[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2612733.2612739acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding the determinants of success in inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: results from a national survey

Published: 18 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing have the potential of generating great benefits to government agencies and other social actors dealing with complex public problems. However, these initiatives have proved to be difficult to implement and important challenges have been identified in previous studies. Existing literature deals with challenges and enablers as important success factors for inter-organizational information sharing initiatives. Most of this research is based on cases and there are few quantitative empirical studies about this topic. Based on a national survey of government managers in two policy domains, this study starts filling this gap by systematically identifying some important determinants of the success of inter-organizational information sharing initiatives through quantitative empirical analysis. Our analysis suggests four factors as the key determinants of inter-organizational information sharing success. We found that the following variables are statistically significant and clearly influence the success of inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: (1) availability of financial resources, (2) formally appointed project managers, (3) technical compatibility and (4) standards. As mentioned before, this is one of the first quantitative explorations and testing of success factors of inter-organizational information sharing in government settings and additional research is clearly needed.

References

[1]
Agranoff, R. Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers. Public Administration Review 66, (2006), 56--65.
[2]
Andersen, D. F. and Dawes, S. S. Government Information Management: A Primer and Casebook. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
[3]
Bekkers, V. Flexible information infrastructures in Dutch E-Government collaboration arrangements: Experiences and policy implications. Government Information Quarterly 26, 1 (2009), 60--68.
[4]
Caffrey, L., ed. Information Sharing Between and Within Governments. Commonwealth Secretariat, 2000.
[5]
Cresswell, A. B., Canestraro, D. S., Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T. A., and Schneider, C. Inter-organizational information integration: lessons from the field. (2004).
[6]
Cresswell, A. M., Pardo, T. A., Thompson, F., et al. Modeling intergovernmental collaboration: a system dynamics approach. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002. HICSS, (2002), 10 pp.--.
[7]
Dawes, S. S., Cresswell, A. M., and Pardo, T. A. From "Need to Know? to "Need to Share?: Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks. Public Administration Review 69, 3 (2009), 392--402.
[8]
Dawes, S. S., Gharawi, M., and Burke, B. Knowledge and Information Sharing in Transnational Knowledge Networks: A Contextual Perspective. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (2011), 1--10.
[9]
Dawes, S. S. and Pardo, T. A. Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems. In W. J. M. Jr and A. K. Elmagarmid, eds., Advances in Digital Government. Springer US, 2002, 259--273.
[10]
Dawes, S. S. and Prefontaine, L. Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM 46, 1 (2003), 40--42.
[11]
Dawes, S. S. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15, 3 (1996), 377--394.
[12]
Demercivi, F., Thompson, F., and Bodor, T. Overcoming Cultural Barriers to Criminal Justice Information Integration After the 9--11 crisis. (2004).
[13]
Eglene, O., Dawes, S. S., and Schneider, C. A. Authority and Leadership Patterns in Public Sector Knowledge Networks. (2003), 91--113.
[14]
Eglene, O., Dawes, S. S., and Schneider, C. A. Authority and Leadership Patterns in Public Sector Knowledge Networks. The American Review of Public Administration 37, 1 (2007), 91--113.
[15]
Fedorowicz, J., Gogan, J. L., and Williams, C. B. A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case. Government Information Quarterly 24, 4 (2007), 785--807.
[16]
Ferro, E. and Sorrentino, M. Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of E-Government in peripheral areas? Evidence from Italy. Government Information Quarterly 27, 1 (2010), 17--25.
[17]
Fountain, J. E. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
[18]
Gharawi, M. A. and Dawes, S. S. Conceptualizing Knowledge and Information Sharing in Transnational Governmental Networks. (2010).
[19]
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Burke, G. B. (2010). Conceptualizing information integration in government. In H. J. Schnoll (Ed.), E-government: Information, technology, and transformation: M. E. Sharpe.
[20]
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Chun, S. A., and Janssen, M. Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical. Information Polity 14, 1 (2009), 1--10.
[21]
Gil-García, J. R. and Pardo, T. A. E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22, 2 (2005), 187--216.
[22]
Gil-garcia, J. R. Enacting state websites: A mixed method study exploring e-government success in multi-organizational settings. University at Albany, State University of New, (2005).
[23]
Ginzberg, M. J. Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions. Management Science 27, 4 (1981), 459--478.
[24]
Gottschalk, P. Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly 26, 1 (2009), 75--81.
[25]
Guijarro, L. Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government Information Quarterly 24, 1 (2007), 89--101.
[26]
Hale, K. and McNeal, R. Technology, politics, and e-commerce: Internet sales tax and interstate cooperation. Government Information Quarterly 28, 2 (2011), 262--270.
[27]
Huxham, C. and Vangen, S. Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World. Academy of Management Journal 43, 6 (2000), 1159--1175.
[28]
Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Ives, B. Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 15, 2 (1991), 205.
[29]
Kaarst-Brown, M. L. Five symbolic roles of the external consultant -- Integrating change, power and symbolism. Journal of Organizational Change Management 12, 6 (1999), 540--561.
[30]
Kwon, H., Pardo, T. A., and Burke, G. B. Interorganizational collaboration and community building for the preservation of state government digital information: Lessons from NDIIPP state partnership initiative. Government Information Quarterly 26, 1 (2009), 186--192.
[31]
Landsbergen, D. and Wolken, G. Eliminating Legal and Policy Barriers to Interoperable Government Systems. Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 1--30.
[32]
Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R., and Cruz, C. B. Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives. Government Information Quarterly 24, 4 (2007), 808--826.
[33]
Luna-Reyes, L. F. and Gil-Garcia, J. R. Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly 28, 3 (2011), 329--345.
[34]
McDermott, P. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly 27, 4 (2010), 401--413.
[35]
McGuire, M. Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It. Public Administration Review 66, (2006), 33--43.
[36]
Motwani, J., Mirchandani, D., Madan, M., and Gunasekaran, A. Successful implementation of ERP projects: Evidence from two case studies. International Journal of Production Economics 75, 1--2 (2002), 83--96.
[37]
Murray, K. R. and Hsieh, I. K. Archiving Web-published materials: A needs assessment of librarians, researchers, and content providers. Government Information Quarterly 25, 1 (2008), 66--89.
[38]
O'Toole, L. J., Jr. Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 57, 1 (1997), 45--52.
[39]
Pardo, T. A., Burke, B., Gil-Garcia, J. R., and Guler, A. Clarity of Roles and Responsibilities in Government Cross-Boundary Information Sharing Initiatives: Identifying the Determinants. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on e-Government, (2009).
[40]
Pardo, T. A., Cresswell, A., and Burke, G. B. Modeling the social & technical processes of interorganizational information integration. (2004).
[41]
Pardo, T. A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., and Burke, G. B. Information sharing and public health: A case-based look at the ICT expectations-reality gap. In A. Meijer, K. Boersma and P. Wagenaar, eds., ICTs, Citizens and Governance: After the Hype! IOS Press, 2009.
[42]
Pardo, T. A. and Tayi, G. K. Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government. Government Information Quarterly 24, 4 (2007), 691--715.
[43]
Ramon Gil-Garcia, J., Chengalur-Smith, I., and Duchessi, P. Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 2 (2007), 121--133.
[44]
Reddick, C. G. and Frank, H. A. The perceived impacts of e-government on U.S. cities: A survey of Florida and Texas City managers. Government Information Quarterly 24, 3 (2007), 576--594.
[45]
Scholl, H. J. and Klischewski, R. E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda. International Journal of Public Administration 30, 8--9 (2007), 889--920.
[46]
Schooley, B. L. and Horan, T. A. Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS). Government Information Quarterly 24, 4 (2007), 755--784.
[47]
Tapscott, D. and Caston, A. Paradigm Shift: The New Promise of Information Technology. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1993.
[48]
Wang, H., Song, Y., Hamilton, A., and Curwell, S. Urban information integration for advanced e-Planning in Europe. Government Information Quarterly 24, 4 (2007), 736--754.
[49]
Yang, T. M. and Maxwell, T. A. Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, (2011).
[50]
Yang, T. M. and Wu, Y.-J. What to Share and Why to Share? A Case Study of Cross-Boundary Information Sharing in Taiwan e-Government. Journal of Library & Information Studies 11, 1 (2013), 25--53.
[51]
Zheng, L., Yang, T.-M., Pardo, T., and Jiang, Y. Understanding the "Boundary" in Information Sharing and Integration. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09, (2009), 1--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unravelling Interorganisational Data Sharing Conundrum – The Good Data, The Bad Data, and The Ugly DataSustainability and Empowerment in the Context of Digital Libraries10.1007/978-981-96-0868-3_23(267-276)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
  • (2021)Attempts to share information between public sector organisations over timeInformation Polity10.3233/IP-20023426:3(289-310)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Inter-agency information sharing for Chinese e-government development: a comparison between vertical and horizontal dimensionsInformation Technology for Development10.1080/02681102.2020.180156628:2(297-318)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2014
365 pages
ISBN:9781450329019
DOI:10.1145/2612733
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Digital Government Society of North America

