[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2424321.2424408acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An experimental study of open-source cloud platforms for dust storm forecasting

Published: 06 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Cloud computing is becoming a viable computing solution for scientific research and several open-source cloud solutions are available to support scientific studies. However, little has been done to systematically investigate the performance of these solutions in supporting scientific pursuits. Taking dust storm forecasting as an example, we test three popular open-source cloud solutions, namely Eucalyptus, OpenNebula, and CloudStack, on the same hardware and compare against a bare cluster. We find that: (1) compared to the bare cluster, a cloud has about 10% virtualization and management overhead when one virtual machine is used. Overhead increases when more virtual machines are used. Leveraging more virtual resources would not necessarily yield better performance. (2) For computing- and communication-intensive dust storm forecasting, the performance overhead is mainly due to virtualized network rather than virtualized computing resources when more than one virtual machine is involved. (3) Compared to Eucalyptus and CloudStack, OpenNebula provides better support for dust storm forecasting with relatively better performance. The results can provide some insights for scientific community in adopting these open-source cloud solutions.

References

[1]
Foster I. and Kesselman c. 1999. Concept and Architecture. in: The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, I. Foster and C. Kesselman Eds. CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 37--63.
[2]
Armbrust, M. et.al. A view of cloud computing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, 50--58.
[3]
Vecchiola C, Pandey, S., Buyya R. 2009. High-Performance Cloud Computing: A View of Scientific Applications. Proc. Pervasive Systems, Algorithms, and Networks (ISPAN), 10th International Symposium on, 4--16.
[4]
Nurmi, D., Wolski, R., Grzegorczyk, C., Obertelli, G., Soman S., Youseff, L., Zagorodnov, D. 2009. The Eucalyptus Open-Source Cloud-Computing System. Proc. Cluster Computing and the Grid,. CCGRID '09. 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium, 124--131.
[5]
Sotomayor, B., Montero, R. S., Llorente, I. M., Foster, I., 2009. Virtual Infrastructure Management in Private and Hybrid Clouds. Proc. Internet Computing, IEEE. 13(5), 14--22.
[6]
CloudStack, 2012. http://CloudStack.org/
[7]
Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., and Warfield, A. 2003. Xen and the art of virtualization. Proc. The Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. Bolton Landing, NY, USA, October 19--22, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 164--177. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/945445.945462.
[8]
KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), 2010. http://www.linuxkvm.org.
[9]
Hazelhurst, S. 2008. Scientific computing using virtual high-performance computing: a case study using the Amazon elastic computing cloud. Proc. The 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology. ACM, 94--103.
[10]
Walker, E. Benchmarking Amazon EC2 for HP Scientific Computing. 2008. Login, 33(5), 18--23.
[11]
Ostermann. S., Iosup, A., Yigitbasi, M. N., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T., Epema, D. H. J. 2010. A Performance Analysis of EC2 Cloud Computing Services for Scientific Computing. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2010115-131.
[12]
Keahey, K. 2009. Cloud Computing for Science. Proc. the 21st International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. Springer-Verlag, 478.
[13]
Schad, J., Dittrich, J., and Quiané-Ruiz, J. A. 2010. Runtime measurements in the cloud: observing, analyzing, and reducing variance. Proc. VLDB Endow. Vol. 3, No. 1-2, Sep. 460--471.
[14]
Iosup, A., Ostermann, S., Yigitbasi, M. N., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T., Epema, D. H. J. 2008. Performance analysis of cloud computing services for many-tasks scientific computing. IEEE Transaction on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 22, No. 6, 931--945.
[15]
Xie, J., Yang C, Zhou B., Huang Q., 2010. High performance computing for the simulation of dust storms. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, 34(4), 278--290.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Comparative Analysis of Virtualization Methods in Big Data ProcessingSupercomputing Frontiers and Innovations: an International Journal10.14529/jsfi1901076:1(48-79)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2019
  • (2017)A High Performance, Spatiotemporal Statistical Analysis System Based on a Spatiotemporal Cloud PlatformISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi60601656:6(165)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2017
  • (2015)The implications of disk-based RAID and virtualization for write-intensive servicesProceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/2695664.2695982(2288-2291)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGSPATIAL '12: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
November 2012
642 pages
ISBN:9781450316910
DOI:10.1145/2424321

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cloud computing
  2. cluster computing
  3. high performance computing
  4. infrasturce as a service
  5. open-source cloud solutions

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGSPATIAL'12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Comparative Analysis of Virtualization Methods in Big Data ProcessingSupercomputing Frontiers and Innovations: an International Journal10.14529/jsfi1901076:1(48-79)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2019
  • (2017)A High Performance, Spatiotemporal Statistical Analysis System Based on a Spatiotemporal Cloud PlatformISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi60601656:6(165)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2017
  • (2015)The implications of disk-based RAID and virtualization for write-intensive servicesProceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/2695664.2695982(2288-2291)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2015
  • (2015)Reference Architecture and Classification of Technologies, Products and Services for Big Data SystemsBig Data Research10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.0012:4(166-186)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015
  • (2013)Cloud computing architecture, concepts, and characteristicsSpatial Cloud Computing10.1201/b16106-4(19-32)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2013
  • (2013)Open-source cloud computing solutionsSpatial Cloud Computing10.1201/b16106-18(223-240)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2013
  • (2013)Evaluating open-source cloud computing solutions for geosciencesComputers & Geosciences10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.00159(41-52)Online publication date: Sep-2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media