Article

Free access

Expected usability and product preference

Author:

DIS '97: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques

Pages 197 - 204

https://doi.org/10.1145/263552.263607

Published: 01 August 1997 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Batra, R. & Ahtola, O. T. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2 (1990), 159-170

Crossref

Google Scholar

[2]

Bevan, N. & Macleod, M. Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information technology, vol. 13, 1 and 2 (1994), 132-145

Google Scholar

[3]

Brucks, M. The effects of product class knowledge on information search behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June 1985), 1-16

Crossref

Google Scholar

[4]

CapIan, S. H. Making Usability a Kodak Product Differentiator. In Wiklund, M. E. (Ed.) Usability in Practice. How Companies Develop User-Friendly Products. AP Professional, 1994

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Carroll, J. and Olson, J.R. Mental models in human-computer interaction. In Helander, M. (cd.) Handbooks of human-computer interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988), 45-65

Google Scholar

[6]

Chin, J. P.; Diehl, V.A, & Norman, K.L. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of ACM CHI'88 Washington, DC May 15-19,213-218

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user performance ad behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38 (1993), 475-487

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavioc An introduction to theory ad research. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1975

Google Scholar

[9]

Gardner, M. Effects of mood states on consumer information processing. Research in Consumer behavior, 2, 1987, 113-135

Google Scholar

[10]

Gutman, J.A. Means-ends chain model based on consumer categorisation process. Journal of Marketing 46 (1982), 60-72

Crossref

Google Scholar

[11]

Grunet, K.G. Attributes, attribute value and their characteristics: a unifying approach and an example involving a complex household investment. Journal of economic psychology, 10 (1989), 229-251

Google Scholar

[12]

Harper, P.D, & Norman, K.L. Improving user satisfaction: The questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction version 5.5., the 1st Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, Virginia Beach, VA (1993), 224-228

Google Scholar

[13]

Harrison, M. C.; Henneman, R.L. and Blatt, L.A. Design of a human factors cost-justification tool. In Bias, R.G. and Mayhew, D.J. (eds.) Cost-justifying usability. Academic Press Inc. Boston (1994),203-241

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

Hart, S.G. & Staveland, L, E., Development of NASA-TLX: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock & Meshkati (al.) Human mental workload. Elsevier, Amsterdam ( 1988), 139-183

Google Scholar

[15]

Helgeson, J. G. & Ursic, M.L. Information load, cost/benefit assessment and decision strategy variability. Journal of academy of marketing 21 no 1 (1993), 13-20

Google Scholar

[16]

Holbrook, M.B. Emotion in the consumption experience: toward a new model of the human consumer In Peterson, R. A.; Hoyer, W. D.& Wilson W.R. (eds.). 'I%e role of affect in consumer behavior, Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts (1986), 17-52

Google Scholar

[17]

Igbaria, M.; Schiffman, S. J.; Wieckowski, T. J. The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information technology. VOI 13 no 6 (1994), 349-361

Google Scholar

[18]

1S0 DIS 9241-11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTS):- Part 11: Guidance on usability. Draft international standard. September 1994

Google Scholar

[19]

Keinonen, T.; Nieminen, M. Riihiaho, S. & Sade, S. . Designing usable smart products. TKO-C81, Otaniemi, Helsinki University of Technology, 1996

Google Scholar

[20]

King, M.F. & Bakmubramanian, S.K. The effects of expertise, end goal, and product type on adoption of preference formation strategy, Journal of Academy of Marketing, 22 no 2 (1994), 146-159

Crossref

Google Scholar

[21]

Kuutti, K. & Bannon, L. J. Some confusions at the interface: re-conceptualizing the "interface" problem. In Nurminen, M. I.; Jarvinen, P.; Weir, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the conference on Human Jobs and Computer Interfaces June 26-28, 1991. Tampereen Yliopisto, Tampere, 94-112

Google Scholar

[22]

Lefkoff-Hagius, R. & Mason, C.H. Characteristics, beneficial, and image attributes in consumer judgments of similarity and preference. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (June 1993), 100-110

Crossref

Google Scholar

[23]

Mathis, B. Where next? Innovation, (summer 1994) 1994,32-33

Google Scholar

[24]

Nielsen, J. Usability engineering. Academic Press Inc., Boston, 1993

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

Norman, D.A. Cognitive engineering. In Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W. (eds.) User centered system design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ ( 1986), 31-61

Google Scholar

[26]

Nunnally, J.C. (1987). Psychometric theory (2ed.), McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

Google Scholar

[27]

Oliver, R.L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute basis of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (Dec. 1993), 418-430

Crossref

Google Scholar

[28]

Poison, P. G. & Lewis, C. H. llwory-Based design for Easily Learned Interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction 5 (1990), 191-220

Crossref

Google Scholar

[29]

