[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2382936.2382990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Network-based classification of recurrent endometrial cancers using high-throughput DNA methylation data

Published: 07 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

DNA methylation, a well-studied mechanism of epigenetic regulation, plays important roles in cancer. Increased levels of global DNA methylation is observed in primary solid tumors including endometrial carcinomas and is generally associated with silencing of tumor suppressor genes. The role of DNA methylation in cancer recurrence after therapeutic intervention is not clear. Here, we developed a novel computational method to analyze whole-genome DNA methylation data for endometrial tumors within the context of a human protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, in order to identify subnetworks as potential epigenetic biomarkers for predicting tumor recurrence. Our method consists of the following steps. First, differentially methylated (DM) genes between recurrent and non-recurrent tumors are identified and mapped onto a human PPI network. Then, a PPI subnetwork consisting of DM genes and genes that are topologically important for connecting the DMs on the PPI network, termed epigenetic connectors (ECs), are extracted using a Steiner-tree based algorithm. Finally, a random-walk based machine learning method is used to propagate the DNA methylation scores from the DMs to the ECs, which enables the ECs to be used as features in a support vector machine classifier for predicting recurrence. Remarkably, we found that while the DMs are not enriched in any cancer-related pathways, the ECs are enriched in many well-known tumorgenesis and metastasis pathways and include known epigenetic regulators. Moreover, combining the DMs and ECs significantly improves the prediction accuracy of cancer recurrence and outperforms several alternative methods. Therefore, the network-based method is effective in identifying gene subnetworks that are crucial both for the understanding and prediction of tumor recurrence.

