A historical examination of the social factors affecting female participation in computing

[2]

V. L. Almstrum, L. J. Barker, B. B. Owens, E. Adams, W. Aspray, N. B. Dale, W. Dann, A. Lawrence, and L. Schwartzman. Building a sense of history: Narratives and pathways of women computing educators. SIGCSE Bull., 37(4):173--189, Dec. 2005.

[3]

C. Alvarado and Z. Dodds. Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices. In Proceedings of the 41st SIGCSE, pages 57--61. ACM, 2010.

[4]

M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald. Blind Spot: Hidden Biases of Good People. Random House Digital, Inc., 2013.

[5]

M. Barinaga. Surprises across the cultural divide. Science, 263(5152):1468--1470, 1994.

[6]

J. Barsh and L. Yee. Unlocking the full potential of women in the US economy, 2011.

[7]

Y. Benschop and H. Doorewaard. Covered by equality: the gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies, 19(5):787--805, 1998.

[8]

Y. Benschop, J. H. Mills, A. Mills, and J. Tienari. Editorial: Gendering change: The next step. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(1):1--9, 2012.

[9]

L. Blum and C. Frieze. The evolving culture of computing: Similarity is the difference. Frontiers: A J. of Women Studies, 26(1):110--125, 2005.

[10]

A. E. Budden, T. Tregenza, L. W. Aarssen, J. Koricheva, R. Leimu, and C. J. Lortie. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in eco. & evo., 23(1):4--6, 2008.

[11]

T. Camp and D. Gurer. Women in computer science: where have we been and where are we going? In Tech. & Soc., pages 242--244. IEEE, 1999.

[12]

S. M. Campbell. The Premise of Computer Science: Establishing Modern Computing at the University of Toronto (1945--1964). U. of Toronto, 2006.

[13]

S. Cheryan, V. C. Plaut, C. Handron, and L. Hudson. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex roles, pages 1--14, 2013.

[14]

J. M. Cohoon. Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. SIGCSE Bull., 34(2):48--52, June 2002.

[15]

J. M. Cohoon and W. Aspray. A critical review of the research on women's participation in postsecondary computing education. Women & info. tech.: Research on under-representation, pages 137--79, 2006.

[16]

CRA-W. About CRA-W.

[17]

J. Currie Little. The role of women in the history of computing. In Tech. & Soc., pages 202--205. IEEE, 1999.

[18]

N. Ensmenger. The computer boys take over: Computers, programmers, and the politics of technical expertise. MIT Press, 2010.

[19]

B. Ericson. Update from the NCWIT meetings, 2009.

[20]

H. Etzkowitz, C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, B. Uzzi, and J. Alonzo. The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science, pages 51--51, 1994.

[21]

V. Galpin. Women in computing around the world. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2):94--100, 2002.

[22]

D. Gaucher, J. Friesen, and A. C. Kay. Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. J. of personality and social psychology, 101(1):109, 2011.

[23]

J. L. Glass, S. Sassler, Y. Levitte, and K. M. Michelmore. What's so special about STEM? a comparison of women's retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, page sot092, 2013.

[24]

E. F. Gross. Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. J. of App. Dev. Psych., 25(6):633--649, 2004.

[25]

D. Gürer. Pioneering women in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2):175--180, 2002.

[26]

D. Gürer and T. Camp. An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. SIGCSE Bull., 34(2):121--127, June 2002.

[27]

M. Guzdial. Women in CS in Qatar: It's complicated, 2010.

[28]

M. D. Hammond, C. G. Sibley, and N. C. Overall. The allure of sexism: Psychological entitlement fosters women's endorsement of benevolent sexism over time. Soc. Psych. and Personality Sci., page 1948550613506124, 2013.

[29]

M. E. Heilman and V. B. Alcott. What I think you think of me: Women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection. J. of App. Psych., 86(4):574, 2001.

[30]

M. E. Heilman, C. J. Block, and P. Stathatos. The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Acad. of Mgmnt. J., 40(3):603--625, 1997.

[31]

A. B. Institute. About us.

[32]

S. Knobloch-Westerwick, C. J. Glynn, and M. Huge. The matilda effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Sci. Comm., 2013.

[33]

A. N. Kumar. A study of stereotype threat in computer science. ITiCSE '12, pages 273--278, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.

[34]

T. J. Ley and B. H. Hamilton. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science, 322(5907):1472--1474, 2008.

[35]

K. Luker. Salsa dancing into the social sciences: Research in an age of info-glut. HUP, 2008.

[36]

J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press, 2003.

[37]

A. McGettrick, E. Roberts, D. D. Garcia, and C. Stevenson. Rediscovering the passion, beauty, joy and awe: making computing fun again. SIGCSE '08, pages 217--218, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.

[38]

A. McGettrick and Y. Timanovsky. Digest of ACM educational activities. ACM Inroads, 3(2):24--27, 2012.

[39]

C. A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, and J. Handelsman. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. of the National Academy of Sci., 109(41):16474--16479, 2012.

[40]

G. Reinish. A woman engineer's view of 50 years in the profession. In Tech. & Soc., pages 219--222. IEEE, 1999.

[41]

E. S. Roberts, M. Kassianidou, and L. Irani. Encouraging women in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2):84--88, 2002.

[42]

M. W. Rossiter. Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940, volume 1. JHU Press, 1982.

[43]

M. W. Rossiter. The matilda effect in science. Soc. studies of sci., 23(2):325--341, 1993.

[44]

F. Sahraei. Iranian university bans on women causes consternation, 2012.

[45]

H. Shen. Mind the gender gap, 2013.

[46]

R. Shumba, K. Ferguson-Boucher, E. Sweedyk, C. Taylor, G. Franklin, C. Turner, C. Sande, G. Acholonu, R. Bace, and L. Hall. Cybersecurity, women and minorities: Findings and recommendations from a preliminary investigation. In ITiCSE Working Group Reports, ITiCSE -WGR '13, pages 1--14, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

[47]

J. Slonim, S. Scully, and M. McAllister. Outlook on Enrolments in CS in Canadian Universities. Info. and Commu. Tech. Council, 2008.

[48]

C. M. Steele. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6):613--629, June 1997.

[49]

R. E. Steinpreis, K. A. Anders, and D. Ritzke. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex roles, 41(7--8):509--528, 1999.

[50]

C. R. Sugimoto. Global gender disparities in science, 2013.

[51]

F. Trix and C. Psenka. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Soc., 14(2):191--220, 2003.

[52]

M. Van den Brink and L. Stobbe. The support paradox: Overcoming dilemmas in gender equality programs. Scand. J. of Mgmnt., 2013.

[53]

J. D. West, J. Jacquet, M. M. King, S. J. Correll, and C. T. Bergstrom. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. arXiv:1211.1759, 2012.

[54]

D. S. Yeager and G. M. Walton. Social-psychological interventions in education. Rev. of Ed. Research, 81(2):267--301, 2011.

[55]

M. Zuk and S. O'Rourke. Is biology just another pink-collar profession?, 2012.