[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2566486.2567990acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding spatial homophily: the case of peer influence and social selection

Published: 07 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Homophily is a phenomenon observed very frequently in social networks and is related with the inclination of people to be involved with others that exhibit similar characteristics. The roots of homophily can be subtle and are mainly traced back to two mechanisms: (i) social selection and (ii) peer influence. Decomposing the effects of each of these mechanisms requires analysis of longitudinal data. This has been a burden to similar studies in traditional social sciences due to the hardness of collecting such information. However, the proliferation of online social media has enabled the collection of massive amounts of information related with human activities. In this work, we are interested in examining the forces of the above mechanisms in the context of the locations visited by people. For our study, we use a longitudinal dataset collected from Gowalla, a location-based social network (LBSN). LBSNs, unlike other online social media, bond users' online interactions with their activities in real-world, physical locations. Prior work on LBSNs has focused on the influence of geographical constraints on the formation of social ties. On the contrary, in this paper, we perform a microscopic study of the peer influence and social selection mechanisms in LBSNs. Our analysis indicates that while the similarity of friends' spatial trails at a geographically global scale cannot be attributed to peer influence, the latter can explain up to 40% of the geographically localized similarity between friends. Moreover, this percentage depends on the type of locations we examine, and it can be even higher for specific categories (e.g., nightlife spots). Finally, we find that the social selection mechanism, is only triggered by places that exhibit specific network characteristics. We believe that our work can have significant implications on obtaining a deeper understanding of the way that people create friendships, act and move in real space, which can further facilitate and enhance applications such as recommender systems, trip planning and marketing.

References

[1]
A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In ACM KDD, 2008.
[2]
S. Aral, L. Muchnik, and A. Sundararajan. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51):21544--21549, 2009.
[3]
E. Bakshy, J. Hofman, W. Mason, and D. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In ACM WSDM, 2011.
[4]
E. Bakshy, B. Karrer, and L. Adamic. Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. In ACM EC, 2009.
[5]
E. Cho, S. A. Myers, and J. Leskovec. Friendship and mobility: Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In ACM KDD, 2011.
[6]
D. Crandall, D. Cosley, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and S. Suri. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In ACK KDD, 2008.
[7]
J. Cranshaw, E. Toch, J. Hong, A. Kittur, and N. Sadeh. Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In UBICOMP, 2010.
[8]
P. Erd\Hos and A. Rènyi. On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences 5: 17--61, 1960.
[9]
M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In ACM KDD, 1996.
[10]
S. Goel, D. Watts, and D. Goldstein. The structure of online diffusion networks. In ACM EC, 2012.
[11]
G. Kossinets and D. Watts. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. In Science 311:88--90, pages 405--450, 2006.
[12]
G. Kossinets and D. Watts. Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. In American Journal of Sociology, Volume 115, Number 2, pages 405--450, 2009.
[13]
K. Lewis, M. Gonzalez, and J. Kaufman. Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume 109, Number 1, pages 405--450, 2012.
[14]
M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. In Annual Review of Sociology, 27:415--44, 2001.
[15]
S. Myers, C. Zhu, and J. Leskovec. Information diffusion and external influence in networks. In ACM KDD, 2012.
[16]
M. Newman. Mixing patterns in networks. In arXiv:cond-mat/0209450v2 {cond-mat.stat-mech}, 2002.
[17]
K. Pelechrinis and P. Krishnamurthy. Location affiliation networks: Bonding social and spatial information. ECML/PKDD, 2012.
[18]
S. Scellato, A. Noulas, R. Lambiotte, and C. Mascolo. Socio-spatial properties of online location-based social networks. In AAAI ICWSM, 2011.
[19]
S. Scellato, A. Noulas, and C. Mascolo. Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In ACM KDD, 2011.
[20]
J. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, and Z. Yang. Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In ACM KDD, 2009.
[21]
J. Tang, S. Wu, and J. Sun. Confluence: Conformity influence in large social networks. In ACM KDD, 2013.
[22]
D. Wang, D. Pedreschi, C. Song, F. Giannotti, and A. Barabási. Human mobility, social ties, and link prediction. In ACM KDD, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Identifying influential users using homophily-based approach in location-based social networksThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-024-06228-080:13(19091-19126)Online publication date: 25-May-2024
  • (2024)Preference Learning Based on Dynamic Dual-Cognition for Group RecommendationDatabases Theory and Applications10.1007/978-981-96-1242-0_19(250-264)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2024
  • (2023)SoLGR: Social Enhancement Group Recommendation via Light Graph Convolution NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328062911(74828-74838)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Understanding spatial homophily: the case of peer influence and social selection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '14: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web
      April 2014
      926 pages
      ISBN:9781450327442
      DOI:10.1145/2566486

      Sponsors

      • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. homophily
      2. location-based social networks
      3. peer influence
      4. social selection

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WWW '14
      Sponsor:
      • IW3C2

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 645 submissions, 13%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Identifying influential users using homophily-based approach in location-based social networksThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-024-06228-080:13(19091-19126)Online publication date: 25-May-2024
      • (2024)Preference Learning Based on Dynamic Dual-Cognition for Group RecommendationDatabases Theory and Applications10.1007/978-981-96-1242-0_19(250-264)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2024
      • (2023)SoLGR: Social Enhancement Group Recommendation via Light Graph Convolution NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328062911(74828-74838)Online publication date: 2023
      • (2022)Correlation of Road Network Structure and Urban Mobility Intensity: An Exploratory Study Using Geo-Tagged TweetsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1201000712:1(7)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2022
      • (2022)A Measurement-Driven Analysis and Prediction of Content Propagation in the Device-to-Device Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.3219399(1-14)Online publication date: 2022
      • (2022)Social dual-effect driven group modeling for neural group recommendationNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.093481:C(258-269)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
      • (2021)A Network Approach to Revealing Dynamic Succession Processes of Urban Land Use and User ExperienceSustainability10.3390/su13211195513:21(11955)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2021
      • (2021)Mining location based social networks to understand the citizen’s check-in patternsComputing10.1007/s00607-021-01020-xOnline publication date: 5-Oct-2021
      • (2019)Urban Computing Leveraging Location-Based Social Network DataACM Computing Surveys10.1145/330128452:1(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2019
      • (2019)Exploring the Social Learning of Taxi Drivers in Latent Vehicle-to-Vehicle NetworksIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2019.2915228(1-1)Online publication date: 2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media