[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2661903acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tagging Your Tweets: A Probabilistic Modeling of Hashtag Annotation in Twitter

Published: 03 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The adoption of hashtags in major social networks including Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ is a strong evidence of its importance in facilitating information diffusion and social chatting. To understand the factors (e.g., user interest, posting time and tweet content) that may affect hashtag annotation in Twitter and to capture the implicit relations between latent topics in tweets and their corresponding hashtags, we propose two PLSA-style topic models to model the hashtag annotation behavior in Twitter. Content-Pivoted Model (CPM) assumes that tweet content guides the generation of hashtags while Hashtag-Pivoted Model (HPM) assumes that hashtags guide the generation of tweet content. Both models jointly incorporate user, time, hashtag and tweet content in a probabilistic framework. The PLSA-style models also enable us to verify the impact of social factor on hashtag annotation by introducing social network regularization in the two models. We evaluate the proposed models using perplexity and demonstrate their effectiveness in two applications: retrospective hashtag annotation and related hashtag discovery. Our results show that HPM outperforms CPM by perplexity and both user and time are important factors that affect model performance. In addition, incorporating social network regularization does not improve model performance. Our experimental results also demonstrate the effectiveness of our models in both applications compared with baseline methods.

References

[1]
D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993--1022, 2003.
[2]
D. Davidov, O. Tsur, and A. Rappoport. Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtags and smileys. In COLING, pages 241--249. ACL, 2010.
[3]
Q. Diao, J. Jiang, F. Zhu, and E.-P. Lim. Finding bursty topics from microblogs. In ACL, pages 536--544. ACL, 2012.
[4]
E. Diaz-Aviles, L. Drumond, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and W. Nejdl. Real-time top-n recommendation in social streams. In RecSys, pages 59--66. ACM, 2012.
[5]
W. Feng and J. Wang. Incorporating heterogeneous information for personalized tag recommendation in social tagging systems. In KDD, pages 1276--1284. ACM, 2012.
[6]
F. Godin, V. Slavkovikj, W. De Neve, B. Schrauwen, and R. Van de Walle. Using topic models for twitter hashtag recommendation. In WWW companion, 2013.
[7]
Z. Guan, J. Bu, Q. Mei, C. Chen, and C. Wang. Personalized tag recommendation using graph-based ranking on multi-type interrelated objects. In SIGIR, pages 540--547. ACM, 2009.
[8]
J. Guo, X. Cheng, G. Xu, and X. Zhu. Intent-aware query similarity. In CIKM, pages 259--268. ACM, 2011.
[9]
T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In SIGIR, pages 50--57. ACM, 1999.
[10]
L. Hong, A. Ahmed, S. Gurumurthy, A. J. Smola, and K. Tsioutsiouliklis. Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream. In WWW, pages 769--778. ACM, 2012.
[11]
L. Hong, G. Convertino, and E. H. Chi. Language matters in twitter: A large scale study. In ICWSM, 2011.
[12]
B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1), 2009.
[13]
S. M. Kywe, T.-A. Hoang, E.-P. Lim, and F. Zhu. On recommending hashtags in twitter networks. In SocInfo, pages 337--350. Springer-Verlag, 2012.
[14]
H. Liang, Y. Xu, D. Tjondronegoro, and P. Christen. Time-aware topic recommendation based on micro-blogs. In CIKM, pages 1657--1661. ACM, 2012.
[15]
Z. Ma, A. Sun, and G. Cong. On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in twitter. JASIST, 64(7):1399--1410, 2013.
[16]
A. Mazzia and J. Juett. Suggesting hashtags on twitter.
[17]
M. Naaman, H. Becker, and L. Gravano. Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on twitter. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 62(5):902--918, 2011.
[18]
R. M. Neal and G. E. Hinton. Learning in graphical models. chapter A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants, pages 355--368. MIT Press, 1999.
[19]
W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
[20]
RadiumOne.#mobile hashtag survey, 2013. http://radiumone.com/about/company-resources.html#research.
[21]
D. Ramage, S. T. Dumais, and D. J. Liebling. Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In ICWSM. The AAAI Press, 2010.
[22]
S. Rendle, L. Balby Marinho, A. Nanopoulos, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation. In KDD, pages 727--736. ACM, 2009.
[23]
S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In WSDM, pages 81--90. ACM, 2010.
[24]
D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In WWW, pages 695--704. ACM, 2011.
[25]
S. Sedhai and A. Sun. Hashtag recommendation for hyperlinked tweets. In SIGIR, pages 831--834, 2014.
[26]
P. Symeonidis, A. Nanopoulos, and Y. Manolopoulos. Tag recommendations based on tensor dimensionality reduction. In RecSys, pages 43--50. ACM, 2008.
[27]
O. Tsur and A. Rappoport. What's in a hashtag?: content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. In WSDM, pages 643--652. ACM, 2012.
[28]
X. Wang, F. Wei, X. Liu, M. Zhou, and M. Zhang. Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. In CIKM, pages 1031--1040. ACM, 2011.
[29]
L. Yang, T. Sun, M. Zhang, and Q. Mei. We know what @you#tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption? In WWW, pages 261--270. ACM, 2012.
[30]
Z. Yin, L. Cao, J. Han, C. Zhai, and T. Huang. Geographical topic discovery and comparison. In WWW, pages 247--256. ACM, 2011.
[31]
Q. Yuan, G. Cong, Z. Ma, A. Sun, and N. M. Thalmann. Who, where, when and what: discover spatio-temporal topics for twitter users. In KDD, pages 605--613. ACM, 2013.
[32]
E. Zangerle, W. Gassler, and G. Specht. Recommending#-tags in twitter. In SASWeb, volume 730, pages 67--78.
[33]
W. X. Zhao, J. Jiang, J. Weng, J. He, E.-P. Lim, H. Yan, and X. Li. Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In ECIR, pages 338--349. Springer-Verlag, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)On the Utilization of Emoji Encoding and Data Preprocessing with a Combined CNN-LSTM Framework for Arabic Sentiment AnalysisModelling10.3390/modelling50400765:4(1469-1489)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2022)CultTags—Tags with Contextual RelevanceProceedings of International Conference on Communication and Computational Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-3951-8_63(831-844)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Hashtag Recommendation Methods for Twitter and Sina Weibo: A ReviewFuture Internet10.3390/fi1305012913:5(129)Online publication date: 14-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Tagging Your Tweets: A Probabilistic Modeling of Hashtag Annotation in Twitter

