[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Dimensions of Concern: A Method to Use Cognitive Dimensions to Evaluate Interfaces

Published: 01 July 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Producing useful and usable software often requires continuous and iterative evaluation. This paper introduces a novel usability evaluation method based on the Cognitive Dimensions of Notations framework. The target of our evaluation is Herbal a suite of tools designed to simplify agent development by providing a high-level language and maintenance-oriented development environment. The method introduced here uncovers dimensions of concern, which are used to measure the usability of Herbal and to identify areas for improvement in the design. In this article, we demonstrate how we used dimensions of concern to effectively evaluate and improve usability, and we discuss ways in which our method can be adapted, extended, and applied to improving the usability of other interactive systems.

References

[1]
Blackwell, A. F. and Green, T. R. G. 2000. A cognitive dimensions questionnaire optimised for users. In Procedings of the 12th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group.
[2]
Blackwell, A. F. and Green, T. R. G. 2003. Notational systems: The cognitive dimensions of notations frameworks. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks, J. M. Carroll Ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 103--133
[3]
Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Edu. Psych. Measure. 20, 37--46.
[4]
Cohen, M. A. 2005. Teaching agent programming using custom environments and Jess. Newslet. Soc. Study Artif. Intell. Simul. Behav. 120, 4.
[5]
Cohen, M. A., Ritter, F. E., and Haynes, S. R. 2010. Applying software engineering to agent development. AI Mag., 31, 2, 25--44.
[6]
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[7]
Haynes, S. R., Cohen, M. A., and Ritter, F. E. 2008. Design patterns for explaining intelligent agents. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.
[8]
Kadoda, G., Stone, R., and Diaper, D. 1999. Desirable features of educational theorem provers: A cognitive dimensions viewpoint. In Collected Papers of the 11th Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, T. R. G. Green, R. Abdullah, and P. Brna Eds., Leeds: Leeds University Press, Leeds, 18--23.
[9]
Ko, A. J., Aung, H. H., and Myers, B. A. 2005. Eliciting design requirements for maintenance-oriented IDEs: A detailed study of corrective and perfective maintenance tasks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering.
[10]
Lehman, J. F., Laird, J. E., and Rosenbloom, P. S. 1996. A gentle introduction to Soar: An architecture for human cognition. In An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 4, D. Scarborough and S. Sternberg Eds., MIT Press.
[11]
Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[12]
Newell, A. Yost, G. R., Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P., and Altmann, E. 1991. Formulating the problem space computational model. In Carnegie Mellon Computer Science: A 25-Year Commemorative, R. F. Rashid Ed., ACM Press-Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 255--293.
[13]
Pew, R. W. and Mavor, A. S. Eds. 2007. Human-System Integration in the System Development Process: A New Look. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
[14]
Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 2nd Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Predicting User Performance and Learning in Human--Computer Interaction with the Herbal CompilerACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/277689122:5(1-26)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 19, Issue 2
July 2012
226 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/2240156
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2012
Accepted: 01 October 2011
Revised: 01 October 2011
Received: 01 March 2010
Published in TOCHI Volume 19, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Cognitive dimensions
  2. evaluating user interfaces
  3. measuring usability
  4. notational systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Predicting User Performance and Learning in Human--Computer Interaction with the Herbal CompilerACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/277689122:5(1-26)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2015

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media