[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2554850.2555141acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Preventing the diffusion of negative information based on local influence tree

Published: 24 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In the social network, competitive influence spread is the problem of finding positive seed vertices that propagate information so as to minimize the influence spread of negative vertices. However, the existing heuristic methods need to be further improved. Therefore, we devote to prevent the diffusion of negative information under the competitive independent cascade (CIC) model. In this paper, we propose a new way to tackle the competitive influence problem, referred to as local influence tree (LIT). We carry out experiments on the real-world datasets, the experiments have verified the effectiveness of the proposed methods compared to the baseline methods.

References

[1]
S. Bharathi, D. Kempe, M. Salek. Competitive influence maximization in social networks. In Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE), pages 306--311, 2007.
[2]
T. Carnes, C. Nagarajan, S. M. Wild, and A. van Zuylen. Maximizing influence in a competitive social network: a follower's perspective. In ICEC'07, pages 351--360, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[3]
C. Budak, D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In WWW, pages 665--674, 2011.
[4]
A. Borodin, Y. Filmus, J. Oren. Threshold models for competitive influence in social networks. In Proc. 6th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2010), pages 539--550, 2010.
[5]
X. He, G. Song, W. Chen, Q. Jiang. Influence Blocking Maximization in Social Networks under the Competitive Linear Threshold Model. arXiv:1110.4723, 2011.
[6]
M. Kitsak, L. K. Gallos, S. Havlin, F. Liljeros, L. Muchnik, H. E. Stanley, and H. A. Makse. Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks. Jan 2010.
[7]
Prakas, et al. Winner-takes-all: Competing Viruses on fair-play networks. WWW 2012, pages 1037--1046.ACM.
[8]
Beutel, et al. Interacting Viruses on a Network: Can both survive? SIGKDD 2012, pages: 426--434. ACM
[9]
A. Singh, Y. N. Singh. Rumor Spreading and Inoculation of Nodes in Complex Networks. WWW 2012, pages 675--678. ACM.
[10]
High Energy Physics {EB/OL} http://www.arxiv.org/archive/hep, 2003.
[11]
W. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Yang. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2009: 199--208.
[12]
Barthelemy M. Betweeness centrality in large complex network{J}. European Physical Journal B, 2004, 38(1434): 163--168.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Fake News Propagation and Mitigation Techniques: A SurveyPrinciples of Social Networking10.1007/978-981-16-3398-0_16(355-386)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2021

Index Terms

  1. Preventing the diffusion of negative information based on local influence tree

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '14: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 2014
    1890 pages
    ISBN:9781450324694
    DOI:10.1145/2554850
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 March 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. competitive independent cascade model
    2. heuristic strategy
    3. local influence tree
    4. prevent influence spread
    5. social network

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SAC 2014
    Sponsor:
    SAC 2014: Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 24 - 28, 2014
    Gyeongju, Republic of Korea

    Acceptance Rates

    SAC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 218 of 939 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    SAC '25
    The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 31 - April 4, 2025
    Catania , Italy

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Fake News Propagation and Mitigation Techniques: A SurveyPrinciples of Social Networking10.1007/978-981-16-3398-0_16(355-386)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media