[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702559acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Activists Are Both Born and Made: An Analysis of Users on Change.org

Published: 18 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

E-petitioning has become one of the most important and popular forms of online activism. Although e-petition success is driven by user behavior, users have received relatively little study by HCI and social computing researchers. Drawing from theoretical and empirical work in analogous social computing systems, we identify two potentially competing theories about the trajectories of users in e-petition platforms: (1) "power" users in social computing systems are born, not made; and (2) users mature into "power" users. In a quantitative analysis of data from Change.org, one of the largest online e-petition platforms, we test and find support for both theories. A follow-up qualitative analysis shows that not only do users learn from their experience, systems also "learn" from users to make better recommendations. In this sense, we find that although power users are "born," they are also "made" through both processes of personal growth and improved support from the system.

References

[1]
Ahn, J., Butler, B. S., Weng, C., & Webster, S. Learn-ing to be a better q'er in social Q&A sites: Social norms and information artifacts. In Proc. the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2013).
[2]
An, J., Quercia, D., & Crowcroft, J. Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. In Proc. WWW (2014).
[3]
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2002).
[4]
Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. Suggest Bot: using intelligent task routing to help peo-ple find work in Wikipedia. In Proc. IUI (2007).
[5]
Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value. In Proc. CHI (2006).
[6]
Cruickshank, P., Edelmann, N., & Smith, C. F. Signing an e-petition as a transition from lurking to participation (2010).
[7]
Hale, S. A., Margetts, H., & Yasseri, T. Petition growth and success rates on the United Kingdom No. 10 Downing Street Website. In Proc. WebSci (2013).
[8]
Jungherr, A. and Jürgens, P. The Political click: Political participation through e-petitions in Germany. Poli-cy & Internet (2010).
[9]
Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B. A., Suh, B., & Mytkowicz, T. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. World Wide Web (2007).
[10]
Kraut, R. E., & Resnick, P. Building Successful Online Communities Evidence-Based Social Design (2012).
[11]
1Lave, Jean. & Wenger, E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. (1991).
[12]
Margetts, H. Z., John, P., Hale, S. A., & Reissfelder, S. Leadership without Leaders' Starters and Followers in Online Collective Action. Political Studies (2013).
[13]
Muller, M. Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In Proc. CSCW (2012).
[14]
Panagiotopoulos, P., & Elliman, T. Online engagement from the grassroots: Reflecting on over a decade of e-petitioning experience in Europe and the United Kingdom. In Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance (2012).
[15]
Pal, A., Farzan, R., Konstan, J. A., & Kraut, R. E. Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities. In User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2011).
[16]
Panciera, K., Aaron, H., and Loren T. Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia." In Proc. GROUP (2009).
[17]
Panciera, K., Priedhorsky, R., Erickson, T., & Terveen, L. Lurking? cyclopaths?: a quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki. In Proc. CHI (2010).
[18]
Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. In AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (2009).
[19]
Wash, R., & Jacob S. Coordinating donors on crowd-funding websites." In Proc. CSCW (2014)

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)When is grassroots lobbying effective? The case of the e-petitions at the national level in the UKInterest Groups & Advocacy10.1057/s41309-024-00208-813:2(213-243)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
  • (2023)Increasing Participation in Peer Production Communities with the Newcomer HomepageProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100717:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Comfort Activism: Online Photography for Social Change in a Minority GroupProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794687:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. How Activists Are Both Born and Made: An Analysis of Users on Change.org

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2015
    4290 pages
    ISBN:9781450331456
    DOI:10.1145/2702123
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 April 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. civic engagement
    2. contribution
    3. e-petition
    4. motivation
    5. online activism
    6. power user

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '15
    Sponsor:
    CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 18 - 23, 2015
    Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 486 of 2,120 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)54
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)When is grassroots lobbying effective? The case of the e-petitions at the national level in the UKInterest Groups & Advocacy10.1057/s41309-024-00208-813:2(213-243)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
    • (2023)Increasing Participation in Peer Production Communities with the Newcomer HomepageProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100717:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Comfort Activism: Online Photography for Social Change in a Minority GroupProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794687:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)COVID Non-Conformity via the Korean National Petition: Citizens’ Responses to Pandemic Biopolitical Social ControlCritical Criminology10.1007/s10612-023-09706-831:2(327-342)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023
    • (2022)Exploring Change.Org as a Digital Heterotopia: A Foucauldian Approachİlef Dergisi10.24955/ilef.958572Online publication date: 31-May-2022
    • (2022)Many Destinations, Many Pathways: A Quantitative Analysis of Legitimate Peripheral Participation in ScratchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551066:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)“A Reasonable Thing to Ask For”: Towards a Unified Voice in Privacy Collective ActionProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517467(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Origines et impacts des hyper-utilisateurs et hyper-utilisatrices en cyberdémocratie. Le cas du pétitionnement en ligneParticipations10.3917/parti.028.0125N° 28:3(125-149)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Introduction. La participation politique en ligne au révélateur du pétitionnement électroniqueParticipations10.3917/parti.028.0007N° 28:3(7-45)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Intereses que movilizan a la comunidad digital de change.org: más allá de lo políticoGlobal Media Journal México10.29105/gmjmx18.34-618:34Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media