Porteous, M; Kirakowsky, J. & Corbett, M. SUMI user handbook. University College Cork, Ireland, 1993

Google Scholar

[30]

Shackel, B. Usability - Context, Framework, Design and Evaluation. In Shackel, B. & Richardson, S. (eds.) Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991 ), 21-38

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[31]

Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1986

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[32]

Solomon, M.R. Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (2nd cd). Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1994

Google Scholar

[33]

Urbany, J.E; Dickson, J.R. & Wilkie, W.L. Buyer uncertainty and information search. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (Sept. 1989) 208-215

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Nuševa DMarić RVukmirović GMacura N(2024)Key determinants of consumers' decision making on the purchase of wristwatches on the Serbian marketAnali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici10.5937/AnEkSub2300021N(31-48)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnEkSub2300021N
Kim TJang JJeon GKim J(2024)Investigating Driver Preferences for Traffic Information Using Digital Signage and Road Surface HologramsKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering10.1007/s12205-024-1253-728:4(1475-1488)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1253-7
Ilhan ATogay A(2023)Use of eye-tracking technology for appreciation-based information in design decisions related to product details: Furniture exampleMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-15947-083:3(8013-8042)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15947-0
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Expected usability and product preference
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
2. Information systems
  1. Data management systems
  2. Information systems applications

Recommendations

Influences of personal preference on product usability
CHI EA '06: CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This study intended to demonstrate experimentally that user trust or affection for a brand affects the results of usability tests. For the experimental method, experimentees were exposed to products made by companies they preferred and did not preferred,...
Smart factory product lines: a configuration perspective on smart production ecosystems
SPLC '15: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line

Smart production aims to increase the flexibility of the production processes and be more efficient in the use of resources. Two important pillars of this initiative are "smart products" and "smart factories". From the perspective of product line ...
Evaluating Usability of IFML Models: How Usability is Perceived and Propagated
IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems

System acceptance is strongly related to its usability. It is important that the usability is carefully designed during the system design steps and later propagated to the interface. This care avoids reworking the interface design of an application in ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

DIS '97: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques

August 1997

436 pages

ISBN:0897918630

DOI:10.1145/263552

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

DIS97

Sponsor:

IFIP WG 13.2
SIGCHI

DIS97: Designing Interactive Systems '97

August 18 - 20, 1997

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

26
Total Citations
View Citations
1,933
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)106
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Nuševa DMarić RVukmirović GMacura N(2024)Key determinants of consumers' decision making on the purchase of wristwatches on the Serbian marketAnali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici10.5937/AnEkSub2300021N(31-48)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnEkSub2300021N
Kim TJang JJeon GKim J(2024)Investigating Driver Preferences for Traffic Information Using Digital Signage and Road Surface HologramsKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering10.1007/s12205-024-1253-728:4(1475-1488)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1253-7
Ilhan ATogay A(2023)Use of eye-tracking technology for appreciation-based information in design decisions related to product details: Furniture exampleMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-15947-083:3(8013-8042)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15947-0
Nizamani SNizamani SKhoumbati KNizamani SMemon SBasir N(2018)Cultural Preferences of Pakistan for the University Website Design2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M)10.1109/ICT4M.2018.00066(323-328)Online publication date: Jul-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4M.2018.00066
Ye HWatson JSargent AAyaz HSuri R(2018)Machine Usability Effects on Preferences for Hot DrinksAdvances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering10.1007/978-3-319-94866-9_38(376-382)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94866-9_38
Seo KLee SChung B(2016)Effects of Perceived Usability and Aesthetics on Emotional Responses in Different Contexts of UseInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2016.116053732:6(445-459)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2016
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1160537
Kim KHan SYun MKwahk J(2015)A Systematic Procedure for Modeling Usability Based on Product Design Variables: A Case Study in Audiovisual Consumer Electronic ProductsInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics10.1080/10803548.2002.110765388:3(387-406)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2015
https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2002.11076538
Koohang APaliszkiewicz J(2015)E-Learning Courseware Usability: Building a Theoretical ModelJournal of Computer Information Systems10.1080/08874417.2015.1164580156:1(55-61)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2015
https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2015.11645801
Seo KLee SChung BPark C(2014)Users’ Emotional Valence, Arousal, and Engagement Based on Perceived Usability and Aesthetics for Web SitesInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2014.95910331:1(72-87)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2014
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.959103
Bartuskova AKrejcar O(2013)Evaluation Framework for User Preference Research Implemented as Web ApplicationProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications - Volume 808310.1007/978-3-642-40495-5_54(537-548)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-40495-5_54
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Influences of personal preference on product usability

Smart factory product lines: a configuration perspective on smart production ecosystems

Evaluating Usability of IFML Models: How Usability is Perceived and Propagated