[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675296acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Don't Wait!: How Timing Affects Coordination of Crowdfunding Donations

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Crowdfunding sites often impose deadlines for projects to receive their requested funds. This deadline structure creates a difficult decision for potential donors. Donors can donate early to a project to help it reach its goal and to signal to other donors that the project is worthwhile. But donors may also want to wait for a similar signal from others. We conduct an experimental simulation of a crowdfunding website to explore how potential donors to projects make this decision. We find evidence for both strategies in our experiment; some donate early while others wait till the last second. However, we also find that making an early donation is usually a better strategy for donors because the amount of donations made early in a project's campaign is often the only difference between that project being funded or not. This finding suggests that crowdfunding sites need to develop designs, policies and incentives that encourage people to make immediate donations so that the site can most efficiently fund projects.

References

[1]
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., and Goldfarb, A. The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper #16820, February 2011.
[2]
Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., and Goldfarb, A. Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013.
[3]
Andreoni, J. Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics 37, 3 (1988), 291--304.
[4]
Andreoni, J. Philanthropy. In Handbook of Giving, Reciprocity, and Altruism. Elsivier / North Holland, 2005.
[5]
Andreoni, J. Leadership giving in charitable fundraising. Journal of Public Economics 8, 1 (2006), 1--22.
[6]
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Tech. Rep. 1578175, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), April 2012.
[7]
Gerber, E. M., and Hui, J. Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 6 (2013), 34.
[8]
Greenberg, M., and Gerber, E. Crowdfunding: A survey and taxonomy. Tech. Rep. 12-03, Northwestern University Segal Design Institute, 2012.
[9]
Greenberg, M. D., and Gerber, E. M. Learning to fail: experiencing public failure online through crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2014), 581--590.
[10]
Hui, J. S., Greenberg, M. D., and Gerber, E. M. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 62--74.
[11]
Jian, L., and Usher, N. Crowd-funded journalism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 19, 2 (January 2014).
[12]
Kickstarter. Statistics. http://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats, June 2014.
[13]
Kuppuswamy, V., and Bayus, B. L. Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of projects backers in kickstarter. SSRN Electronic Journal (2013).
[14]
Mitra, T., and Gilbert, E. The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 49--61.
[15]
Mollick, E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 29, 1 (2014), 1--16.
[16]
Pak, C., and Wash, R. Importance of recent experience and initial overconfidence:factors of crowdfundiners' limited learning. Working Paper, June 2014.
[17]
Shin, J., and Jian, L. Driving forces behind readers' donation to crowd-funded journalism: The case of spot.us. Working paper, University of Southern California, 2012.
[18]
Smith, V. L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review 66, 2 (May 1976), 274--279.
[19]
Wash, R. The value of completing crowdfunding projects. In International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), AAAI Press (July 2013).
[20]
Wash, R., and Solomon, J. Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 38--48.
[21]
Xu, A., Yang, X., Rao, H., Fu, W.-T., Huang, S.-W., and Bailey, B. P. Show me the money!: An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 591--600.
[22]
Zhang, J., and Liu, P. Rational herding in microloan markets. Management science 58, 5 (2012), 892--912.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Information disclosure and funding success of green crowdfunding campaigns: a study on GoFundMeFinancial Innovation10.1186/s40854-024-00666-810:1Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Message (in)congruence: Tweeting while competing for donationsCommunication and the Public10.1177/205704732312248229:1(69-83)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Strategic Pricing and Information Disclosure in CrowdfundingIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.337474832:4(2988-3001)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Don't Wait!: How Timing Affects Coordination of Crowdfunding Donations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2015
    1956 pages
    ISBN:9781450329224
    DOI:10.1145/2675133
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tag

    1. crowdfunding

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation

    Conference

    CSCW '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Information disclosure and funding success of green crowdfunding campaigns: a study on GoFundMeFinancial Innovation10.1186/s40854-024-00666-810:1Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Message (in)congruence: Tweeting while competing for donationsCommunication and the Public10.1177/205704732312248229:1(69-83)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Strategic Pricing and Information Disclosure in CrowdfundingIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.337474832:4(2988-3001)Online publication date: Aug-2024
    • (2024)Consequences of donors’ trust toward project-related information: Impact on charitable crowdfunding propagation in social networksJournal of Data, Information and Management10.1007/s42488-024-00113-46:1(51-64)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
    • (2023)The Success of Cancer Crowdfunding Campaigns: Project and Text AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4419725(e44197)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2023
    • (2023)The influencing factor model and empirical research of TikTok charity live streaming impact users’ online charitable donationPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.029418618:11(e0294186)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Backers Beware: Characteristics and Detection of Fraudulent Crowdfunding CampaignsSensors10.3390/s2219767722:19(7677)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Understanding social influence in Facebook fundraising: Relationship strength, immediacy of needs, and number of donationsJournal of Philanthropy and Marketing10.1002/nvsm.1749Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Explaining Donation Behavior in Medical Crowdfunding in Social MediaSage Open10.1177/2158244021101452011:2Online publication date: 30-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Experts in the crowd and their influence on herding in reward-based crowdfunding of cultural projectsSmall Business Economics10.1007/s11187-020-00424-xOnline publication date: 25-Feb-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media