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. electronic government
  2. information sharing
  3. inter-organizational information sharing success
  4. success factors

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

dg.o '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

dg.o '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 62 submissions, 58%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unravelling Interorganisational Data Sharing Conundrum – The Good Data, The Bad Data, and The Ugly DataSustainability and Empowerment in the Context of Digital Libraries10.1007/978-981-96-0868-3_23(267-276)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
  • (2021)Attempts to share information between public sector organisations over timeInformation Polity10.3233/IP-20023426:3(289-310)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Inter-agency information sharing for Chinese e-government development: a comparison between vertical and horizontal dimensionsInformation Technology for Development10.1080/02681102.2020.180156628:2(297-318)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2020
  • (2019)Cultivating Optimal Collaborative Decision Making in Counterterrorism Contexts: An Empirical InvestigationInternational Journal of Public Administration10.1080/01900692.2019.167677744:3(202-214)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2019
  • (2017)Assessment of Factors Influencing Information Sharing Arrangements Using the Best-Worst MethodDigital Nations – Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_10(94-106)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2017
  • (2016)Exploring XBRL-Based Reporting System: A Conceptual Framework for System Adoption and ImplementationSocial Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_28(305-316)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2016
  • (2015)Analyzing the Influence of Governance Structure Determinants on the Success of Inter-organizational Information Sharing InitiativesProceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences10.1109/HICSS.2015.267(2232-2241)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media