[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2424321.2424412acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding the link between social and spatial distance in the crime world

Published: 06 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Individuals frequently have routine daily activities that require commuting between several places, such as their home, work, shopping centres and recreational facilities. According to Crime Pattern Theory, offenders most likely commit opportunistic crimes, including serial and violent crimes, within their Activity Space, that is the space that they visit most frequently during the course of their daily routine activities, since they are aware of the opportunities and risks within these spaces. However, others within the social network of an offender can introduce the offender to new opportunities outside of his Activity Space, a phenomenon that Crime Pattern Theory does not address. This paper explores an important and interesting question about social networks: What is the relation between social and spatial distance of actors? We study this question in the context of crime and co-offending networks to better understand the impact of an offender's social network on the Activity Space of the offender. Our experiments on real-life crime data show that there is a strong correlation between social and spatial distance of offenders: offenders who are socially close are also spatially close.

References

[1]
P. L. Brantingham and P. J. Brantingham. Notes on the geometry of crime, in P. J. Brantingham and P. L. Brantingham, eds., Environmental Criminology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981
[2]
E. W. Burgess. Juvenile delinquency in a small city. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 6: 724--728, 1916.
[3]
M. A. Tayebi and U. Glässer. Investigating Organized Crime Groups: A Social Network Analysis Perspective. In Proc. Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Istanbul, Turkey, 2012.
[4]
A. J. Reiss. Co-offending and criminal careers. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 1988.
[5]
J. M. McGloin et al. Investigating the stability of co-offending and co-offenders among a sample of youthful offenders. Criminology 46 (1), 2008.
[6]
P. L. Brantingham, M. Ester, R. Frank, U. Glässer and M. A. Tayebi. Co-offending Network Mining. In Uffe Kock Wiil (Ed.), Counterterrorism and Open Source Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Social Networks, Vol. 2, Springer, 2011.
[7]
S. Scellato, A. Noulas, and C. Mascolo, Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In Proc. KDD Conference, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[8]
D. Wang, D. Pedreschi, C. Song, F. Giannotti, A.-L Barabasi, Human mobility, social ties, and link prediction, In Proc. KDD Conference, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[9]
M. Felson, Crime and Nature, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.
[10]
B. Snook. Individual Differences in Distance Travelled by Serial Burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 1:53--66, 2004.
[11]
R. Frank. SPORS: A Suspect Recommendation System based on Offenders' Reconstructed Spatial Profile, In Proc. European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC). Odense, Denmark, 2012.
[12]
P. L. Brantingham and P. J. Brantingham. Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 3--28, March 1993.
[13]
J. M. McGloin and H. Nguyen. The Importance of Studying Co-Offending Networks for Criminological Theory and Policy. In Proc. Third Annual Illicit Networks Workshop, Montréal, Québec, October 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Intelligent Automation of Crime Prediction using Data Mining2022 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)10.1109/ISIE51582.2022.9831620(245-252)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
  • (2021)A National Examination of the Spatial Extent and Similarity of Offenders’ Activity Spaces Using Police DataISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1002004710:2(47)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Belief Rule-Based Expert System to Identify the Crime ZonesIntelligent Computing and Optimization10.1007/978-3-030-68154-8_24(237-249)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Understanding the link between social and spatial distance in the crime world

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGSPATIAL '12: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
    November 2012
    642 pages
    ISBN:9781450316910
    DOI:10.1145/2424321

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 November 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. activity space
    2. co-offending network
    3. social distance

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGSPATIAL'12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Intelligent Automation of Crime Prediction using Data Mining2022 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)10.1109/ISIE51582.2022.9831620(245-252)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
    • (2021)A National Examination of the Spatial Extent and Similarity of Offenders’ Activity Spaces Using Police DataISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1002004710:2(47)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2021
    • (2021)Belief Rule-Based Expert System to Identify the Crime ZonesIntelligent Computing and Optimization10.1007/978-3-030-68154-8_24(237-249)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2021
    • (2018)Spatial Patterns of Offender Groups2018 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)10.1109/ISI.2018.8587365(13-18)Online publication date: Nov-2018
    • (2018)Chicago Crime Data Analysis Using PIG in Hadoop2018 Fourth International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN)10.1109/ICRCICN.2018.8718725(242-247)Online publication date: Nov-2018
    • (2016)Personalized crime location predictionEuropean Journal of Applied Mathematics10.1017/S095679251600014027:03(422-450)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2016
    • (2016)Personalized Crime Location PredictionSocial Network Analysis in Predictive Policing10.1007/978-3-319-41492-8_7(99-126)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2016
    • (2015)Learning where to inspect: Location learning for crime prediction2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)10.1109/ISI.2015.7165934(25-30)Online publication date: May-2015
    • (2014)CrimetracerProceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.5555/3191835.3191930(472-480)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2014
    • (2014)Spatially embedded co-offence prediction using supervised learningProceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining10.1145/2623330.2623353(1789-1798)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media