[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318000acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Framespaces: framing of frameworks

Published: 11 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Socio-cultural analysis [18], design practice [20], and philosophy, stretching back at least to Rogoff, Rittle, and Heidegger, all point out that we arrive at different pictures of difficult problems depending on the frames within which we examine them [16]. Yet after all this time, this truism remains difficult to approach. What can we make of these different perspectives? This paper explores how one system, for classroom mathematics education, looks different from experimental, ethnographic, and ethnomethodological frames during the investigation and different again as we try to put the frames into relationship with one another, that is, as we create a framespace. These different frames contend with one another in defining the meaning and the design brief going forward. We coin the term framespace to describe the constituent set of frames and the relationships between them that must be understood to describe the summative results of the project.

References

[1]
Texas Education Agency 2009 {cited Sept. 17th}; Available from: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/.
[2]
Bannon, L. (2011) Reimagining HCI: Towards a more human-centered perspective. ACM Interactions, July, August 2011, 18(4) p.51--57
[3]
Baumer, E. P. S., & Silberman, M. S. (2011). When the Implication is Not to Design (Technology). in CHI, Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM Press
[4]
Blevis, E., & Stolterman, E. (2009). Transcending disciplinary boundaries in interaction design. Interactions Magazine, 16.
[5]
Brown, A. and Campione, J. Psychological Theory and the design of innovative learning environments. In L. Shauble and R. Glaser (Eds.) Innovations in Learning: New environments for education. Lawrence Erlbaum, City, 1996. Pp. 289--325.
[6]
Crabtree, A., T. Rodden, et al. (2009) Ethnography Considered Harmful. in CHI. Boston, MA, USA
[7]
Creswell, J. W. (2002) Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed-Method Approaches, 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
[8]
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. and Borning, A. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Method. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2002.
[9]
Harrison, S., Back, M., & Tatar, D. (2006). "It's Just a Method!": a pedagogical experiment in interdisciplinary design. in DIS, University Park, PA, USA
[10]
Hegedus, S. J. and J. J. Kaput. (2004) An introduction to the profound potential of connected algebra activities: Issues of representation, engagement and pedagogy. in Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Bergen, Norway.
[11]
Jones, J. C. (1992). Design Methods. New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold.
[12]
Kurdziolek, M. (2011) Classroom Resources and Impact on Learning, Doctoral Dissertation, Computer Science, Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA
[13]
Kurdziolek, M. (2007) Educational Technology and Teacher Perceptions: How does the technology fare in the wild?, Masters Thesis, Computer Science, Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA
[14]
Morrison, A., Viller, S., & Mitchell, P. (2010). Ethnography considered useful: situating criticality. In OZCHI. Canberra, Australia
[15]
Nickerson, S. D., C. Nydam, and J. S. Bowers, Linking Algebraic Concepts and Contexts: Every Picture Tells a Story. Mathematics Teaching in Middle School, 2000. 6(2).
[16]
Rittel, H. and M. Webber, Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 1973. 4: p. 155--169.
[17]
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
[18]
Rogoff, B., Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, in Sociocultural Studies of Mind, J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Rio, and A. Alvarez, Editors. 1995, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge: New York, NY.
[19]
Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., et al. (2010). Integration of Technology, Curriculum, and Professional Development for Advancing Middle School Mathematics: Three Large-Scale Studies. AERJ, 47(4).
[20]
Schön, D., Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem Setting in Social Polic, in Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortoney, Editor. 1979, Cambridge University Press: London, UK.
[21]
Stroup, W. M., Learning basics with Calculus. Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 2005. 24(2): p. 179--196.
[22]
Suchman, L. A., Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions 2nd Edition. 2007: Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Tatar, D., The design tensions framework. Human-Computer Interaction, 2007. 22(4): p. 413--451.
[24]
Tatar, D., Lee, J.-S., & Alaloula, N. (2008). Playground Games: A design strategy for supporting and understanding coordinated activity. in DIS, Cape Town, South Africa
[25]
Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., & Hopkins, B. (2008). Scaling Up Innovative Technology-Based Math. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2)

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
June 2012
828 pages
ISBN:9781450312103
DOI:10.1145/2317956
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 June 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. educational technology
  2. ethnography
  3. ethnomethodology
  4. framespaces
  5. frameworks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

DIS '12
Sponsor:
DIS '12: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2012
June 11 - 15, 2012
Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 218
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media