[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2325296.2325307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pseudo abstract composition: the case of language concatenation

Published: 03 July 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Composition is a fundamental problem solving heuristic. In computer science, it primarily appears in program design with concrete objects such as language constructs. It also appears in more abstract forms in higher-level courses. One such form is that of language concatenation in the Computational Models course. This concatenation involves the composition of two specifications of infinite sets (source languages) into a third one, and requires both abstraction and non-deterministic conception. In this paper, we illuminate behaviors of advanced high school students, with such composition. Students who encountered difficulties offered pseudo solutions, which enclosed only "surface" features and observations. We orderly display their solutions, discuss them, and offer suggestions for educators to cope with this phenomenon.

References

[1]
Armoni, M. and Gal-Ezer, J. (2006). Introducing non-determinism, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 325--359.
[2]
Armoni M. and Gal-Ezer, (2006). Reduction -- an abstract thinking pattern: the case of the computational models course, SIGCSE'06, 389--394.
[3]
Armoni, M. and Gal-Ezer, J. (2007). Non-determinism: an abstract concept in computer science studies, Computer Science Education, 17(4), 243--262.
[4]
Astrachan, O., Berry, G., Cox, L., and Mitchener, G. (1998). Design patterns: an essential component of CS Curricula. SIGCSE'98, 153--160.
[5]
Hazzan, O. (1999). Reducing abstraction level when learning abstract algebra concepts, Educational Studies in Mathemartics, 40, 71--90.
[6]
Hazzan, O. (2003). How students attempt to reduce abstraction in the learning of mathematics and in the learning of computer science, Computer Science Education 13(2), 95--122.
[7]
Muller, O., Ginat, D., and Haberman, B. (2007). Pattern-oriented instruction and its influence on problem decomposition and solution construction, ITiCSE'07, 151--155.
[8]
Polya, G. (1954). How to Solve It. Princeton University Press.
[9]
Schank, P. K., Linn, C. M., and Clancy, J. M. (1993). Supporting Pascal programming with an on-line template library and case studies, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(6), 1031--1048.
[10]
Schoenfeld, A. E. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics, in Grouws D. A. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 334--370.
[11]
Soloway, E. (1986). Learning to program=learning to construct mechanisms and explanations. Communications of the ACM, 29(9), 1031--1048.
[12]
Sphorer, J., Soloway, E., and Pope, E. (1985). A goal/plan analysis of buggy Pascal programs. Human-Computer Interaction, 1(2), 163--207.
[13]
Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33--35.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Computer Science Education Research in IsraelPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_18(395-420)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2023
  • (2019)Schools (K–12)The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research10.1017/9781108654555.019(547-583)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019
  • (2019)The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research10.1017/9781108654555Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '12: Proceedings of the 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
July 2012
424 pages
ISBN:9781450312462
DOI:10.1145/2325296
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 July 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. abstraction
  2. composition
  3. computational models
  4. concatenation
  5. non-determinism

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 544 of 1,597 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Computer Science Education Research in IsraelPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_18(395-420)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2023
  • (2019)Schools (K–12)The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research10.1017/9781108654555.019(547-583)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019
  • (2019)The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research10.1017/9781108654555Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media