[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2381416.2381418acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dictating and editing short texts while driving: distraction and task completion

Published: 30 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-modal automotive dictation editor (codenamed ECOR) used to compose and correct text messages while driving. The goals are to keep driver's distraction minimal while achieving good task completion rates and times as well as acceptance by users. We report test results for a set of 28 native US-English speakers using the system while driving a standard lane-change-test (LCT) car simulator. The dictation editor was tested (1) without any display, (2) with a display showing the full edited text, and (3) with just the "active" part of text being shown. In all cases, the system provided extensive text-to-speech feedback in order to prevent the driver from having to look at the display. In addition, cell phone messaging and GPS destination entry were evaluated as reference tasks. The test subjects were instructed to send text messages containing prescribed semantic information, and were given a list of destinations for the GPS task. The levels of driver distraction (evaluated by car's deviation from an ideal track, reaction times, number of missed lane change signs, eye gaze information etc.) were compared between the 3 ECOR and the 2 reference tasks, and also to undistracted driving. Task completion was measured by the number and quality of messages sent out during a 4 minute LCT ride, and subjective feedback was collected via questionnaires. Results indicate that the eyes-free version keeps the distraction level acceptable while achieving good task completion rate. Both multi-modal versions caused more distraction than the eyes-free version and were comparable to the GPS entry task. For native speakers, the missing display for the eyes-free version did not impact quality of dictated text. By far, the cell phone texting task was the most distracting one. Text composition speed using dictation was faster than cell phone typing.

References

[1]
Barón, A., Green, P.: Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. Technical Report UMTRI-2006-5. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2006.
[2]
Brooke, J.: SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996.
[3]
Bruyas, M. P., Brusque, C., Auriault, A., Tattegrain, H., Aillerie, I., Duraz, M.: Impairment of Lane Change Performance due to Distraction: Effect of Experimental Contexts. Proc. European Conf. on Human Centered Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 2008.
[4]
Harbluk, J. L., Mitroi, J. S., Burns, P. C.: Three Navigation Systems with Three Tasks: Using the Lane-change test to Assess Distraction Demand. Proc. 5th Intl. Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2009.
[5]
Hart, S., Staveland, L.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload, pp. 139--183. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988.
[6]
Hosking, S., Young, K., Regan, M.: The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance. In: I. J. Faulks et al. (Eds.) Distracted driving, pp. 155--187. NSW: Australasian College of Road Safety, 2007.
[7]
Jamson, AH., Westerman, SJ., Hockey, GR., Carsten, OM.: Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an in-vehicle message system interface. Hum Factors. 2004 Winter; 46(4): 625--39.
[8]
Ju, Y. C., Paek, T.: A Voice Search Approach to Replying to SMS Messages in Automobiles. International Speech Communication Association, 2009.
[9]
Labsky, M., Macek, T., Kleindienst, J., Quast, H., Couvreur, C.: In-car Dictation and Driver's Distraction: a Case Study. In: J. Jacko (Ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Towards Mobile and Intelligent Interaction Environments, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6763/2011, pp. 418--425, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011.
[10]
Mattes, S.: The Lane-Change-Task as a Tool for Driver Distraction Evaluation. Proc. Annual Spring Conference of the GFA/ISOES 2003.
[11]
Medenica, Z., Kun, A.: Comparing the Influence of Two User Interfaces for Mobile Radios on Driving Performance, Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Stevenson, Washington, July 9-12, 2007.
[12]
Petzoldt, T., Bär, N., Krems, J. F.: Gender Effects on Lane Change Test Performance. Proc. 5th Intl. Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2009.
[13]
Ranney, T. A. et al.: Measuring Distraction Potential of Operating In-Vehicle Devices. Technical Report DOT HS 811 231. U. S. Dept. of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Dec. 2009.
[14]
Sauro, J.: Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale, http://www.measuringusability.com/sus.php, 2011.
[15]
Shelton, L.: Statement before the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U. S. House of Representatives, May 9, 2001. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/announce/testimony/distractiontestimony.html
[16]
Stutts, J., Reinfurt, D., Staplin, L., Rodgman, E.: The Role of Driver Distraction in Trafic Crashes, May 2001. http://www.aaafoundation.org/pdf/distraction.pdf
[17]
Suhm, B., Myers, B., Waibel, A.: Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces. Proc. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2001.
[18]
Oviatt, S. et al.: Designing the user interface for multimodal speech and pen-based gesture applications: State-of-the-art systems and future research directions. HCI, Vol. 15 (4), p.263--322, 2000.
[19]
Vertanen, K.: Speech and Speech Recognition during Dictation Corrections. Proc. Interspeech 2006.
[20]
Young, K. L., Regan, M., Hammer, M.: Driver Distraction: A Review of the Literature. Monash University Accident Research Centre. Report no. 206, 2003.
[21]
Wang, Y., Chen, Ch., Cao, J., Zhang W.: Measurement of Degradation Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Driving Performance with Driving Simulation, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Chinese Logistics and Transportation Professionals, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Voice+Tactile: Augmenting In-vehicle Voice User Interface with Tactile Touchpad InteractionProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376863(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • (2019)Social car: The research of interaction design on the driver's communication systemConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.513932:6Online publication date: 17-Jan-2019
  • (2014)Long Text Reading in a CarHuman-Computer Interaction. Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_42(440-449)Online publication date: 2014
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Dictating and editing short texts while driving: distraction and task completion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AutomotiveUI '11: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    November 2011
    190 pages
    ISBN:9781450312318
    DOI:10.1145/2381416
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • ICT&S: ICT&S Center, University of Salzburg

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 November 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. automotive dictation and messaging
    2. driving distraction
    3. lane change test
    4. speech recognition

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '11
    Sponsor:
    • ICT&S

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Voice+Tactile: Augmenting In-vehicle Voice User Interface with Tactile Touchpad InteractionProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376863(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Social car: The research of interaction design on the driver's communication systemConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.513932:6Online publication date: 17-Jan-2019
    • (2014)Long Text Reading in a CarHuman-Computer Interaction. Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_42(440-449)Online publication date: 2014
    • (2013)Mostly passive information delivery in a carProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/2516540.2516572(250-253)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2013
    • (2013)Speech-based text correction patterns in noisy environmentProceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-Computer Interaction: interaction modalities and techniques - Volume Part IV10.1007/978-3-642-39330-3_7(59-66)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2013
    • (2012)Impact of word error rate on driving performance while dictating short textsProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/2390256.2390286(179-182)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2012
    • (2012)On the design and evaluation of robust head pose for visual user interfacesProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/2390256.2390281(149-154)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2012
    • (2012)The social carProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/2390256.2390273(107-110)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2012

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media