[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2513228.2513296acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesracsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance consequences of introducing an internal penalty function to a genetic algorithm for scheduling

Published: 01 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the effects of adding an internal penalty function of variable severity in a genetic algorithm used to design a schedule as opposed to using no penalty function. The use of the penalty function was found to decrease the average number of generations needed to find an optimal solution when used in moderation and to cause premature convergence when used in excess.

References

[1]
Akhshabi, M. 2010. A Genetic Algorithm for Solving a New Mathematical Model of Single Machine Scheduling with Three Criteria. Australian Journal Of Basic & Applied Sciences. 4, 11 (2010) 5564--5570.
[2]
Back, T., Fogel, D. B., Michalewicz, Z. 1997 Handbook of Evolutionary Algorithms. IOP Publishing Ltd., Bristol, UK.
[3]
Bagchi, S., Uckun, S., Miyabe, Y., & Kawamura, K. 1991. Exploring Problem-Specic Recombination Operators for Job-Shop Scheduling. Proc. of the Fourth Intl. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, (1991) 10--17.
[4]
Bierwirth, C., Kropfer, H., Mattfeld, D. & Rixen, I. 1995. Genetic Algorithm Based Scheduling in a Dynamic Manufacturing Environment. IEEE Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, (1995), 439--443.
[5]
Burke, E. K., Newall, J. P., and Weare, R. F. 1998. Initialization strategies and diversity in evolutionary timetabling. Evolutionary Computing. 6, 1 (March 1998), 81--103. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/evco.1998.6.1.81
[6]
Gonzalez, C., & Wainwright, R. 1994. Dynamic Scheduling of Computer Tasks Using Genetic Algorithms. Proc. of the First Intl. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, (1994) 829--833.
[7]
Gunawan, A., Ng, K. M., and Ong, H. L. 2008. A genetic algorithm for the teacher assignment problem for a university in Indonesia. Information and Management Sciences, 19, 1 (Mar 2008), 1--16.
[8]
Hentsch, K., & Kööchel, P. 2011. Job scheduling with forbidden setups and two objectives using genetic algorithms and penalties. Central European Journal Of Operations Research, 19, 3 (2011) 285--298.
[9]
Montana, D., Brinn, M., Moore, S., Bidwell, G. 1998 "Genetic algorithms for complex, real-time scheduling," 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetic, 3 (Oct 1998), 2213--2218.
[10]
Ochoa, G., Mädler-Kron, C., Rodriguez, R., and Jaffe, K. 2005. Assortative mating in genetic algorithms for dynamic problems. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computing (2005), Rothlauf, F., Branke, J., Cagnoni, S., Corne, D. W., and Drechsler, R. (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 617--622. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32003-6_65
[11]
Stejić, Z., Yasufumi, T., and Hirota, K. 2003. Genetic algorithms for a family of image similarity models incorporated in the relevance feedback mechanism. Applied Soft Computing, 2, 4 (Feb. 2003), 306--327. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1568-4946(02)00070-4.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RACS '13: Proceedings of the 2013 Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems
October 2013
529 pages
ISBN:9781450323482
DOI:10.1145/2513228
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. genetic algorithms
  2. negative weights
  3. penalty functions
  4. premature convergence

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

RACS'13
Sponsor:
RACS'13: Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems
October 1 - 4, 2013
Quebec, Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

RACS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 73 of 317 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,581 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 41
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media