[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2506583.2506679acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

ngPhylo: N-Gram Modeled Proteins with Substitution Matrices for Phylogenetic Analysis

Published: 22 September 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Phylogenetic tree constructions are important for understanding evolution and species relatedness. Most methods require a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) to be performed prior to inducing the phylogenetic tree. MSAs, however, are computationally expensive and increasingly error prone as the number of sequences increase, as the average sequence length increases, and as the sequences in the set become more divergent. We introduce a new method called ngPhylo, an n-gram based method that addresses many of the limitations of MSA-based phylogenetic methods, and computes alignment-free phylogenetic analyses on large sets of proteins that also have long sequences. Unlike other methods, we incorporate the use of standard substitution matrices to improve similarity measures between sequences. Our results show that highly similar phylogenies are produced to existing MSA-based methods with less computational resources required.

References

[1]
B. E. Blaisdell. A measure of the similarity of sets of sequences not requiring sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83(14):5155--9, July 1986.
[2]
R. C. Edgar. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(5):1792--7, Jan. 2004.
[3]
J. Felsenstein. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 17(6):368--76, Jan. 1981.
[4]
W. Fitch. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Biology, 20:406--416, 1971.
[5]
e. a. Larkin, M A. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 23(21):2947--8, Nov. 2007.
[6]
P. Puigbò, S. Garcia-Vallvé, and J. O. McInerney. TOPD/FMTS: a new software to compare phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 23(12):1556--8, June 2007.
[7]
e. a. Sievers, Fabian. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Molecular Systems Biology, 7:539, Jan. 2011.
[8]
F. Sievers, D. Dineen, A. Wilm, and D. G. Higgins. Making automated multiple alignments of very large numbers of protein sequences. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 29(8):989--95, Apr. 2013.
[9]
M. A. Steel, D. Penny, and S. Url. Distributions of Tree Comparison Metrics-Some New Results. Systematic Biology, 42(2):126--141, 1993.

Index Terms

  1. ngPhylo: N-Gram Modeled Proteins with Substitution Matrices for Phylogenetic Analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    BCB'13: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedical Informatics
    September 2013
    987 pages
    ISBN:9781450324342
    DOI:10.1145/2506583
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 September 2013

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. n-gram model
    2. phylogeny
    3. sequence analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Tutorial
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    BCB'13
    Sponsor:
    BCB'13: ACM-BCB2013
    September 22 - 25, 2013
    Wshington DC, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    BCB'13 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 148 submissions, 29%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 57
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media