[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2538862.2538897acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New CS1 pedagogies and curriculum, the same success factors?

Published: 05 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

New CS1 curricula and pedagogies have resulted in many positive outcomes over the last several years including lower fail rates and increased long-term retention. Given these positive outcomes, the question becomes how much do the traditional factors of prior experience and confidence still play a role in students' performance in and attitudes about these courses' Furthermore, given that increasingly recommended collaborative pedagogies (e.g. pair programming) force students to interact with their peers for a large percentage of their work in the class, how much does the confidence of their peers affect their own attitudes and performance? This paper presents a study investigating these questions. We find that prior experience and confidence still predict success, but only for some students. We also find that student confidence levels have little to no impact on the attitudes and performance of their peers.

References

[1]
C. Alvarado and Z. Dodds. Women in CS: An evaluation of three promising practices. In Proc. SIGCSE '10, 2010.
[2]
S. Bergin and R. Reilly. Programming: factors that influence success. SIGCSE Bull., 37(1), Feb. 2005.
[3]
D. R. Bernstein. Comfort and experience with computing: are they the same for women and men? SIGCSE Bull., 23(3), Sept. 1991.
[4]
P. Byrne and G. Lyons. The effect of student attributes on success in programming. SIGCSE Bull., 33(3), June 2001.
[5]
M. Guzdial. Exploring hypotheses about media computation. In Proc. of ICER '13. ACM, 2013.
[6]
D. Hagan and S. Markham. Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? SIGCSE Bull., 32(3), July 2000.
[7]
E. Holden and E. Weeden. The experience factor in early programming education. In Proc. of CITC5 '04. ACM, 2004.
[8]
E. Mazur. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1996.
[9]
C. McDowell and et al. Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Commun. ACM, 49(8), Aug. 2006.
[10]
N. Nagappan and et al. Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. SIGCSE Bull., 35(1), 2003.
[11]
L. Porter, C. Bailey Lee, and B. Simon. Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses. In Proc. of SIGCSE '13, 2013.
[12]
L. Porter and et al. Experience report: a multi-classroom report on the value of peer instruction. In Proc. of ITiCSE '11, 2011.
[13]
L. Porter and B. Simon. Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1. In Proc. of SIGCSE '13, 2013.
[14]
V. Ramalingam, D. LaBelle, and S. Wiedenbeck. Self-efficacy and mental models in learning to program. SIGCSE Bull., 36(3), June 2004.
[15]
L. Rich, H. Perry, and M. Guzdial. A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. SIGCSE Bull., 36(1), 2004.
[16]
N. Rountree, J. Rountree, and A. Robins. Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course. SIGCSE Bull., 34(4), Dec. 2002.
[17]
N. Salleh, E. Mendes, and J. C. Grundy. Empirical studies of pair programming for CS/SE teaching in higher education: A systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 37(4), 2011.
[18]
Simon et al. Predictors of success in a first programming course. In Proc. of ACE '06. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2006.
[19]
A. Tafliovich, J. Campbell, and A. Petersen. A student perspective on prior experience in CS1. In Proc. of SIGCSE '13. ACM, 2013.
[20]
H. G. Taylor and L. C. Mounfield. Exploration of the relationship between prior computing experience and gender on success in college computer science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(4), 1994.
[21]
P. Ventura and B. Ramamurthy. Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required. SIGCSE Bull., 36(1), Mar. 2004.
[22]
B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors. SIGCSE Bull., 33(1), Feb. 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examining Intention to Major in Computer Science: Perceived Potential and ChallengesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630843(1237-1243)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Applying CS0/CS1 Student Success Factors and Outcomes to Biggs' 3P Educational ModelProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630781(1168-1174)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Establishing an Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Student Learning and Success in CS1Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603444(52-54)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
March 2014
800 pages
ISBN:9781450326056
DOI:10.1145/2538862
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 March 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CS1
  2. confidence
  3. gender
  4. pair programming
  5. peer instruction
  6. prior experience

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 108 of 274 submissions, 39%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examining Intention to Major in Computer Science: Perceived Potential and ChallengesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630843(1237-1243)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Applying CS0/CS1 Student Success Factors and Outcomes to Biggs' 3P Educational ModelProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630781(1168-1174)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Establishing an Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Student Learning and Success in CS1Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603444(52-54)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2018)The persistent effect of pre-college computing experience on college CS course gradesACM Inroads10.1145/32105519:2(58-64)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media