More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

A Design Space for Trust-enabling Interaction Design

Authors:

Arman ArakelyanAuthors Info & Claims

MIDI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Mulitmedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation

Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/2643572.2643578

Published: 24 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to introduce and assess the expressiveness of a design space for trust-enabling interaction design; or in other words aims to assess the extent to which the design space can explain/describe trust-enabling interactions. It starts by situating trust in the domains of Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Interactions.

Then, presents the proposed design space analytical tool. A tool, which serves for moving away from artifact-centered design to an intentional creation of value, i.e. support interaction designers on further reflecting on trust-enabling interactions design values.

These design space's dimensions are rationally derived from the model of Human-computer Trust, which builds on uses perceived trust. This model has been previously validated and was also used as a research lens for providing a greater understanding of how individuals interact with systems, in interaction processes like openness, knowledge sharing, user's privacy awareness, and collaboration.

The article concludes with two examples of application through a comparative inspection of 2 peer-production platforms: Wikipedia and Wordpress. And a reflection on how the proposed analytical tool can be used as a facilitator for supporting trust-enabling interaction design processes.

References

[1]

Abdul-Rahman, A. and Hailes, S. Relying on trust to find reliable information. In Proc. DWACOS'99, (1999).

[2]

Bachrach, M. and Gambetta, D. Trust as Type Detection. In Trust and deception in virtual societies. Castelfranchi C. (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, 1--22.

Digital Library

[3]

Baier, A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 2, 96 (1986), 231--60.

[4]

Camp, L. J. Designing for trust. Trust, Reputation, and Security (2002), 15--29.

Digital Library

[5]

CNET. What Google needs to learn from Buzz backlash. http://www.cnet.com/news/what- google- needs- to- learn- from- buzz- backlash/ (last access: March, 2014).

[6]

Cockton, G. A development framework for value-centred design. Ext. Abstracts CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 1292.

Digital Library

[7]

Constantine, L. L. Trusted interaction: User control and system responsibilities in interaction design for information systems. CAiSE (2006), 20--30.

Digital Library

[8]

Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quartely 13, 3 (1989), 319--340.

Digital Library

[9]

Deutsch, M. (Ed.). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN, 1973.

[10]

Dong, Y. The role of trust in social life. In Trust Modeling and Management in Digital Environments: From Social Concept to System Development. Yan, Z. (Ed.), IGI Global, Finland, 2010, 421--440.

[11]

Choobineh, J., Kini, A. Trust in electronic commerce: Definition and theoretical considerations. In Proc. HICSS, Vol. 4. (1998), 51--61.

Digital Library

[12]

Erikson, E. H. (Ed.). Identity, youth and crisis. Free Press, New York, 1968.

[13]

Fukuyama, F. (Ed.). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York, 1995.

[14]

Gabbay, S. and Leenders, R. A perceptional view of the coleman model of trust. Research report. University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management), 2002.

[15]

Garfinkel, H. A conception of Experiments with "Trust" as a Condition of Stable Concerted actions. Motivation and social Interaction. Ronal Press, New York, 1963.

[16]

Digital agenda for Europe 2010--2020. http://ec.europa.eu/digital- agenda/en.

[17]

Kramer, R. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 50, (1999), Academy of Management, California.

[18]

Lamas, D., Valjataga, T., Laanpere, M., Rogalevits, V., Arakelyan, A., Sousa, S. and Shmorgun, I. Foundations for the Reconceptualization of the e-Textbook. In Proc. ICEL 2013, 510.

[19]

Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C. and Gillespie, N. Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management 32, 6 (2006), 991--1022.

[20]

Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. J. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63, 4 (1985), 967--985.

[21]

Lorenz, B., Sousa, S. and Tomberg, V. Privacy awareness of students and its impact on online learning participation - a case study. In Proc. IFIP WG 3.4 International Conference, OST 2012, Springer Verlag (2013), 189--192.

[22]

Luhmann, N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Gameta D. and Blackwell B. (Eds.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1998.

[23]

MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. and Moran, T. P. Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis. Human--Computer Interaction 6, 3-4 (1991), 201--250.

Digital Library

[24]

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20, 3 (1995), 709--734.

[25]

McKnight, D. and Chervany, N. Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In Trust in cyber-societies: integrating the human and artificial perspectives. Falcone, R., Singh, M. P. and Tan, Y. (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2002, 27--54.

Digital Library

[26]

McKnight, H. and Chervany, N. L. The meaning of trust (Tech. Rep). University of Minnesota - MIS Research Center, 1996.

[27]

Mishra, A. K. Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Kramer R. and Tyler T. (Eds.), SAGE publications Inc., California, 1996, 261--287.

[28]

Norman, D. A. Emotional design. Ubiquity 2004, January (2004), 1--1.

Digital Library

[29]

PCWorld. Google Buzz Criticized for Disclosing Gmail Contacts. http://www.pcworld.com/article/189081/google_buzz_criticized_for_disclosing_gmail_contacts.html (last access: March, 2014).

[30]

Preece, J. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Socialbilty. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2000.

Digital Library

[31]

Preece, J. Etiquette, empathy and trust in communities of practice: Stepping-stones to social capital. Journal of Universal Computer Science 10, 3 (2001), 194--202.

[32]

Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (2009), 13--32.

[33]

Ries, S. Certain trust: a trust model for users and agents. In Proc. SAC '07, ACM Press (2007), 1599--1604.

Digital Library

[34]

Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. The American Psychologist 26, (1971), 443--452.