References

[1]
M.A. Shipp, K. N. Ross, P. Tamayo, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by geneexpression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat Med, 8:68--74, 2002.
[2]
T. Sorlie, C. M. Perou, R. Tibshirani, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98:10869--74, 2001.
[3]
P. Radivojac, K. Peng, W. T. Clark, et al. An integrated approach to inferring gene-disease associations in humans. Proteins, 72:1030--7, 2008.
[4]
T.H. Huang and M. Esteller. Chromatin remodeling in mammary gland differentiation and breast tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2:a004515, 2010.
[5]
M. Kulis and M. Esteller. DNA methylation and cancer. Adv Genet, 70:27--56, 2010.
[6]
K. Dobbin and R. Simon. Sample size determination in microarray experiments for class comparison and prognostic classification. Biostatistics, 6:27--38, 2005.
[7]
L. Ein-Dor, O. Zuk, and E. Domany. Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103:5923--8, 2006.
[8]
J. Li, A. E. Lenferink, Y. Deng, et al. Identification of high-quality cancer prognostic markers and metastasis network modules. Nat Commun, 1:34, 2010.
[9]
M.L. Gatza, Joseph E. Lucas, William T. Barry, et al. A pathway-based classification of human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107:6994--6999, 2010.
[10]
M. Vidal, M. E. Cusick, and A. L. Barabasi. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell, 144:986--98, 2011.
[11]
A.L. Barabasi, N. Gulbahce, and J. Loscalzo. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet, 12:56--68, 2011.
[12]
E. Lee, Han-Yu Chuang, Jong-Won Kim, Trey Ideker, and Doheon Lee. Inferring pathway activity toward precise disease classification. PLoS Comput Biol, 4:e1000217+, 2008.
[13]
A. Keller, C. Backes, A. Gerasch, et al. A novel algorithm for detecting differentially regulated paths based on gene set enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics, 25:2787--94, 2009.
[14]
Y.A. Kim, S. Wuchty, and T. M. Przytycka. Identifying causal genes and dysregulated pathways in complex diseases. PLoS Comput Biol, 7:e1001095, 2011.
[15]
H Y Chuang, E Lee, Y T Liu, D Lee, and T Ideker. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol, 3:140, 2007.
[16]
M. Liu, A. Liberzon, S. W. Kong, et al. Network-based analysis of affected biological processes in type 2 diabetes models. PLoS Genet, 3:e96, 2007.
[17]
T. Hwang, H. Sicotte, Ze Tian, et al. Robust and efficient identification of biomarkers by classifying features on graphs. Bioinformatics, 24:2023--2029, 2008.
[18]
J.H. Hung, T. W. Whitfield, T. H. Yang, et al. Identification of functional modules that correlate with phenotypic difference: the influence of network topology. Genome Biol, 11:R23, 2010.
[19]
I. Ulitsky, A. Krishnamurthy, R. M. Karp, and R. Shamir. DEGAS: de novo discovery of dysregulated pathways in human diseases. PLoS One, 5:e13367, 2010.
[20]
S.A. Chowdhury, R. K. Nibbe, M. R. Chance, and M. Koyuturk. Subnetwork state functions define dys-regulated subnetworks in cancer. J Comput Biol, 18:263--281, 2011.
[21]
L. Geistlinger, G. Csaba, R. Kuffner, N. Mulder, and R. Zimmer. From sets to graphs: towards a realistic enrichment analysis of transcriptomic systems. Bioinformatics, 27:i366--i373, 2011.
[22]
F. Vandin, E. Upfal, and B. J. Raphael. Algorithms for detecting significantly mutated pathways in cancer. RECOMB'10, pages 506--521, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
[23]
P. Dao, K. Wang, C. Collins, et al. Optimally discriminative subnetwork markers predict response to chemotherapy. Bioinformatics, 27:205--213, 2011.
[24]
C.S. Awtrey, M. G. Cadungog, Mario M. Leitao, et al. Surgical resection of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 102:480--8, 2006.
[25]
Y.-W. Huang, J. Luo, Yu-I Weng, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of CIDEA, HAAO and RXFP3 associated with microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol, 117:239--247, 2010.
[26]
T.A. Rauch and G. P. Pfeifer. Dna methylation profiling using the methylated-CpG island recovery assay (MIRA). Methods, 52:213--7, 2010.
[27]
D. Serre, B. H. Lee, and A. H. Ting. MBD-isolated genome sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res, 38:391--9, 2010.
[28]
T. S. Keshava Prasad, Renu Goel, Kumaran Kandasamy, et al. Human protein reference database - 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 37:D767--772, 2009.
[29]
S. Voß. Steiner's problem in graphs: heuristic methods. Discrete Appl Math, 40:45--72, 1992.
[30]
V. J Rayward-Smith. The computation of nearly minimal Steiner trees in graphs. Internat J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech, 14:15--23, 1983.
[31]
H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and J.-Y. Pan. Fast random walk with restart and its applications. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM '06, pages 613--622, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[32]
M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, et al. The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1):10--18, 2009.
[33]
J.R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33:159--74, 1977.
[34]
H.B. Nair, R. P. Perla, N. B. Kirma, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta mediates the protective effects of aromatase induction in the MMTV-Her-2/neu x aromatase double transgenic mice. Hormones and Cancer, 3:26--36, 2012.
[35]
G.E. Konecny, L. Santos, B. Winterhoff, et al. HER2 gene amplification and EGFR expression in a large cohort of surgically staged patients with nonendometrioid (type II) endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer, 100:89--95, 2009.
[36]
B. Sitohy, J. A. Nagy, and H. F. Dvorak. Anti-VEGF/VEGFR therapy for cancer: Reassessing the target. Cancer Research, 72:1909--1914, 2012.
[37]
S.A. Ali, S. K. Zaidi, J. R. Dobson, et al. Transcriptional corepressor TLE1 functions with Runx2 in epigenetic repression of ribosomal RNA genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107:4165--9, 2010.
[38]
F.R. Althaus. Poly(ADP-ribose): a co-regulator of DNA methylation? Oncogene, 24:11--12, 2005.
[39]
P. Caiafa, T. Guastafierro, and M. Zampieri. Epigenetics: poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of PARP-1 regulates genomic methylation patterns. FASEB J, 23:672--8, 2009.
[40]
M.J. Jahid and J. Ruan. Identification of biomarkers in breast cancer metastasis by integrating protein-protein interaction network and gene expression data. BMC Genomics, S5:S8, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)A novel algorithm for network-based prediction of cancer recurrenceGenomics10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.07.005111:1(17-23)Online publication date: Jan-2019
  • (2017)Pathway Enrichment Analysis with NetworksGenes10.3390/genes81002468:10(246)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2017
  • (2016)Identifying Significant Features in Cancer Methylation Data Using Gene Pathway SegmentationCancer Informatics10.4137/CIN.S3985915(CIN.S39859)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2016

Index Terms

  1. Network-based classification of recurrent endometrial cancers using high-throughput DNA methylation data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    BCB '12: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine
    October 2012
    725 pages
    ISBN:9781450316705
    DOI:10.1145/2382936
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 October 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. DNA methylation
    2. Steiner tree
    3. cancer recurrence
    4. classification
    5. protein-protein interaction network
    6. random walk

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    BCB' 12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    BCB '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 33 of 159 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)A novel algorithm for network-based prediction of cancer recurrenceGenomics10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.07.005111:1(17-23)Online publication date: Jan-2019
    • (2017)Pathway Enrichment Analysis with NetworksGenes10.3390/genes81002468:10(246)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2017
    • (2016)Identifying Significant Features in Cancer Methylation Data Using Gene Pathway SegmentationCancer Informatics10.4137/CIN.S3985915(CIN.S39859)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media