[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2538862.2538890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantitative correlation between ability to compute and student performance in a primary school

Published: 05 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Many studies have provided qualitative arguments for the premise that the ability to compute is fundamental and therefore should be treated at all levels of education. This work presents a quantitative indication of the validity of this premise for primary school students. In order to precisely define what ability a student should have to use a model of computation to compute, this work reports an experimental study that shows a significant correlation between the student's ability to compute and his/her academic performance in a primary school.

References

[1]
Aho, A. V. 2011. Computation and Computational Thinking. Ubiquity 2011, January (Jan. 2011), article no. 1. DOI=10.1145/1922681.1922682.
[2]
Basawapatna, A., Repenning, L. and Lewis, C. 2013. The Simulation Creation Toolkit: An Initial Exploration Into Making Programming Accessible While Preserving Computational Thinking. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado, USA, March 06 - 09, 2013). SIGCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 501--506. DOI=10.1145/2445196.2445346.
[3]
Basawapatna, A, Repenning, A., Koh, K. H. and Nickerson, H. 2013. The Zones of Proximal Flow: Guiding Students Through a Space of Computational Thinking Skills and Challenges. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (San Diego, California, USA, August 12 - 14, 2013). ICER'13. ACM, New York, NY, 67--74. DOI= 10.1145/2493394.2493404.
[4]
Bort, H. and Brylow, D. 2013. CS4 Impact: Measuring Computational Thinking Concepts Present in CS4HS Participant Lesson Plans. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado, USA, March 06 - 09, 2013). SIGCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 427--432. DOI=10.1145/2445196.2445323.
[5]
Gouws, L., Bradshaw, K. and Wentworth, P. 2013. Computational Thinking in Educational Activities. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Canterbury, England, UK, July 01 - 03, 2013). ITiCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 10--15. DOI=10.1145/2462476.2466518.
[6]
Grover, S. and Pea, R. 2013. Computational Thinking in K'12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher 42, 1, 38--43. DOI=10.3102/0013189X12463051.
[7]
Guzdial, M. 2009. Teaching Computing to Everyone. Communications of the ACM 52, 5 (May 2009), 31--33. DOI=10.1145/1506409.1506420.
[8]
Hu, C. 2011. Computational Thinking: what it might mean and what we might do about it. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Darmstadt, Germany, June 27 - 29, 2011). ITiCSE'11. ACM, New York, NY, 223--227. DOI=10.1145/1999747.1999811.
[9]
Lu, J. J. and Fletcher, G. H. L. 2009. Thinking about Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Chattannoga, Tennesse, USA, March 03 - 07, 2009). SIGCSE'09. ACM, New York, NY, 260--264. DOI=10.1145/1508865.1508959.
[10]
Miles, J. and Shevlin, M. 2004. Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers. Sage Publications, London, UK.
[11]
Oliveira, O. L. 2012. Statistical Evidence of the Correlation between Mental Ability to Compute and Student Performance in Undergraduate Courses. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Haifa, Israel, July 03 - 05, 2012). ITiCSE'12. ACM, New York, NY, 111--115. DOI=10.1145/2325296.2325326.
[12]
Papert. S. 1993. Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. 2nd ed. Basic Books, New York, USA.
[13]
Qualls, J. A. and Sherrell, L. B. 2010. Why Computational Thinking Should be Integrated into the Curriculum. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 25, 5 (May 2010), 66--71.
[14]
Settle, A. 2011. The Computational Thinking across the Curriculum Workshop. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Information Technology Education (West Point, New York, USA, October 20--22, 2011). SIGITE'11, ACM, New York, NY, 311--312. DOI=10.1145/2047594.2047678.
[15]
Settle, A., Franke, B., Hansen, R., Spaltro, F., Jurisson, C., Rennert-May, C. and Wildeman, B. 2012. Infusing Computational Thinking into the Middle- and High-School Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Haifa, Israel, July 03 - 05, 2012). ITiCSE'12. ACM, New York, NY, 22--27. DOI=10.1145/2325296.2325306.
[16]
Turing, A. M. 1936. On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. In Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (London, UK, 1936), Ser. 2, vol. 42, 230--265. {Also available on-line at http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/activities/ieg/e-library/sources/tp2-ie.pdf (August 29th, 2013)}.
[17]
Walden, J., Doyle, M., Garns, R and Hart, Z. 2013. An Informatics Perspective on Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Canterbury, England, UK, July 01 - 03, 2013). ITiCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 4--9. DOI=10.1145/2462476.2483797.
[18]
Webb, H. C. and Rosson, M. B. 2013 Using Scaffolded Examples to Teach Computational Thinking Concepts. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado, USA, March 06 - 09, 2013). SIGCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 95--100. DOI=10.1145/2445196.2445227.
[19]
Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S. and Kawamoto, D. C. 2012. The Fairy Performance Assessment: Measuring Computational Thinking in Middle School. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, February29-March 3, 2012). SIGCSE'12. ACM, New York, NY, 215--220. DOI=10.1145/2157136.2157200.
[20]
Wing, J. 2006. Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM 49, 3 (Mar. 2006), 33--35. DOI=10.1145/1118178.1118215.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing the Efficacy of an Accessible Computing Curriculum for Students with Autism Spectrum DisordersMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80200118:2(11)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
  • (2024)The Impact of a Computing Curriculum Accessible to Students with ASD on the Development of Computing ArtifactsKnowledge10.3390/knowledge40100054:1(85-95)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Eye-gaze data to measure students’ attention to and comprehension of computational thinking conceptsInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10041438:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Quantitative correlation between ability to compute and student performance in a primary school

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
    March 2014
    800 pages
    ISBN:9781450326056
    DOI:10.1145/2538862
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 March 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. computational thinking
    2. computing education
    3. empirical research
    4. model of computation
    5. reasoning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGCSE '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCSE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 108 of 274 submissions, 39%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE TS 2025
    The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    February 26 - March 1, 2025
    Pittsburgh , PA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Assessing the Efficacy of an Accessible Computing Curriculum for Students with Autism Spectrum DisordersMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80200118:2(11)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
    • (2024)The Impact of a Computing Curriculum Accessible to Students with ASD on the Development of Computing ArtifactsKnowledge10.3390/knowledge40100054:1(85-95)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Eye-gaze data to measure students’ attention to and comprehension of computational thinking conceptsInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10041438:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
    • (2023)The Effects of an Accessible Computing Curriculum for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343392(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
    • (2021)Mutual Improvement between Teaching Materials and Assessment Tools for K-12 Programming Education2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637257(1-8)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
    • (2018)DecompositionProceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3230977.3230979(124-132)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2018
    • (2017)Evaluating algorithmic thinking ability of primary schoolchildren who learn computer programming2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2017.8190609(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2017
    • (2017)A Scoping Review of Studies on Computational Thinking in K–12 Mathematics ClassroomsDigital Experiences in Mathematics Education10.1007/s40751-017-0038-84:1(48-69)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2017
    • (2016)Empowering All StudentsProceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education10.1145/2839509.2844595(382-387)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2016
    • (2016)Can Computational Thinking help me? A quantitative study of its effects on education2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2016.7757409(1-8)Online publication date: Oct-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media