[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2840728.2840733acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

On Hardness of Approximating the Parameterized Clique Problem

Published: 14 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In the Gap-clique (k, k/2) problem, the input is an n-vertex graph G, and the goal is to decide whether G contains a clique of size k or contains no clique of size k/2. It is an open question in the study of fixed parameterized tractability whether the Gap-clique (k, k/2) problem is fixed parameter tractable, i.e., whether it has an algorithm that runs in time f(k) ⋅ nα, where f(k) is an arbitrary function of the parameter k and the exponent α is a constant independent of k.
In this paper, we give some evidence that the Gap-clique(k, k/2) problem is not fixed parameter tractable. Specifically, we define a constraint satisfaction problem, which we call Deg-2-sat, where the input is a system of k' quadratic equations in k' variables over a finite field F of size n', and the goal is to decide whether there is a solution in F that satisfies all the equations simultaneously. The main result in this paper is an "FPT-reduction" from Deg-2-sat to the Gap-clique(k, k/2) problem. If one were to hypothesize that the Deg-2-sat problem is not fixed parameter tractable, then our reduction would imply that the Gap-clique(k, k/2) problem is not fixed parameter tractable either. The reduction relies on the algebraic techniques used in proof of the PCP theorem.

References

[1]
S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM, 45(3):501--555, 1998.
[2]
S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM, 45(1):70--122, 1998.
[3]
M. Blum, M. Luby, and R. Rubinfeld. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 47(3):549--595, 1993.
[4]
M. Ben-Or, D. Coppersmith, M. Luby, and R. Rubinfeld. Non-abelian homomorphism testing, and distributions close to their self-convolutions. Random Struct. Algorithms, 32(1):49--70, 2008.
[5]
Y. Chen, M. Grohe, and M. Graber. On parameterized approximability. In Parameterized and Exact Computation, volume 4169 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 109--120. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
[6]
3}miniR. G. Downey, V. Estivill-Castro, M. Fellows, E. Prieto, and F.A. Rosamund. Cutting up is hard to do: The parameterised complexity of k-cut and related problems. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 78:209--222, 2003.
[7]
R. G. Downey and M. R. Fellows. Fixed-parameter tractability and completeness I: basic results. SIAM J. Comput., 24(4):873--921, 1995.
[8]
R. G. Downey and M. R. Fellows. Fixed-parameter tractability and completeness II: on completeness for W{1}. Theor. Comput. Sci., 141(1&2):109--131, 1995.
[9]
R. G. Downey and M. R. Fellows. Parameterized Complexity. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[10]
J. Flum and M. Grohe. Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
[11]
Feige, S. Goldwasser, L. Lovász, S. Safra, and M. Szegedy. Approximating Clique is almost NP-complete. Journal of the ACM, 43:268--292, 1996.
[12]
D. Lazard. Systems of algebraic equations. Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, 72:88--94, 1979.
[13]
C. Lund, L. Fortnow, H. Karloff, and N. Nisan. Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems. J. ACM, 39(4):859--868, October 1992.
[14]
D. Marx. Parameterized complexity and approximation algorithms. The Computer Journal, 51:60--78, 2008.
[15]
A. Shamir. IP = PSPACE. J. ACM, 39(4):869--877, 1992.
[16]
J. von zur Gathen and J. Gerhard. Modern Computer Algebra. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2 edition, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Constant approximating k-clique is w[1]-hardProceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3406325.3451016(1749-1756)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021
  • (2018)New Tools and Connections for Exponential-Time ApproximationAlgorithmica10.1007/s00453-018-0512-8Online publication date: 5-Sep-2018
  • (2017)From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2017.74(743-754)Online publication date: Oct-2017

Index Terms

  1. On Hardness of Approximating the Parameterized Clique Problem

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITCS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
    January 2016
    422 pages
    ISBN:9781450340571
    DOI:10.1145/2840728
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 January 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. clique
    2. fixed parameter tractability
    3. hardness of approximation
    4. parameterized complexity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ITCS'16
    Sponsor:
    ITCS'16: Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
    January 14 - 17, 2016
    Massachusetts, Cambridge, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    ITCS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 145 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 513 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Constant approximating k-clique is w[1]-hardProceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3406325.3451016(1749-1756)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021
    • (2018)New Tools and Connections for Exponential-Time ApproximationAlgorithmica10.1007/s00453-018-0512-8Online publication date: 5-Sep-2018
    • (2017)From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2017.74(743-754)Online publication date: Oct-2017

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media