Article

Free access

Subject-oriented composition rules

Authors:

Vincent KruskalAuthors Info & Claims

OOPSLA '95: Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications

Pages 235 - 250

https://doi.org/10.1145/217838.217864

Published: 17 October 1995 Publication History

PDF eReader

Abstract

Subject-oriented programming supports composition of object-oriented programs or program fragments called subjects. This paper presents an approach to the composition rules used to specify composition details. Rules can be generic, allowing different subrules to be "plugged into" higher-level rules, and they include a means of specifying exceptions to general rules. We give definitions of a number of useful, generic rules, including merge and override, as a first step towards a generally-useful composition rule library. We also outline an object-oriented framework for implementing rules, which we are currently building as part of our support for subject-oriented programming in C++.

References

[1]

Gilad Bracha. The Programming Language Jigsaw: Mixins, Modularity and Multiple Inheritance. PhD thesis, University of Utah, 1992.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Gilad Bracha and Gary Lindstrom. Modularity meets inheritance. In Proceedings qf the 1992 International Conference on Computer Languages, pages 282-290, Oakland, April 1992. IEEE.]]

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

William Cook. A Denotational Semantics qf Inheritance. PhD thesis, Brown Univerisity, 1989.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Margaret A. Ellis and Bjarne Stroustrup. The Annotated C+ + Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1990.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Ira R. Forman, Scott Danforth, and Hari Madduri. Composition of before/after metaclasses in SOM. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 427-439, Portland, Oregon, October 1994. ACM.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison- Wesley, 1994.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

William Harrison and Harold Ossher. Subjectoriented programming (a critique of pure objects). In Proceedings of rhe Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 41 l-428, Washington, D.C., September 1993. ACM.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Jo A. Lawless and Molly M. Miller. Understanding CLOS. Digital Press, 1991.]]

Google Scholar

[9]

David A. Moon. Object-oriented programming with Flavors. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object- Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 1-8. Portland, September 1986. ACM.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

L. R. Nackman and J. J. Barton. Base-class compositions with multiple derivation and virtual bases. In I994 Usenix: C+ + Conference, pages 57-72, Berkeley, Ca., 1994. Usenix Association.]]

Crossref

Google Scholar

[11]

Harold Ossher and William Harrison. Combination of inheritance hierarchies. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 25-40, Vancouver, October 1992. ACM.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

Harold Ossher, William Harrison, Frank Budinsky, and Ian Simmonds. Subject-oriented programming: Supporting decentralized development of objects. In Proceedings of the 7th IBM Corzference on Ohject- Oriented Technology, Santa Clara, CA, July 1994. IBM.]]

Google Scholar

[13]

Harold Ossher, Matthew Kaplan, Alexander Katz, William Harrison, and Vincent Kruskal. Specifying subject-oriented composition. Submitted for publication., 1995.]]

Google Scholar

[14]

Daniel M. Yellin and Robert E. Strom. Interfaces, protocols, and the semi-automatic construction of software adaptors. In Proceedings of Ihe Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 176-l 90, Portland, Oregon, October 1994. ACM.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Chibani MBelattar BBourouis A(2015)Practical benefits of aspect-oriented programming paradigm in discrete event simulationModelling and Simulation in Engineering10.1155/2014/7363592014(47-47)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1155/2014/736359
Kell SIrwin CLopes C(2011)Virtual machines should be invisibleProceedings of the compilation of the co-located workshops on DSM'11, TMC'11, AGERE! 2011, AOOPES'11, NEAT'11, & VMIL'1110.1145/2095050.2095099(289-296)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2095050.2095099
Riehle DArora SLeavens G(2009)Design pattern density definedProceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications10.1145/1640089.1640125(469-480)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1640089.1640125
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Subject-oriented composition rules
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. General programming languages
      1. Language features
        Abstract data types
      2. Language types
        Object oriented languages
2. Theory of computation
  1. Computational complexity and cryptography
    1. Complexity classes

Recommendations

Subject-oriented composition rules

Subject-oriented programming supports composition of object-oriented programs or program fragments called subjects. This paper presents an approach to the composition rules used to specify composition details. Rules can be generic, allowing different ...
Business Rules Integration in BPEL " A Service-Oriented Approach
CEC '05: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology

Business rules change quite often. These changes cannot be handled efficiently by representing business rules embedded in the source code of the business logic. Efficient handling of rules that govern ones business is one factor for success. That is ...
Towards a Distributed Service-Oriented Business Rules System
ECOWS '05: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Web Services

Businesses are changing rapidly and organizations tend to act worldwide and are increasingly becoming distributed over the continents. As a consequence, distributed software systems have to keep track with rapidly changing markets. Business rules ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

OOPSLA '95: Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications

October 1995

496 pages

ISBN:0897917030

DOI:10.1145/217838

Chairman:
Robecca J. Wirfs-Brock
ParcPlace-Digitals, Inc.

ACM SIGPLAN Notices Volume 30, Issue 10
Oct. 17, 1995
493 pages
ISSN:0362-1340
EISSN:1558-1160
DOI:10.1145/217839
Editor:
Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
ParcPlace-Digitalk, Inc.
Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 October 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

OOPSLA95

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN

OOPSLA95: Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications

October 15 - 19, 1995

Texas, Austin, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,244 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

48
Total Citations
View Citations
794
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)121
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Chibani MBelattar BBourouis A(2015)Practical benefits of aspect-oriented programming paradigm in discrete event simulationModelling and Simulation in Engineering10.1155/2014/7363592014(47-47)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1155/2014/736359
Kell SIrwin CLopes C(2011)Virtual machines should be invisibleProceedings of the compilation of the co-located workshops on DSM'11, TMC'11, AGERE! 2011, AOOPES'11, NEAT'11, & VMIL'1110.1145/2095050.2095099(289-296)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2095050.2095099
Riehle DArora SLeavens G(2009)Design pattern density definedProceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications10.1145/1640089.1640125(469-480)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1640089.1640125
Riehle D(2009)Design pattern density definedACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/1639949.164012544:10(469-480)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1639949.1640125
Chern RDe Volder K(2008)The impact of static-dynamic coupling on remodularizationACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/1449955.144978643:10(261-276)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1449955.1449786
Chern RDe Volder KHarris GKiczales GRiehle DBlack A(2008)The impact of static-dynamic coupling on remodularizationProceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems languages and applications10.1145/1449764.1449786(261-276)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1449764.1449786
Sabatucci LGarcia ACacho NCossentino MGaglio S(2008)Conquering Fine-Grained Blends of Design PatternsProceedings of the 10th international conference on Software Reuse: High Confidence Software Reuse in Large Systems10.1007/978-3-540-68073-4_32(294-305)Online publication date: 25-May-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-540-68073-4_32
Seo DLee DMoon KChang JLee JHan C(2005)Schemaless representation of semistructured data and schema constructionDatabase and Expert Systems Applications10.1007/BFb0022048(387-396)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2005
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022048
Pawlak RSeinturier LDuchien LFlorin GLegond-Aubry FMartelli L(2004)JACSoftware—Practice & Experience10.1002/spe.60534:12(1119-1148)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2004
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/spe.605
Nassar M(2003)VUMLProceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1109/ASE.2003.1240341(373-376)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ASE.2003.1240341
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Subject-oriented composition rules

Business Rules Integration in BPEL " A Service-Oriented Approach

Towards a Distributed Service-Oriented Business Rules System