[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2630088.2630089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Coupled congestion control for RTP media

Published: 18 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Congestion occurs at a bottleneck along an Internet path; multiple flows between the same sender and receiver pairs can benefit from using only a single congestion control instance when they share the same bottleneck. These benefits include the ability to control the rate allocation between flows and reduced overall delay (multiple congestion control instances cause more queuing delay than one since each has no knowledge of the congestion episodes experienced by the others). We present a mechanism for coupling congestion control for real-time media and show its benefits by coupling multiple congestion controlled flows that share the same bottleneck.

References

[1]
SPDY: An experimental protocol for a faster web. http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper. Last Accessed:06/07/2013.
[2]
L. Andrew, S. Floyd, and G. Wang. Common TCP evaluation suite. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-tmrg-tests-02.txt, 2009.
[3]
H. Balakrishnan, H. Rahul, and S. Seshan. An integrated congestion manager architecture for internet hosts. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 1999.
[4]
L. Eggert, J. Heidemann, and J. Touch. Effects of ensemble TCP. USC/Information Sciences Institute, 7(1), December 1999.
[5]
S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer. Equation-based congestion control for unicast applications. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2000.
[6]
C. Holmberg, S. Hakansson, and G. Eriksson. Web real-time communication use-cases and requirements. Internet-draft draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12.txt (work in progress), 2013.
[7]
S. Islam, M. Welzl, S. Gjessing, and N. Khademi. Coupled congestion control for RTP media. Technical Report 440, March 2014. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/39177.
[8]
M. Nagy, V. Singh, J. Ott, and L. Eggert. Congestion control using fec for conversational multimedia communication. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.1582, 2013.
[9]
P. Natarajan, P. D. Amer, and R. Stewart. Multistreamed web transport for developing regions. In SIGCOMM NSDR workshop, 2008.
[10]
R. Rejaie, M. Handley, and D. Estrin. RAP: An end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the internet. In IEEE INFOCOM, 1999.
[11]
M. Savorific, H. Karl, M. Schläger, T. Poschwatta, and A. Wolisz. Analysis and performance evaluation of the EFCM common congestion controller for TCP connections. Computer Networks, 49(2):269--294, 2005.
[12]
J. Touch. TCP control block interdependence. RFC 2140, April 1997.
[13]
M. C. Weigle, P. Adurthi, F. Hernández-Campos, K. Jeffay, and F. D. Smith. Tmix: A tool for generating realistic TCP application workloads in ns-2. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 36(3):65--76, July 2006.
[14]
M. Welzl, S. Islam, and S. Gjessing. Coupled congestion control for RTP media. Internet-draft draft-welzl-rmcat-coupled-cc-02 (work in progress), 2013.
[15]
M. Welzl, F. Niederbacher, and S. Gjessing. Beneficial transparent deployment of SCTP: the missing pieces. In IEEE GLOBECOM, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Real-Life Implementation and Evaluation of Coupled Congestion Control for WebRTC Media and Data FlowsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.320604110(95046-95066)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Follow the Model: How Recursive Networking Can Solve the Internet’s Congestion Control Problems2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)10.1109/ICNC47757.2020.9049648(518-524)Online publication date: Feb-2020
  • (2019)How to Control a TCP: Minimally-Invasive Congestion Management for Datacenters2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)10.1109/ICCNC.2019.8685516(121-125)Online publication date: Feb-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSWS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop
August 2014
70 pages
ISBN:9781450329910
DOI:10.1145/2630088
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 August 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. congestion control
  2. fse
  3. rmcat
  4. webrtc

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGCOMM'14
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM'14: ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference
August 18, 2014
Illinois, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSWS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 10 of 23 submissions, 43%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 19 of 40 submissions, 48%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Real-Life Implementation and Evaluation of Coupled Congestion Control for WebRTC Media and Data FlowsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.320604110(95046-95066)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Follow the Model: How Recursive Networking Can Solve the Internet’s Congestion Control Problems2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)10.1109/ICNC47757.2020.9049648(518-524)Online publication date: Feb-2020
  • (2019)How to Control a TCP: Minimally-Invasive Congestion Management for Datacenters2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)10.1109/ICCNC.2019.8685516(121-125)Online publication date: Feb-2019
  • (2018)Lightweight and flexible single-path congestion control couplingNOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406137(1-6)Online publication date: Apr-2018
  • (2018)ctrlTCP: Reducing latency through coupled, heterogeneous multi-flow TCP congestion controlIEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)10.1109/INFCOMW.2018.8406887(214-219)Online publication date: Apr-2018
  • (2016)Start Me UpProceedings of the 2016 Applied Networking Research Workshop10.1145/2959424.2959440(52-54)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2016
  • (2016)Managing real-time media flows through a flow state exchangeNOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502803(112-120)Online publication date: Apr-2016
  • (2016)OpenTCP: Combining congestion controls of parallel TCP connections2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC)10.1109/IMCEC.2016.7867199(194-198)Online publication date: Oct-2016
  • (2016)Congestion control in the recursive InterNetworking Architecture (RINA)2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)10.1109/ICC.2016.7510818(1-7)Online publication date: May-2016
  • (2015)Last NProceedings of the 25th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video10.1145/2736084.2736094(19-24)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media