More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Article

Free access

Dynamic change within workflow systems

Authors:

Clarence Ellis,

Grzegorz RozenbergAuthors Info & Claims

COCS '95: Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems

Pages 10 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/224019.224021

Published: 13 August 1995 Publication History

Abstract

Dynamic change is a large and pervasive unsolved problem which surfaces within office systems as well as within software engineering, manufacturing, and numerous other domains. Procedural changes, performed in an ad hoc manner, can cause inefficiencies, inconsistencies, and catastrophic breakdowns within offices. This paper is concerned with dynamic change to procedures in the context of workflow systems. How can we make workflow systems more flexible and open? We believe that part of the answer lies in the study and solution of the dynamic change problem. In this paper, we use a Petri net formalism to analyze structural change within office procedures. As an example, we define a class of change called “synthetic cut-over change”, and apply our formalism to prove that this class maintains correctness when downsizing occurs.

References

[1]

Bender, E. Workgroup Computing, PC World Magazine, January 1995 issue, pp.225-244.]]

[2]

Bair, J. (Co-editor), Office Automation Systems: Why Some Work and Others Fail, Stanford University Conference Proceedings, Stanford University, Center for Information Technology, 1981.]]

[3]

Bair, J. Contrasting Wovkfiow Models, Proceedings of GroupWare'93, pp. 229-237.]]

[4]

Bracchi, G. and Pernici, B. The Design Requirerice Information Systems, 2, 2, April, 1984, pp. 151- 170.]]

Digital Library

[5]

Bull Corporation, FlowPath Functional Specification, Bull S. A., Paris, France, September, 1992.]]

[6]

Chang, S.K. and Chan W.L. Transformation and Verification of Ojfice Procedures, IEEE Transactions on O~ce Information Systems, Vol. 6, No 2, 1988.]]

[7]

Croft, W. B. and Lefkowitz, L. S. Task Support in an Office System, ACM Trans. O~ce Information Sys 2, 3, July, 1984, pp. 197-212.]]

Digital Library

[8]

Ellis, C., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G., The Modeling of Dynamic Change Within Workfiow Systems, to apper as a technical report.]]

[9]

Fischer, L. and White, T. (eds) New Tools for New Times: The Workfiow Paradigm by Fischer, L. and White, T. (eds) Future Strategies Inc, Alameda, CA. 1994.]]

[10]

Hirschheim, R. A. Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective, John Wiley and Sons, 1985.]]

Digital Library

[11]

Keddara, K., Ellis, C., Rozenberg, G., The Modeling of Dynamic Change Within Workfiow Systems, to apper as a technical report.]]

[12]

Osterweil, L., Automated Support for the Enactment of Rigorously Described Software Processes, Proceeding of the Third International Process Programming Workshop, 1988, pp.122-125. IEEE Computer Society Press.]]

Digital Library

[13]

Reisig W., Petri Nets: An Introduction. EATCS Monographs on Theoretical Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg (1985).]]

Digital Library

[14]

Robinson, M. Design for Unanticipated Use ..., Proceedings of the Third European Conference on CSCW-ECSCW'93, edited by Simone, C. et al., Kluwer Academic Publisher, Sept. 1993.]]

Digital Library

[15]

Suchman, L. A. Office Procedure as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design, ACM Transactions on Office information Systems, 1, 4, October, 1983, pp. 320-328.]]

Digital Library

[16]

Vernadat,F., Leva, A.D., Giolito, P. Organization and Information System Design of Manufacturing Environments: the new M* Approach, Computer- Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 1, No 2, May 1988.]]

[17]

Wainer, J. and Ellis, C. A. Goal Based Models of Collaboration, Collaborative Computing Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, June 1994.]]

Cited By

Bouhamed MChaoui ANouara RDíaz GDembri A(2022)Reducing the number of migrated instances during business process change: A graph rewriting approachJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.06.01334:9(7720-7734)Online publication date: Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.06.013
Ben Fraj IBenDaly Hlaoui YBenAyed L(2021)A reactive system for specifying and running flexible cloud service business processes based on machine learning2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00220(1483-1489)Online publication date: Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00220
Ferilli S(2020)Incremental Declarative Process Mining with WoMan2020 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS)10.1109/EAIS48028.2020.9122700(1-8)Online publication date: May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/EAIS48028.2020.9122700
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Dynamic change in run-mode systems
Dynamic evolution within workflow systems
Dynamic workflow change in PDM systems

Current manufacturing industry requires product data management (PDM) for efficient product development and production. As an important part of effective PDM solutions, workflow management facilitates creating and executing workflow so as to streamline ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

COCS '95: Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems

August 1995

353 pages

ISBN:0897917065

DOI:10.1145/224019

Editors:
Nora Comstock
Comstock Connections, Austin, TX
,
Clarence Ellis
Univ. of Boulder, Boulder, CO

Copyright © 1995 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

IFIP WG 8.4: IFIP WG 8.4
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
IEEE-CS\TCOS: TC on Operating Systems & Application Environments

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 August 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

COOCS95

Sponsor:

IFIP WG 8.4
SIGGROUP
IEEE-CS\TCOS

COOCS95: Conference on Organizational Computing Systems

August 13 - 16, 1995

California, Milpitas, USA

Upcoming Conference

GROUP '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

January 12 - 15, 2025

Hilton Head , SC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

284
Total Citations
View Citations
2,661
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)193
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)42

Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bouhamed MChaoui ANouara RDíaz GDembri A(2022)Reducing the number of migrated instances during business process change: A graph rewriting approachJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.06.01334:9(7720-7734)Online publication date: Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.06.013
Ben Fraj IBenDaly Hlaoui YBenAyed L(2021)A reactive system for specifying and running flexible cloud service business processes based on machine learning2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00220(1483-1489)Online publication date: Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00220
Ferilli S(2020)Incremental Declarative Process Mining with WoMan2020 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS)10.1109/EAIS48028.2020.9122700(1-8)Online publication date: May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/EAIS48028.2020.9122700
Fraj IHlaoui YBenAyed L(2020)A control system for managing the flexibility in BPMN models of cloud service workflows2020 IEEE 13th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD)10.1109/CLOUD49709.2020.00081(537-543)Online publication date: Oct-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD49709.2020.00081
Fu YDrager S(2019)Reconfiguration of Autonomous RoboticsRapid Automation10.4018/978-1-5225-8060-7.ch071(1511-1527)Online publication date: 2019
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8060-7.ch071
Goldstein AJohanndeiter TFrank U(2019)Business process runtime modelsInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-018-0374-217:1(27-64)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10257-018-0374-2
Nahabedian LBraberman VD’ippolito NKramer JUchitel S(2019)Dynamic Reconfiguration of Business ProcessesBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_5(35-51)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_5
Grambow GOberhauser RReichert M(2018)Providing Automated Holistic Process and Knowledge Assistance During Software ModernizationComputer Systems and Software Engineering10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch015(351-395)Online publication date: 2018
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch015
Pradhan AJoshi R(2018)A Taxonomy of Consistency Models in Dynamic Migration of Business ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2017.273541311:3(562-579)Online publication date: 1-May-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2017.2735413
Song WJacobsen H(2018)Static and Dynamic Process ChangeIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2016.253602511:1(215-231)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2016.2536025
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents