[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2460999.2461029acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An empirical study on investigating the role of KMS in promoting trust within GSD teams

Published: 14 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which KMS usage helps in developing and maintaining trust within GSD project's team members- an area that is very important but has, to date, not been addressed adequately. Design/methodology/approach -- A survey instrument comprising of 7 factors and 35 elements was developed based on tested questions and literature review. Through a web-based survey, data were collected from GSD employees working in different countries that are using KMS for knowledge management. Findings -- The results of the survey revealed that KMS usage is positively related with employee's propensity to trust and cooperative behavior. There exist an indirect positive relationship between KMS and perceived trustworthiness. Further, Leadership support help in promoting the use of KMS for knowledge seeking and contribution within GSD organizations employees. However, the KMS usage is negatively related with monitoring behavior exist within GSD teams. Research limitations/implications -- The number of responses received was rather small since GSD and KMS are both new and emerging disciplines, and not many organizations are formally using KMS for this purpose. Practical implications -- The results of the study suggest that KMS if implemented and used properly helps the GSD organizations in getting the desired benefits of GSD. Further, leaders play an important role in the success of KMS by motivating the employees towards KMS usage. The findings of this study, we hope, will help and facilitate the organizations in making their GSD projects successful. Academics can use the results to build models that further enhance the KMS domain and propose the strategies for improving KMS usage in order to get maximum benefits through KMS.

References

[1]
Damian, D., & Moitra, D. (2006). Global Software Development: How Far Have We Come? IEEE software, 23(5), 17--19.
[2]
John. Noll, Saarah. Beecham and Ita. Richardson. Global Software Development and Collaboration: Barriers and Solutions. 2010. ACM Inroads, pp.66--78.
[3]
Nils. Brede and Darja. Smite. Understanding a Lack of Trust in Global Software Teams: A Multiple-case Study. 2008. Softw. Process Improve. Pract. 2008, 13(3), pp. 217--231.
[4]
Samireh. Jalali, Cigdem. Gencel and Darja. Smite. Trust Dynamics in Global Software Engineering. ESEM'10, September 2010, pp. 16--17 Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.
[5]
Julia. Kotlarsky, Ilan. Oshri. Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems (2005) 14, 37--48.
[6]
Mamoona Humayun, Cui gang. An Empirical Study on Improving Trust among GSD Teams Using KMR. 24th international conference on software engineering and knowledge engineering, July 2012, USA.
[7]
Paivi. Parviainen, Maarit. Tihinen. Knowledge-related challenges and solutions in GSD. Expert Systems a Journal of Knowledge Engineering. 2011.
[8]
Samireh. Jalali, Cigdem. Gencel and Darja. Smite. Trust Dynamics in Global Software Engineering. ESEM'10, September 2010, pp. 16--17 Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.
[9]
Fares. Anwar, Rozilawati. Razali and Ahmad. Kamsuriah. Achieving Effective Communication during requirements Elicitation - A Conceptual Framework. ICSECS. 2011. Part III, CCIS 181, pp. 600--610.
[10]
Julia. Kotlarsky, Paul c. van Fenemaand Lesle P. willcocks. Developing a knowledge-based perspective on coordination: The case of global software projects. Information & Management 45. 2008, pp. 96--108.
[11]
Ani, Al. Ban, Wilensky. H, Redmiles. D, Simmons. E. An Understanding of the Role of Trust in Knowledge Seeking and Acceptance Practices in Distributed Development Teams. ICGSE'11. 2011, pp. 25--34.
[12]
Wei He, Yulin Fang, Kwok-KeeWei. The Role of Trust in Promoting Organizational Knowledge Seeking Using Knowledge Management Systems: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 60(3):526--537, 2009
[13]
Wei. Xiao and Qing-qi. Wei. A Study on Virtual Team Trust Mechanism and Its Construction Strategies. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering. 2008, pp. 315--319.
[14]
Nour. Ali, Sarah. Beechman and Mistrik. Ivan. Architectural Knowledge Management in Global Software Development: A Review. International Conference on Global Software Engineering. 2010, pp.347--352.
[15]
Yuen, Hui. Yum. Overview of the knowledge management in the public sector. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government Workshop on managing Knowledge to Build Trust in Government. 2008.
[16]
G. Koumoutsos and K. Thramboulidis, "A knowledge-based framework for complex, proactive and service-oriented negotiation systems," Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 317--349, 2009.
[17]
Gabriela. Aranda, Aurora. Vizcaíno, José. Luís-Hernández, Ramón. Palacio and Alberto. Morán. Trusty: A Tool to Improve Communication and Collaboration in DSD. A. S. Vivacqua, C. Gutwin, and M. R. S. Borges (Eds.): CRIWG 2011, LNCS 6969, pp. 224--231.
[18]
Ana Cristina. Costa and Neil. Anderson. Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 20(1). 2001, pp. 119--154.
[19]
Wei He, Kwok-Kee Wei. What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and - seeking beliefs. Decision Support Systems 46 (2009) 826--838.
[20]
Kerlinger, F. N. (Ed.). (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). NewYork: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[21]
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation--confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351--370.
[22]
C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (pp. 325--347). NewYork: Praeger.
[23]
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295--336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Using rapid reviews to support software engineering practice: a systematic review and a replication studyEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10545-630:1Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EASE '13: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
April 2013
268 pages
ISBN:9781450318488
DOI:10.1145/2460999
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Centro de Informatica - UFPE: Centro de Informatica - UFPE
  • SBC: Brazilian Computer Society
  • CNPq: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecn
  • CAPES: Brazilian Higher Education Funding Council

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 April 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. global software development
  2. knowledge management
  3. knowledge management system
  4. perceived trustworthiness
  5. propensity to trust
  6. trust

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

EASE '13
Sponsor:
  • Centro de Informatica - UFPE
  • SBC
  • CNPq
  • CAPES

Acceptance Rates

EASE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 31 of 94 submissions, 33%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Using rapid reviews to support software engineering practice: a systematic review and a replication studyEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10545-630:1Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media