What students want: a study on the role of the supervisor of final works in computing education
Pages 118 - 125
Abstract
At two European universities providing technical and general computing education, we conducted a survey of undergraduate and graduate student experiences with final thesis work. We focused on the needs of students, role of their supervisor, and perception of institutional scaffolding. Learning style as a background variable was measured using the Need for Cognition instrument. From a sample of 44 responses we draw conclusions that inform computing educators about the wished-for approaches and support for final thesis work that seem necessary from the student point-of-view. These include the highlighted need for expert advice, time management issues and significant correlations between the required expert support and need for cognition.
References
[1]
R. Bednarik and P. Fränti. Survival of students with different learning preferences. The 4th Annual Finnish/Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education, Kolin Kolistelut/Koli Calling 2004, pages 121--125, 2004.
[2]
I. Briggs Myers and L. Kirby. Introduction to type: A guide to understanding your results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press (Palo Alto, Calif.), 1993.
[3]
P. Byrne and G. Lyons. The effect of student attributes on success in programming. SIGCSE Bull., 33:49--52, June 2001.
[4]
J. Cacioppo and R. Petty. The need for cognition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 42(1):116, 1982.
[5]
J. Cacioppo, R. Petty, J. Feinstein, and W. Jarvis. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2):197, 1996.
[6]
J. Cacioppo, R. Petty, and C. Kao. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of personality assessment, 48(3):306--307, 1984.
[7]
G. Craswell. This unfathomable thing called supervision: negotiating better working relationships with supervisors. Occasional Paper GS, 96(4), 1996.
[8]
M. de Raadt et al. My students don't learn the way i do. In Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2011), volume 114, pages 105--112. Australian Computer Society, 2011.
[9]
Y. R. Dong. Non-native graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two u.s. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4):369--390, 1998.
[10]
S. Fincher and J. Tenenberg. Using theory to inform capacity-building: Bootstrapping communities of practice in computer science education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4):265--278, October 2006.
[11]
N. Fleming. Teaching and learning styles: Vark strategies. Christchurch: ND Fleming, 2001.
[12]
A. Furhnam. The psychology of behaviour at work: the individual in the organization. Psychology Press, 2005.
[13]
V. C. Galpin, I. D. Sanders, and P.-y. Chen. Learning styles and personality types of computer science students at a south african university. SIGCSE Bull., 39:201--205, June 2007.
[14]
T. F. Hawk and A. J. Shah. Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1):1--19, 2007.
[15]
J. Keefe. Learning style: An overview. Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, pages 1--17, 1979.
[16]
D. Kolb et al. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
[17]
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(1):13--16, 2006.
[18]
I. Moses. Supervision of higher degree students -- problem areas and possible solutions. Higher Education Research & Development, 3(2):153--165, 1984.
[19]
D. O. Myatt. The research supervisor's role, needs, and problems in the communication of technical information. Journal of Chemical Documentation, 1(2):20--26, 1961.
[20]
H. Pashler, M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9:105--119(15), December 2008.
[21]
I. Styles and A. Radloff. The synergistic thesis: Student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1):97--106, 2001.
[22]
L. Thomas, M. Ratcliffe, J. Woodbury, and E. Jarman. Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. SIGCSE Bull., 34:33--37, February 2002.
[23]
J. Whitmore. Coaching for performance: growing people, performance and purpose. Nicholas Brealey, London, 3rd edition, 2009.
[24]
O. Zuber-Skerritt and N. Knight. Problem definition and thesis writing. Higher Education, 15(1):89--103, 1986.
Index Terms
- What students want: a study on the role of the supervisor of final works in computing education
Recommendations
Students Want to Create Apps: Leveraging Computational Thinking to Teach Mobile Software Development
SIGITE '15: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology EducationComputational Thinking (CT) is recognised as one of the fundamental skills of all graduates. Nevertheless, some issues can emerge when trying to introduce CT into schools; for example, teachers might not be willing to add topics to their intensive ...
Empowering All Students: Closing the CS Confidence Gap with an In-School Initiative for Middle School Students
SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science EducationThe important goal of broadening participation in computing has inspired many successful outreach initiatives. Yet many of these initiatives, such as out-of-school activities or innovative new computer science courses for secondary school students, may ...
What Students Want to Have in the Post-Pandemic?: A Study about Computing Science Study Preferences and Mode of Study in Southeast Asia
ICETM '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology ManagementAfter two years of online learning, minor changes happened in some tiny places which we may not always notice. These changes may impact the school management, education arrangement, and curriculum design: what do students expect from their teachers, and ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2012
187 pages
Copyright © 2012 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
- Univ. Eastern Finland: University of Eastern Finland
- Tampere University of Technology
- Univ. Turku: University of Turku
- Aalto University
In-Cooperation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 15 November 2012
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Conference
Koli Calling '12
Sponsor:
- Univ. Eastern Finland
- Univ. Turku
Koli Calling '12: 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
November 15 - 18, 2012
Koli, Finland
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 147Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)8
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in