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      November 2014
      2152 pages
      ISBN:9781450325981
      DOI:10.1145/2661829
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 03 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. hashtag
      2. hashtag annotation
      3. topic model
      4. twitter

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CIKM '14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 175 of 838 submissions, 21%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

      Upcoming Conference

      CIKM '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)On the Utilization of Emoji Encoding and Data Preprocessing with a Combined CNN-LSTM Framework for Arabic Sentiment AnalysisModelling10.3390/modelling50400765:4(1469-1489)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
      • (2022)CultTags—Tags with Contextual RelevanceProceedings of International Conference on Communication and Computational Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-3951-8_63(831-844)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2022
      • (2021)Hashtag Recommendation Methods for Twitter and Sina Weibo: A ReviewFuture Internet10.3390/fi1305012913:5(129)Online publication date: 14-May-2021
      • (2021)Hashtag recommendation for short social media texts using word-embeddings and external knowledgeKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-020-01515-763:1(175-198)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
      • (2021)Recommendation system based on semantic scholar mining and topic modeling on conference publicationsSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-020-05397-325:5(3675-3696)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
      • (2021)A Joint Representation Learning Approach for Social Media Tag RecommendationNeural Information Processing10.1007/978-3-030-92273-3_9(100-112)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2021
      • (2020)Item Tagging for Information Retrieval: A Tripartite Graph Neural Network based ApproachProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3397271.3401438(2327-2336)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2020
      • (2020)SHE: Sentiment Hashtag Embedding Through Multitask LearningIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2019.29627187:2(417-424)Online publication date: Apr-2020
      • (2020)Characteristics of Similar-Context Trending Hashtags in Twitter: A Case StudyWeb Services – ICWS 202010.1007/978-3-030-59618-7_10(150-163)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2020
      • (2019)Learning Improved Semantic Representations with Tree-Structured LSTM for Hashtag Recommendation: An Experimental StudyInformation10.3390/info1004012710:4(127)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media