the Effects of Collaborative Teaching of a Robot LearnerArtificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_125(604-607)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media