[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702481acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction

Published: 18 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Most Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) researchers are accustomed to the process of formal ethics review for their evaluation or field trial protocol. Although this process varies by country, the underlying principles are universal. While this process is often a formality, for field research or lab-based studies with vulnerable users, formal ethics requirements can be challenging to navigate -- a common occurrence in the social sciences; yet, in many cases, foreign to HCI researchers. Nevertheless, with the increase in new areas of research such as mobile technologies for marginalized populations or assistive technologies, this is a current reality. In this paper we present our experiences and challenges in conducting several studies that evaluate interactive systems in difficult settings, from the perspective of the ethics process. Based on these, we draft recommendations for mitigating the effect of such challenges to the ethical conduct of research. We then issue a call for interaction researchers, together with policy makers, to refine existing ethics guidelines and protocols in order to more accurately capture the particularities of such field-based evaluations, qualitative studies, challenging lab-based evaluations, and ethnographic observations.

References

[1]
ABC Canada. Who Wants to Learn? ABC Canada Literacy Foundation Report. 2001
[2]
Bos, N. et al. Research ethics in the Facebook era: privacy, anonymity, and oversight. ACM CHI 2009.
[3]
Buchanan, E.A. and Ess, C. Internet Research Ethics and the Institutional Review Board: Current Practices and Issues. SIGCAS Computers and Society (39:3), 2008
[4]
Chalmers, M. Ethics, logs and videotape: ethics in large scale user trials and user generated content. CHI 2011.
[5]
Detweiler, C. et al. Values in Design Building Bridges between RE, HCI and Ethics. INTERACT 2011
[6]
Ess, C. and Jones, S. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. In Buchanan, E.A. (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research. 2004.
[7]
Ess, C. Internet Research Ethics. In Joinson, A. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. 2007
[8]
Ethics Rupture: An Invitational Summit about Alternatives to Research-Ethics Review. St. Thomas University & University of New Brunswick, 2012.
[9]
Friedman, B. et al. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems, 2006.
[10]
https://itunes.apple.com/app/brailletouch/id579725651 accessed on 2015/01/07.
[11]
Fournier H. et al. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Enhancing Infantry Training through Immersive Technologies. I/ITSEC 2011.
[12]
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1968.
[13]
Guta, A. et al. Resisting the seduction of "ethics creep": Using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review. Journal Social Science & Medicine, 2012.
[14]
van den Hoonaard, W. Is Research-Ethics Review a Moral Panic? Canadian Review of Sociology (38), 2001.
[15]
Kahn, J.P. and Mastroianni A.C. Moving From Compliance to Conscience: Why We Can and Should Improve on the Ethics of Clinical Research. In Arch Intern Med. 161(7) 2001.
[16]
Killshaw, S. Ethics in studying contested illness. In McClancy, J. (Ed). Ethics in the Field. 2013
[17]
Kim, S.N. Whose voice is it anyway? Rethinking the oral history method in accounting research on race, ethnicity and gender. In Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(8), 2008
[18]
Li, J. Ethical Challenges in Participant Observation: A Reflection on Ethnographic Fieldwork. The Qualitative Report (13:1), 2008.
[19]
Lingel, J. Ethics and dilemmas of online ethnography. CHI 2012.
[20]
Marsden, G. and Jones, M. Inspiring Mobile Interaction Design. ACM CHI 2011 Course.
[21]
Mackay, W. Ethics, lies and videotape. ACM CHI 1995.
[22]
Moncur, W., Masthoff, J., Reiter, E., Freer, Y., and Nguyen, H. Providing Adaptive Health Updates across the Personal Social Network. Human-Computer Interaction 29, 3 (2014), 256--309
[23]
Moncur, W., Mahamood, S., Reiter, E., and Freer, Y. Involving healthcare consumers in knowledge acquisition for virtual healthcare. AAAI Fall Symposium Series, AAAI Press (2009), 43--51.
[24]
Moncur, W. The Emotional Wellbeing of Researchers: Considerations for Practice. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2013.
[25]
Munteanu, C., Molyneaux, H., Maitland, J., McDonald, D., Leung, R., Fournier, H., and Lumsden, J. Hidden in plain sight: Low literacy adults in a developed country overcoming social and educational challenges through mobile learning support tools. In the Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer-Verlag, November 2013
[26]
Munteanu, C., Molyneaux, H., Maitland, J., McDonald, D., Leung, R., Lumsden, J., and Fournier, H. A Tale of Two Studies: Challenges in Field Research with Low-literacy Adult Learners in a Developed Country. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2012.
[27]
Munteanu C., Fournier, H., Lapointe, J.F., Emond, B., and Kondratova, I. We'll Take it from Here: Letting the Users Take Charge of the Evaluation and Why that Turned Out Well. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2013.
[28]
National Research Ethics Service. NRES guidance on information sheets and consent forms. 2007.
[29]
Romero, M., Frey, B., Southern, C., and Abowd, G.D. BrailleTouch: designing a mobile eyes-free soft keyboard. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) 2011.
[30]
Southern, C., Clawson, J., Frey, B., Abowd, G.D., and Romero, M. An evaluation of BrailleTouch: mobile touchscreen text entry for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) 2012.
[31]
Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans, 2nd edition, 2010.
[32]
Williams, A. et al. Anchored mobilities: mobile technology and transnational migration. ACM DIS 2008

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Hybrid researching race-related issues during COVID-19: Methodological conundrumsPossibility Studies & Society10.1177/27538699241273732Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant PerspectivesJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics10.1177/15562646241290078Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The space between us: Developing an ethics of care in duoethnographyQualitative Research10.1177/14687941241255243Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ethics
      2. field studies
      3. research protocol
      4. situational ethics
      5. vulnerable populations

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '15
      Sponsor:
      CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 18 - 23, 2015
      Seoul, Republic of Korea

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 486 of 2,120 submissions, 23%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI 2025
      ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)266
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Hybrid researching race-related issues during COVID-19: Methodological conundrumsPossibility Studies & Society10.1177/27538699241273732Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant PerspectivesJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics10.1177/15562646241290078Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
      • (2024)The space between us: Developing an ethics of care in duoethnographyQualitative Research10.1177/14687941241255243Online publication date: 21-May-2024
      • (2024)Voicing Discomfort, Communicating Breakdowns: Design Exploration of Felt Ethics in a Body-Based WorkshopProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685375(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
      • (2024)The Ethics of Mixed Reality GamesGames: Research and Practice10.1145/36758062:3(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Languaging Ethics in Technology PracticeACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36564681:2(1-15)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI ResearchProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660714(3515-3533)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Changing Lanes Toward Open Science: Openness and Transparency in Automotive User ResearchProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675730(94-105)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Exploring the Future of Informed Consent: Applying a Service Design ApproachProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373308:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Charting Ethical Tensions in Multispecies Technology Research through Beneficiary-Epistemology SpaceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641994(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media