[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2464576.2482732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Genetic programming enabled evolution of control policies for dynamic stochastic optimal power flow

Published: 06 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the central optimization problems in power grid engineering, building an essential tool for numerous control as well as planning issues. Methods for solving the OPF that mainly treat steady-state situations have been studied extensively, ignoring uncertainties of system variables as well as their volatile behavior. While both the economical as well as well as technical importance of accurate control is high, especially for power flow control in dynamic and uncertain power systems, methods are needed that provide (near-) optimal actions quickly, eliminating issues on convergence speed or robustness of the optimization.
This paper shows an approximate policy-based control approach where optimal actions are derived from policies that are learned offline, but that later provide quick and accurate control actions in volatile situations. These policies are evolved using genetic programming, where multiple and interdependent policies are learned synchronously with simulation-based optimization. Finally, an approach is available for learning fast and robust power flow control policies suitable to highly dynamic power systems such as smart electric grids.

References

[1]
M. Affenzeller, S. Wagner, S. Winkler, and A. Beham. Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming: Modern Concepts and Practical Applications. CRC Press, 2009.
[2]
R. D. Christie. Power systems test case archive; http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/, Mar. 2013.
[3]
S. Ficici and J. Pollack. A game-theoretic approach to the simple coevolutionary algorithm. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI). Springer-Verlag, 2000.
[4]
M. C. Fu. Feature article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 14, 1977.
[5]
D. Hillis. Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3), 1990.
[6]
S. Hutterer, M. Affenzeller, and F. Auinger. Evolutionary algorithm based control policies for flexible optimal power flow over time. In Proceedings of the EvoApplications 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), volume 7835.
[7]
S. Hutterer, F. Auinger, and M. Affenzeller. Evolutionary optimization of multi-agent control strategies for electric vehicle charging. In Companion Publication of the 2012 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference.
[8]
S. Hutterer, F. Auinger, M. Affenzeller, and G. Steinmaurer. Overview: A simulation based metaheuristic optimization approach to optimal power dispatch related to smart electric grids. In Life System Modeling and Intelligent Computing (LNCS 6329), 2010.
[9]
J. R. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. The MIT Press, 1992.
[10]
J. A. Momoh. Toward dynamic stochastic optimal power flow. In J. Si, A. Barto, W. Powell, and D. Wunsch, editors, Handbook of Learning and Approximate Dynamic Programming, pages 561--598. Wiley-Interscience, 2004.
[11]
J. A. Momoh. Electric Power System Applications of Optimization. 2nd Edition, CRC / Taylor & Francis, 2009.
[12]
M. Potter and K. De Jong. A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN III). Springer-Verlag, 1994.
[13]
M. Potter and K. De Jong. Cooperative coevolution: An architecture for evolving coadapted subcomponents. Evolutionary Computation, 8(1), 2000.
[14]
W. B. Powell, H. P. Simao, and B. Bouzaiene-Ayari. Approximate dynamic programming in transportation and logistics: A unified framework. European Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 1:237--284, 2012.
[15]
C. Rosin and R. Belew. New methods for competitive coevolution. Evolutionary Computation, 5(1), 1996.
[16]
H. Wang, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, R. D. Zimmerman, and R. J. Thomas. On computational issues of market-based optimal power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22(3), 2007.
[17]
P. J. Werbos. Adp: Goals, opportunities and principles. In J. Si, A. Barto, W. Powell, and D. Wunsch, editors, Handbook of Learning and Approximate Dynamic Programming, pages 3--44. Wiley-Interscience, 2004.
[18]
P. J. Werbos. Computational intelligence for the smart grid - history, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 6(3), 2011.
[19]
A. J. Wood and B. F. Wollenberg. Power Generation, Operation, and Control, 2nd Edition. Wiley-Interscience, 1996.
[20]
R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sanchez, and D. Gan. Matpower - a matlab power system simulation package; http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/#docs, Mar. 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Simulation-Based Optimization with HeuristicLab: Practical Guidelines and Real-World ApplicationsApplied Simulation and Optimization10.1007/978-3-319-15033-8_1(3-38)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2015

Index Terms

  1. Genetic programming enabled evolution of control policies for dynamic stochastic optimal power flow

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
    July 2013
    1798 pages
    ISBN:9781450319645
    DOI:10.1145/2464576
    • Editor:
    • Christian Blum,
    • General Chair:
    • Enrique Alba
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 July 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. dynamic stochastic optimal power flow
    2. policy learning
    3. simulation optimization

    Qualifiers

    • Tutorial

    Conference

    GECCO '13
    Sponsor:
    GECCO '13: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 6 - 10, 2013
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2015)Simulation-Based Optimization with HeuristicLab: Practical Guidelines and Real-World ApplicationsApplied Simulation and Optimization10.1007/978-3-319-15033-8_1(3-38)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2015

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media