[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2668260.2668268acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmedesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Stochastic Hyper-Heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem in combinatorial auctions

Published: 15 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a stochastic hyper-heuristic (SHH) for combining heuristics for solving the winner determination problem (WDP) in combinatorial auctions. The hyper-heuristics vary for the choice of the underlying heuristics. The choice function hyper-heuristic uses a selection function while the random hyper-heuristic selects randomly the underlying heuristics. In this paper, we propose a new idea for hyper-heuristics by combining choice function and randomness strategies. The two strategies in the proposed approach are controlled by using a walk probability as done in stochastic local search. The proposed method is evaluated on various benchmark problems. The numerical results show that the SHH performs better in almost all cases and the comparison is done with the choice function hyper-heuristic, the random hyper-heuristic and the well-known Stochastic Local Search (SLS).

References

[1]
Anderson, A., Tenhunen, M. and Ygge, F. (2000), 'Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination', Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, IEEE Computer Society Press, July, pp: 39--46.
[2]
Bean. J.C, (1994). 'Genetics and random keys for sequencing and optimization', ORSA Journal of Computing, vol 6, nÂř2, pp: 154--160.
[3]
Boughaci. D, Benhamou. B and Drias. H. (2009), 'A Memetic Algorithm for the Optimal Winner Determination Problem, In Soft Computing, vol 13, numbers 8-9, pp: 905-- 917.
[4]
Boughaci. D. (2010), 'A Differential Evolution Algorithm for the Winner Determination Problem in Combinatorial Auctions'. in Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, vol 36, pp: 535--542.
[5]
Boughaci. D, Belaid Benhamou, Habiba Drias. (2010) 'Local Search Methods for the Optimal Winner Determination Problem in Combinatorial Auctions. Journal of Mathematical. Modelling and Algorithms, 9(2): 165--180.
[6]
Edmund K. Burke, Matthew Hyde, Graham Kendall, Gabriela Ochoa, Ender Ozcan, and John R. Woodward.(2010), 'A classification of hyper-heuristic Approaches', in International Series in Operations Research and Management Science.
[7]
Edmund K. Burke, Mathew R. Hyde, Graham Kendall, Gabriela Ochoa, Ender Ozcan, and John R. Woodward. (2009), 'Exploring Hyper-heuristic Methodologies with Genetic Programming', in Collaborative Computational Intelligence.
[8]
Edmund K. Burke, Mathew R. Hyde, Graham Kendall, Gabriela Ochoa, Ender Ozcan, and Rong. Qu. (2010), 'Hyper-heuristics: A Survey of the State of the Art'. Technical Report, School of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Nottingham.
[9]
Fujishima Y, Leyton-Brown K, Shoham Y. (1999) 'Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: optimal and approximate approaches', Sixteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp: 48--53.
[10]
Guo Y, Lim A, Rodrigues B, Zhu Y, (2006). 'Heuristics for a bidding problem'. In Computers and Operations Research, vol 33, Issue 8, August 2006, pp: 2179--2188.
[11]
Hoos HH, Boutilier C. (2000), 'Solving combinatorial auctions using stochastic local search', In Proceedings of the 17th national conference on artificial intelligence, pp: 22--29.
[12]
Hoos HH (2002) An Adaptive Noise Mechanism for WalkSAT. In: Proceedings of the 19 th national conference on artificial intelligence AAAI/IAAI 2002, pp 655--660.
[13]
Lassouaoui. M, Boughaci. D (2013), 'A Choice Function Hyper-heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem'. NICSO 2013 pp: 303--314.
[14]
Lau HC, Goh, YG (2002). 'An intelligent brokering system to support multi-agent web-based 4th-party logistics', In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, pp: 54--61.
[15]
Leyton-Brown K, Tennenholtz M, Shoham Y (2000). 'An Algorithm for Multi-Unit Combinatorial Auctions', In Proceedings of the 17th national conference on artificial intelligence, Austin, Games-2000, Bilbao, and ISMP-2000, Atlanta.
[16]
Nisan, N. (2000), 'Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions', In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'00), Minneapolis: ACM SIGecom, ACM Press, October, pp: 1--12.
[17]
Rothkopf, M.H., Pekee, A. and Ronald, M. (1998) 'Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions', In Management Science, vol. 44, No. 8, pp: 1131--1147.
[18]
Sandholm, T(1999). 'Algorithms for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions', In Artificial Intelligence, vol 135, (1-2), pp: 1--54.
[19]
Sandholm T, Suri S, Gilpin A, Levine D. (2001), 'CABoB: a fast optimal algorithm for combinatorial auctions'. In Proceedings of the International joint conferences on artificial intelligence, pp: 1102--1108.
[20]
Sandholm T, Suri S, (2000). 'Improved Optimal Algorithm for Combinatorial Auctions and Generalizations'. In Proceedings of the 17th national conference on artificial intelligence, pp: 90--97.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Stochastic Hyper-Heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem in combinatorial auctions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MEDES '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems
    September 2014
    225 pages
    ISBN:9781450327671
    DOI:10.1145/2668260
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 September 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Choice function
    2. Optimization
    3. Randomness
    4. Stochastic hyper-heuristic
    5. Winner determination problem

    Qualifiers

    • Tutorial
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MEDES '14

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 267 of 682 submissions, 39%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media