[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2445196.2445304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessment of computer science learning in a scratch-based outreach program

Published: 06 March 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Many institutions have created and deployed outreach programs for middle school students with the goal of increasing the number and diversity of students who later pursue careers in computer science. While these programs have been shown to increase interest in computer science, there has been less work on showing whether participants learn computer science content.
We address two questions, one specific, and the other more general: (1) "What computer science did our middle school students learn in our interdisciplinary two-week summer camp?" (2) "How can computer science concepts be assessed in the context of Scratch-based outreach programs"? We address both questions by presenting the design of our summer camp, an overview of our curriculum, our assessment methodology, and our assessment results.
Though the sample size is not statistically significant, the results show that a two-week, interdisciplinary, non-academic summer camp can be effective not only for engaging students, but also for imparting CS content. In just two weeks, with a curriculum not entirely focused on computer science, students displayed competence with event-driven programming, initialization of state, message passing, and say/sound synchronization. We have employed assessment methodologies that avoid written exams, an approach both outreach and classroom-based programs may find useful.

References

[1]
{1} J. C. Adams and A. R. Webster. What do students learn about programming from game, music video, and storytelling projects? In SIGCSE '12, pages 643--648, 2012.
[2]
{G. Aikenhead. Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2):180--188, March 2001.
[3]
{S. Alliance. The stars alliance: A southeastern partnership for diverse participation in computing. NSF STARS Alliance Proposal. http://www.itstars.org/.
[4]
{I. Arroyo et al. Effects of web-based tutoring software on students' math achievement. In AERA, 2004.
[5]
{T. Bell, I. H. Witten, and M. Fellows. Computer Science Unplugged. 2006.
[6]
{B. Boe, C. Hill, M. Len, G. Dreschler, P. Conrad, and D. Franklin. Hairball: Lint-inspired static analysis of scratch projects. In SIGCSE '13, March 2013.
[7]
K. Brennan and M. Resnick. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In AERA 2012, 2012.
[8]
{Q. Burke and Y. B. Kafai. The writers' workshop for youth programmers: digital storytelling with scratch in middle school classrooms. In SIGCSE '12, pages 433--438, 2012.
[9]
{W. Dann, S. Cooper, and R. Pausch. Making the connection: programming with animated small world. ITiCSE, 2000.
[10]
{D. Franklin, P. Conrad, G. Aldana, and S. Hough. Animal tlatoque: attracting middle school students to computing through culturally-relevant themes. In SIGCSE '11.
[11]
{M. Gordon et al. Spaghetti for the main course?: observations on the naturalness of scenario-based programming. In ITiCSE '12, 2012.
[12]
{C. S. Hood and D. J. Hood. Teaching programming and language concepts using legos. In ITiCSE, June 2005.
[13]
{C. Lee. Why we need to re-think race and ethnicity in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(5):3--5, June 2003.
[14]
{C. M. Lewis and N. Shah. Building upon and enriching grade four mathematics standards with programming curriculum. In SIGCSE '12, pages 57--62, 2012.
[15]
{J. Maloney et al. The scratch programming language and environment. Trans. Comput. Educ., 10(4):16:1--16:15, Nov. 2010.
[16]
{O. Meerbaum-Salant et al. Learning computer science concepts with scratch. In ICER '10, pages 69--76, 2010.
[17]
{O. Meerbaum-Salant et al. Habits of programming in scratch. In ITiCSE '11, pages 168--172, 2011.
[18]
{J. Moschkovich. A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2/3), 2002.
[19]
{P. A. G. Sivilotti and S. A. Laugel. Scratching the surface of advanced topics in software engineering: a workshop module for middle school students. In SIGCSE '08, 2008.
[20]
{U. Wolz et al. Computational thinking via interactive journalism in middle school. In SIGCSE, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Student Utilization of Metacognitive Strategies in Solving Dynamic Programming ProblemsProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701888(687-693)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Exploring Computational Thinking Perspectives in Black Communities with Physiological Computing2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00013(27-32)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2023)The Search for Computer Science Concepts in Coding Animated Narratives: Tensions and OpportunitiesJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633123117492961:7(1335-1358)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
March 2013
818 pages
ISBN:9781450318686
DOI:10.1145/2445196
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assessment
  2. diversity
  3. k-12 education
  4. outreach
  5. scratch

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '13
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 111 of 293 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,787 of 5,146 submissions, 35%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Student Utilization of Metacognitive Strategies in Solving Dynamic Programming ProblemsProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701888(687-693)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Exploring Computational Thinking Perspectives in Black Communities with Physiological Computing2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00013(27-32)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2023)The Search for Computer Science Concepts in Coding Animated Narratives: Tensions and OpportunitiesJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633123117492961:7(1335-1358)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
  • (2023)In critical need of research-based instructional strategies and assessment: an investigation of ePCR math lesson plans for middle school studentsJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2023.223290057:2(351-374)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474(1-33)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • (2023)Computing Education Research in SchoolsPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_20(481-520)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Designing from a Novel University Engineering Course as a Model for High School Education2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962450(1-8)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Fourth grade students’ computational thinking in pair programming with ScratchInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.10051133:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Event-driven Programming in Programming EducationACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/342395621:1(1-31)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Computerized adaptive assessment of understanding of programming concepts in primary school childrenComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2021.191446132:4(418-448)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media