[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187907acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The role of social networks in information diffusion

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Online social networking technologies enable individuals to simultaneously share information with any number of peers. Quantifying the causal effect of these mediums on the dissemination of information requires not only identification of who influences whom, but also of whether individuals would still propagate information in the absence of social signals about that information. We examine the role of social networks in online information diffusion with a large-scale field experiment that randomizes exposure to signals about friends' information sharing among 253 million subjects in situ. Those who are exposed are significantly more likely to spread information, and do so sooner than those who are not exposed. We further examine the relative role of strong and weak ties in information propagation. We show that, although stronger ties are individually more influential, it is the more abundant weak ties who are responsible for the propagation of novel information. This suggests that weak ties may play a more dominant role in the dissemination of information online than currently believed.

References

[1]
L. A. Adamic and E. Adar. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks, 25:211--230, 2001.
[2]
E. Adar and A. Adamic, Lada. Tracking information epidemics in blogspace. In 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, Compiegne University of Technology, France, 2005.
[3]
E. Adar, J. Teevan, and S. T. Dumais. Resonance on the web: web dynamics and revisitation patterns. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, CHI '09, pages 1381--1390, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM Press.
[4]
A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th Internal Conference on Knowledge Discover & Data Mining, pages 7--15, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM Press.
[5]
S. Aral, L. Muchnik, and A. Sundararajan. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106(51):21544--21549, December 2009.
[6]
S. Aral and D. Walker. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57(9):1623--1639, Aug. 2011.
[7]
L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In KDD '06: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 44--54, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[8]
E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: Quantifying influence on twitter. In 3rd ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Hong Kong, 2011. ACM Press.
[9]
E. Bakshy, B. Karrer, and L. Adamic. Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 325--334. ACM, 2009.
[10]
H. R. Bernard, P. Killworth, D. Kronenfeld, and L. Sailer. The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 13:495--517, 1984.
[11]
J. J. Brown and P. H. Reingen. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Research, 14(3):pp. 350--362, 1987.
[12]
R. S. Burt. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
[13]
D. Centola. The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science, 329(5996):1194--1197, September 2010.
[14]
D. Centola and M. Macy. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol., 113(3):702--734, Nov. 2007.
[15]
M. Cha, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, WWW '09, pages 721--730, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[16]
N. A. A. Christakis and J. H. H. Fowler. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med., 357(4):370--379, July 2007.
[17]
S. Fox. The social life of health information. Technical report, Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011.
[18]
E. Gilbert and K. Karahalios. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '09, pages 211--220, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[19]
M. Gladwell. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little Brown, New York, 2000.
[20]
M. Gomez Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and A. Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '10, pages 1019--1028, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[21]
A. Goyal, F. Bonchi, and L. V. Lakshmanan. Learning influence probabilities in social networks. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM '10, pages 241--250, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[22]
M. S. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol., 78(6):1360--1380, May 1973.
[23]
M. S. Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol., 83(6):1420--1443, 1978.
[24]
B. S. Greenberg. Person to person communication in the diffusion of news events. Journalism Quarterly, 41:489--494, 1964.
[25]
D. Gruhl, R. Guha, D. Liben-Nowell, and A. Tomkins. Information diffusion through blogspace. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 491--501. ACM, 2004.
[26]
K. Hampton, L. S. Goulet, L. Rainie, and K. Purcell. Social networking sites and our lives. Technical report, Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011.
[27]
S. Hill, F. Provost, and C. Volinsky. Network-Based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Stat. Sci., 21(2):256--276, May 2006.
[28]
G. Kossinets and D. J. Watts. Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Am. J. Sociol., 115(2):405--450, September 2009.
[29]
K. Lerman and R. Ghosh. Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2010.
[30]
J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. In EC '06: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 228--237, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[31]
D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. Tracing information flow on a global scale using internet chain-letter data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(12):4633, 2008.
[32]
C. F. Manski. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econ. Stud., 60(3):531--42, July 1993.
[33]
A. Marin. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks, 26(4):289--307, Oct. 2004.
[34]
M. McPherson, L. S. Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 27(1):415--444, 2001.
[35]
M. E. J. Newman. Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys. Rev. E, 66(1):016128, Jul 2002.
[36]
J.-P. Onnela and F. Reed-Tsochas. Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(43):18375--18380, 2010.
[37]
J. P. Onnela, J. Saramaki, J. Hyvönen, G. Szabó, D. Lazer, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, and A. L. Barabási. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(18):7332--7336, May 2007.
[38]
K. Purcell, L. Rainie, A. Mitchell, T. Rosenstiel, and K. Olmstead. Understanding the participatory news consumer. Technical report, Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2010.
[39]
C. R. Shalizi and A. C. Thomas. Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 27:211--239, 2011.
[40]
T. Stein, E. Chen, and K. Mangla. Facebook Immune System. In EuroSys Social Network Systems, 2011.
[41]
E. S. Sun, I. Rosenn, C. A. Marlow, and T. M. Lento. Gesundheit! modeling contagion through facebook news feed. In Proceedings of the 3rd Int'l AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA, 2009. AAAI.
[42]
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684):440--442, June 1998.
[43]
S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Who says what to whom on twitter. In ACM Conference on the World Wide Web, Hyderbad, India, 2011. ACM Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Impact of AI on Communication Relationship and Social Dynamics: A qualitative ApproachBulletin of Business and Economics (BBE)10.61506/01.0028313:2(282-289)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • (2024)The Role of Complex Systems in Predictive Analytics for E-Commerce Innovations in Business ManagementSystems10.3390/systems1210041512:10(415)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Emotional and Mental Nuances and Technological Approaches: Optimising Fact-Check Dissemination through Cognitive Reinforcement TechniqueElectronics10.3390/electronics1301024013:1(240)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The role of social networks in information diffusion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
    April 2012
    1078 pages
    ISBN:9781450312295
    DOI:10.1145/2187836
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. causality
    2. social influence
    3. tie strength

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW 2012
    Sponsor:
    • Univ. de Lyon
    WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
    April 16 - 20, 2012
    Lyon, France

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)783
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)124
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Impact of AI on Communication Relationship and Social Dynamics: A qualitative ApproachBulletin of Business and Economics (BBE)10.61506/01.0028313:2(282-289)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2024)The Role of Complex Systems in Predictive Analytics for E-Commerce Innovations in Business ManagementSystems10.3390/systems1210041512:10(415)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Emotional and Mental Nuances and Technological Approaches: Optimising Fact-Check Dissemination through Cognitive Reinforcement TechniqueElectronics10.3390/electronics1301024013:1(240)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Detecting Overlapping Communities Based on Influence-Spreading Matrix and Local Maxima of a Quality FunctionComputation10.3390/computation1204008512:4(85)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Topic Modelling: Going beyond Token OutputsBig Data and Cognitive Computing10.3390/bdcc80500448:5(44)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
    • (2024)A Survey on Event Tracking in Social Media Data StreamsBig Data Mining and Analytics10.26599/BDMA.2023.90200217:1(217-243)Online publication date: Mar-2024
    • (2024)Closeness and belongingness: boosting student engagement in Jakarta universitiesJurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies)10.25139/jsk.v8i3.86868:3(561-572)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Public Response to Federal Electronic Cigarette Regulations Analyzed Using Social Media Data Through Natural Language Processing: Topic Modeling StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/5891926(e58919)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Diffusion of vaccine misinformation in a Taiwanese online community: The role of influencers and echo chambers (Preprint)JMIR Infodemiology10.2196/57951Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Socializing Alone: How Online Homophily Has Undermined Social Cohesion in the USSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4738801Online publication date: 2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media