[35]

Sousa, S., Laanpere, M., Lamas, D. and Tomberg, V. Interrelation between trust and sharing attitudes in distributed personal learning environments: The case study of LePress PLE. In Advances in Web-based Learning. Leung, H., Popescu, E., Cao, Y. Lau, R. and Nejdl, W. (Eds.), Springer Verlag, 2011, 72--81.

Digital Library

[36]

Sousa, S. and Lamas, D. Emerging trust patterns in online communities. In CPSCom 2011, IEEE Computer Society (2011).

Digital Library

[37]

Sousa, S. and Lamas, D. Trust as a leverage for supporting online learning creativity -- a case study. eLearning Papers 30, (2012), 1--10.

[38]

Sousa, S., Lamas, D., and Dias, P. A framework for understanding online learning communities. In Proc. ECEL 2011, Leung, H., Popescu, E., Cao, Y., Lau, R. and Nejdl, W. (Eds.), Academic Publishers (2011), 1000--1004.

[39]

Sousa, S., Lamas, D., and Dias, P. The interrelation between communities, trust and their online social patterns. In Proc. SCA2011, Xia, F. Chen, Z., Pan, G. Yang, L. T. and Ma, J. (Eds.), IEEE Computer Society (2011), 980--986.

Digital Library

[40]

Sousa, S., Lamas, D., and Dias, P. The implications of trust on moderating learner's online interactions - a socio-technical model of trust. In Proc. CSEDU 2012, Martins, M.J., Cordeiro, J., Helfert, M. (Eds.), Vol. 2, SciTePress (2012), 258--264.

[41]

Sousa, S., Lamas, D. and Dias, P. A model of human-computer trust: A key contribution for leveraging trustful interactions. In Proc. CISTI'2014, IEEE Computer Society (2014).

[42]

Tyler, T. R. and Degoey, P. Beyond distrust: 'Getting even' and the need for revenge. In Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Kramer, R. and Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), SAGE publications Inc., California, 1996, 429.

[43]

Vänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. and Wäljas, M. Developing an expert evaluation method for user experience of cross-platform web services. In Proc. MindTrek '09, ACM Press (2009), 162--169.

Digital Library

[44]

Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, G. B. D. and Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quartely 27, 3 (2003), 425--478.

Digital Library

[45]

Weber, L. R. and Carter, A. The social construction of trust, Vol. 33, Springer (2003).

Cited By

Sousa SLamas DCravino JMartins P(2024)Human-Centered Trustworthy Framework: A Human–Computer Interaction PerspectiveComputer10.1109/MC.2023.328756357:3(46-58)Online publication date: Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3287563
Zieglmeier VLehene A(2021)Designing Trustworthy User InterfacesProceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3520495.3520525(182-189)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3520495.3520525
Sousa SLamas DDias P(2016)Value creation through trust in technological-mediated social participationTechnology, Innovation and Education10.1186/s40660-016-0011-72:1Online publication date: 6-Apr-2016
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40660-016-0011-7
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A Design Space for Trust-enabling Interaction Design
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Human-Computer Interaction Design in Product Design
ETCS '09: Proceedings of the 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science - Volume 02

The text from three aspects—a brief summary of the development of Human-Computer Interaction describes of the Human-Computer Interaction is an interaction between people and a machine with a computer, and Man-machine interface is the form and method to ...
Gesture-based interaction design: communication and cognition
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This workshop explores and identifies the cognitive issues fundamental to the design of gestural interactive systems. To achieve this, a dialogue will be facilitated among researchers in the cognitive science of gesture and gestural interaction within ...
Interaction design teaching method design
HCII'11: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction: design and development approaches - Volume Part I

Recently, Interaction Design became popular. We found that, if we want to improve interaction design, an interaction design education method is indispensible. Especially, interaction design usually consists of two or more different fields of discipline. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

MIDI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Mulitmedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation

June 2014

157 pages

ISBN:9781450327794

DOI:10.1145/2643572

General Chair:
Marcin Sikorski
PJWSTK, Warsaw (Poland) and Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk (Poland)
,
Program Chair:
Krzysztof Marasek
PJWSTK, Warsaw (Poland)

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

MIDI '14

MIDI '14: Mulitmedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation International Conference

June 24 - 25, 2014

Warsaw, Poland

Acceptance Rates

MIDI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 33 submissions, 52%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 62 submissions, 56%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
277
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)20
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sousa SLamas DCravino JMartins P(2024)Human-Centered Trustworthy Framework: A Human–Computer Interaction PerspectiveComputer10.1109/MC.2023.328756357:3(46-58)Online publication date: Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3287563
Zieglmeier VLehene A(2021)Designing Trustworthy User InterfacesProceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3520495.3520525(182-189)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3520495.3520525
Sousa SLamas DDias P(2016)Value creation through trust in technological-mediated social participationTechnology, Innovation and Education10.1186/s40660-016-0011-72:1Online publication date: 6-Apr-2016
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40660-016-0011-7
Qundus JWasserman A(2016)Generating Trust in Collaborative Annotation EnvironmentsProceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration Companion10.1145/2962132.2962136(1-4)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2962132.2962136
Sousa SDias PLamas D(2014)A model for Human-computer trust: A key contribution for leveraging trustful interactions2014 9th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)10.1109/CISTI.2014.6876935(1-6)Online publication date: Jun-2014
https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2014.6876935
Arakelyan AShmorgun ISousa S(2014)Incorporating Values into the Design Process: The Case of E-Textbook Development for EstoniaNew Horizons in Web Based Learning10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_30(274-281)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_30

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents