[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2788940.2788950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of Docking Task Performance Using Mid-air Interaction Techniques

Published: 08 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Mid-air interaction has the potential to manipulate objects in 3D with more natural input mappings. We compared the performance attainable using various mid-air interaction methods with a mechanically constrained input device in a 6 degrees-of-freedom (DoF) docking task in both accuracy and completion time. We found that tangible mid-air input devices supported faster docking performance, while exhibiting accuracy close to that of constrained devices. Interaction with bare hands in mid-air achieved similar time performance and accuracy compared to the constrained device.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (sui0164-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Balakrishnan, R., Baudel, T., Kurtenbach, G., and Fitzmaurice, G. The rockin-mouse: integral 3d manipulation on a plane. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (1997), 311--318.
[2]
Berard, F., Ip, J., Benovoy, M., El-Shimy, D., Blum, J. R., and Cooperstock, J. R. Did Minority Report get it wrong? Superiority of the mouse over 3D input devices in a 3D placement task. Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2009. Springer, 2009, 400--414.
[3]
Boritz, J., and Booth, K. S. A study of interactive 6 dof docking in a computerised virtual environment. In Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1998. Proceedings., IEEE 1998, IEEE (1998), 139--146.
[4]
Bruder, G., Steinicke, F., and Sturzlinger, W. To touch or not to touch?: comparing 2d touch and 3d mid-air interaction on stereoscopic tabletop surfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st symposium on Spatial user interaction, ACM (2013), 9--16.
[5]
Cutler, L. D., Froehlich, B., and Hanrahan, P. Two-handed direct manipulation on the responsive workbench. In Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, ACM (1997), 107--114.
[6]
de la Riviere, J.-B., Kervégant, C., Orvain, E., and Dittlo, N. Cubtile: a multi-touch cubic interface. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, ACM (2008), 69--72.
[7]
Froehlich, B., Hochstrate, J., Skuk, V., and Huckauf, A. The globefish and the globemouse: two new six degree of freedom input devices for graphics applications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM (2006), 191--199.
[8]
Glesser, D., Bérard, F., and Cooperstock, J. R. Overcoming limitations of the trackpad for 3d docking operations. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2013), 1239--1244.
[9]
Grossman, T., Wigdor, D., and Balakrishnan, R. Multi-finger gestural interaction with 3d volumetric displays. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM (2004), 61--70.
[10]
Hancock, M., Ten Cate, T., and Carpendale, S. Sticky tools: full 6dof force-based interaction for multi-touch tables. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ACM (2009), 133--140.
[11]
Hincapié-Ramos, J. D., Guo, X., Moghadasian, P., and Irani, P. Consumed endurance: A metric to quantify arm fatigue of mid-air interactions. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2014), 1063--1072.
[12]
Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J. C., and Kassell, N. F. Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (1994), 452--458.
[13]
Hubona, G. S., Shirah, G. W., and Jennings, D. K. The effects of cast shadows and stereopsis on performing computer-generated spatial tasks. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on 34, 4 (2004), 483--493.
[14]
Kratz, S., Rohs, M., Guse, D., Muller, J., Bailly, G., and Nischt, M. Palmspace: continuous around-device gestures vs. multitouch for 3d rotation tasks on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM (2012), 181--188.
[15]
Levesque, J.-C., Laurendeau, D., and Mokhtari, M. An asymmetric bimanual gestural interface for immersive virtual environments. In Virtual Augmented and Mixed Reality. Designing and Developing Augmented and Virtual Environments. Springer, 2013, 192--201.
[16]
Mapes, D. P., and Moshell, J. M. A two-handed interface for object manipulation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 4, 4 (1995), 403--416.
[17]
Markussen, A., Jakobsen, M. R., and Hornbaek, K. Vulture: a mid-air word-gesture keyboard. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2014), 1073--1082.
[18]
Martinet, A., Casiez, G., and Grisoni, L. The effect of dof separation in 3d manipulation tasks with multi-touch displays. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, ACM (2010), 111--118.
[19]
Mendes, D., Fonseca, F., Araujo, B., Ferreira, A., and Jorge, J. Mid-air interactions above stereoscopic interactive tables. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2014 IEEE Symposium on, IEEE (2014), 3--10.
[20]
Moehring, M., and Froehlich, B. Effective manipulation of virtual objects within arm's reach. In Virtual Reality Conference (VR), 2011 IEEE, IEEE (2011), 131--138.
[21]
Muller, J., Geier, M., Dicke, C., and Spors, S. The boomroom: mid-air direct interaction with virtual sound sources. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2014), 247--256.
[22]
Pavlovych, A., and Stuerzlinger, W. The tradeoff between spatial jitter and latency in pointing tasks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems, ACM (2009), 187--196.
[23]
Poupyrev, I., Billinghurst, M., Weghorst, S., and Ichikawa, T. The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in vr. In Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM (1996), 79--80.
[24]
Reisman, J. L., Davidson, P. L., and Han, J. Y. A screen-space formulation for 2d and 3d direct manipulation. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM (2009), 69--78.
[25]
Schild, J., Jr, J. J. L., and Masuch, M. Altering gameplay behavior using stereoscopic 3d vision-based video game design. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2014), 207--216.
[26]
Shoemake, K. Arcball: a user interface for specifying three-dimensional orientation using a mouse. In Graphics Interface, vol. 92 (1992), 151--156.
[27]
Song, P., Goh, W. B., Hutama, W., Fu, C.-W., and Liu, X. A handle bar metaphor for virtual object manipulation with mid-air interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 1297--1306.
[28]
Teather, R. J., Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W., and MacKenzie, I. S. Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement. In 3D User Interfaces, 2009. 3DUI 2009. IEEE Symposium on, IEEE (2009), 43--50.
[29]
Teather, R. J., and Stuerzlinger, W. Pointing at 3d targets in a stereo head-tracked virtual environment. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2011 IEEE Symposium on, IEEE (2011), 87--94.
[30]
Wang, G., McGuffin, M. J., Brard, F., and Cooperstock, J. R. Pop-up depth views for improving 3d target acquisition. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2011, Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society (2011), 41--48.
[31]
Wang, R., Paris, S., and Popović, J. 6d hands: markerless hand-tracking for computer aided design. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM (2011), 549--558.
[32]
Wobbrock, J. O. Practical statistics for human-computer interaction. In Annual Workshop of the HCI Consortium, HCIC (2011).
[33]
Zhai, S., and Milgram, P. Quantifying coordination in multiple dof movement and its application to evaluating 6 dof input devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1998), 320--327.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Virtual Task Environments Factors Explored in 3D Selection StudiesProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670983(1-16)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Precise Tool to Target Positioning Widgets (TOTTA) in Spatial Environments: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345620630:11(7020-7030)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Comparison of a Kinematic and a Dynamic Docking Task Interaction Technique in an Interactive Physics AR Simulation2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00170(592-595)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of Docking Task Performance Using Mid-air Interaction Techniques

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SUI '15: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
    August 2015
    152 pages
    ISBN:9781450337038
    DOI:10.1145/2788940
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 August 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 3d docking task
    2. 3d interaction
    3. unconstrained mid-air

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SUI '15
    SUI '15: Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
    August 8 - 9, 2015
    California, Los Angeles, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    SUI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 48 submissions, 35%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 86 of 279 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Virtual Task Environments Factors Explored in 3D Selection StudiesProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670983(1-16)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Precise Tool to Target Positioning Widgets (TOTTA) in Spatial Environments: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345620630:11(7020-7030)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Comparison of a Kinematic and a Dynamic Docking Task Interaction Technique in an Interactive Physics AR Simulation2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00170(592-595)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Interactive Augmented Reality Pop-Up Book with Natural Gesture Interaction for HandheldEncyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games10.1007/978-3-031-23161-2_365(984-993)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Constraint-based bare-hand immersive 3D modellingi-com10.1515/icom-2023-001322:2(125-141)Online publication date: 31-May-2023
    • (2023)Abacus GesturesProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36108987:3(1-30)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Virtual Trackball on VR Controller: Evaluation of 3D Rotation Methods in Virtual RealityExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585682(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Investigating the Effects of Individual Spatial Abilities on Virtual Reality Object ManipulationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581004(1-24)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Widget Design for Precise and Intuitive Guidance in Surgical Spatial Environments2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00173(785-788)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Pointing It Out! Comparing Manual Segmentation of 3D Point Clouds between Desktop, Tablet, and Virtual RealityInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.223894540:19(5602-5616)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media