[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2557500.2557531acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Who have got answers?: growing the pool of answerers in a smart enterprise social QA system

Published: 24 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

On top of an enterprise social platform, we are building a smart social QA system that automatically routes questions to suitable employees who are willing, able, and ready to provide answers. Due to a lack of social QA history (training data) to start with, in this paper, we present an optimization-based approach that recommends both top-matched active (seed) and inactive (prospect) answerers for a given question. Our approach includes three parts. First, it uses a predictive model to find top-ranked seed answerers by their fitness, including their ability and willingness, to answer a question. Second, it uses distance metric learning to discover prospects most similar to the seeds identified in the first step. Third, it uses a constraint-based approach to balance the selection of both seeds and prospects identified in the first two steps. As a result, not only does our solution route questions to top-matched active users, but it also engages inactive users to grow the pool of answerers. Our real-world experiments that routed 114 questions to 684 people identified from 400,000+ employees included 641 prospects (93.7%) and achieved about 70% answering rate with 83% of answers received a lot/full confidence.

References

[1]
Davis, J., Kulis, B., Jain, P., Sra, S. and Dhillon, I., "Information-theoretic metric learning," in Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2007.
[2]
Dror, G., Koren, Y., Maarek, Y., and Szpektor, I., I want to answer, who has a question? Yahoo! Answers recommender system. KDD'11, 1109--1117.
[3]
Ehrlich, K., Lin, C., and Griffiths-Fisher, V., Searching for experts in the enterprise: combining text and social network analysis. Group'07, 117--126.
[4]
Gazan, R. Social Q&A. J. of the Amer. Soc. for Info. Sci. & Tech., Advances in Information Science, 2011.
[5]
Golbeck, J. Robles, C., Edmondson, M., Turner, K. 2011. Predicting Personality from Twitter. In Proc. IEEE SocialCom.
[6]
Guo, J., Xu, S., Bao, S., and Yu, Y., Tapping on the potential of Q&A community by recommending answer providers. CIKM '08, 921--930.
[7]
Guy, I., Zwerdling, N., Ronen, I., Carmel, D., and Uiel, E., Social media recommendation based on people and tags, SIGIR'10, 194--201.
[8]
Horowitz, E., and Kamvar, S. D., The anatomy of a largescale social search engine. WWW'10, 431--440.
[9]
Krishna, V. and Rani, T. On the Classification of Imbalanced Datasets. International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol, 2: 145--148, 2011.
[10]
Liu, Q., and Agichtein, E., Modeling answerer behavior in collaborative question answering systems. ECIR'01, 67--79.
[11]
Liu, X., Croft, W. B., and Koll, M., Finding experts in community-based question-answering services, CIKM'05, 315316.
[12]
Mahmud, J., Zhou, M.X., Maggido, N., and Nichols, J. Recommending Targeted Strangers from Whom to Solicit Information on Social Media. Proc. IUI 2013, 37--48.
[13]
Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., Mittal, M., Hripcsak, G., and Hartmann, B. Design lessons from the fastest Q&A site in the West. CHI '11, 2857--2866.
[14]
Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, K., What do people ask their social networks, and why? A survey study of status message Q&A behavior, CHI'10, 1739--1748.
[15]
Muller, M. Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition? Lurking and contributing in enterprise social media, CSCW'12, 253--256
[16]
Pal, A., Farzan, R., Konstan, J. A., and Kraut, R. E., Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities, UMAP'11, 231--242.
[17]
Pan, Y., Luo, L. Chi, C., and Liao, Q. To answer or not: what What non-QA social activities can tell? CSCW 2013.
[18]
Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., and Booth, R.J. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Erlbaum Publishers, 2001.
[19]
Qu, M., Qiu, G., He, X., Zhang, C., Wu, H., Bu, J., and Chen, C. Probabilistic question recommendation for question answering communities. WWW '09, 1229--1230.
[20]
Richardson, M., and White, R. W., Supporting synchronous social Q&A throughout the question lifecycle, WWW'11, 755--764.
[21]
Sung J., Lee, J. and Lee, U. Booming Up the Long Tails: Discovering Potentially Contributive Users in CommunityBased Question Answering Services. Proc. ICWSM 2013.
[22]
Xing, E., Ng, A., Jordan, M., and Russel, S. Distance metric learning, with application to clustering with side-information. Proc. NIPS' 2002, 505--512.
[23]
Yang, Y., and Pedersen, O.J. A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization. In Proc. ICML, 1997.
[24]
Yarkoni, Tal. Personality in 100,000 words: A largescale analysis of personality and word usage among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality 2000.
[25]
Zhang, J., Ackerman, M. S., Adamic, L., and Nam, K. K., QuME: a mechanism to support expertise finding in online help-seeking communities, Proc. UIST'07, 111--114.
[26]
Zhou, Z. M., Lan, M., Niu, Z. Y., and Yu, Y., Exploiting user profile information for answer ranking in cQA, WWW2012 Companion.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Building Personalized Trust: Discovering What Makes One Trust and Act on Facebook PostsACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/34689774:3(1-28)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2021
  • (2019)Getting virtually personalProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3301275.3308445(i-i)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Trusting Virtual AgentsACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/32320779:2-3(1-36)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Who have got answers?: growing the pool of answerers in a smart enterprise social QA system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IUI '14: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
    February 2014
    386 pages
    ISBN:9781450321846
    DOI:10.1145/2557500
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 February 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. answerer recommendation
    2. question routing
    3. social qa

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IUI'14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    IUI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 46 of 191 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Building Personalized Trust: Discovering What Makes One Trust and Act on Facebook PostsACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/34689774:3(1-28)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2021
    • (2019)Getting virtually personalProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3301275.3308445(i-i)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2019
    • (2019)Trusting Virtual AgentsACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/32320779:2-3(1-36)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2019
    • (2018)A Survey on Expert Recommendation in Community Question AnsweringJournal of Computer Science and Technology10.1007/s11390-018-1845-033:4(625-653)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
    • (2018)Retrieving people: Identifying potential answerers in Community Question‐AnsweringJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2404269:10(1246-1258)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2018
    • (2017)Educational Question Routing in Online Student CommunitiesProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3109859.3109886(47-55)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2017
    • (2017)Confiding in and Listening to Virtual AgentsProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3025171.3025206(275-286)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2017
    • (2017)Identifying and predicting the desire to help in social question and answeringInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2016.05.00153:2(490-504)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
    • (2016)A Comprehensive Survey and Classification of Approaches for Community Question AnsweringACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/293468710:3(1-63)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2016
    • (2015)Utilizing Non-QA Data to Improve Questions Routing for Users with Low QA Activity in CQAProceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 201510.1145/2808797.2809331(129-136)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2015
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media