[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2168556.2168644acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Revisiting Russo and Leclerc

Published: 28 March 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit a seminal research contribution by Russo and Leclerc [1994], which identified three stages of the consumer choice process; (1) orientation, (2) evaluation, and (3) verification. Their three stage model broke with previous research favoring two stage models and it disconfirmed the models of planned analysis of choice in favor of an adaptive and constructive process [Wedel and Pieters 2008]. The aim of this paper is to replicate the original study by Russo and Leclerc [1994] to better understand the characteristics of the different stages of the consumer choice process. We argue that such a replication is needed due to the advancements in the technology of eye-tracking during the last 15 years and the detrimental effects of think-aloud protocols. In general, our replication of the research by Russo and Leclerc [1994] confirms the three stage model they suggested by, but we identify some noteworthy differences regarding the time it takes to make a decision and the mean observation time in the three stages.

References

[1]
Duchowski, A. T. 2007. Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice, 2. ed. Springer, London. Andrew Duchowski.
[2]
Henderson, J. M. 2003. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in cognitive sciences 7, 11 (11), 498--504.
[3]
Howard, J. A., and Sheth, J. N. 1969. The Theory of Buyer Behavior, vol. 35. New York: John Wiley.
[4]
Jarbus, A. L., Haigh, B., and Riggs, L. A. 1967. Eye movements and vision. Plenum, New York. A. L. Yarbus; transl. from Russian by B. Haigh; transl. ed. L. A. Riggs.
[5]
Nowlis, S. M., and Simonson, I. 1997. Attribute-task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 34, 2 (05), 205--218. M3: Article.
[6]
Olshavsky, R. W. 1979. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: A replication and extension. Organizational behavior and human performance 24, 3 (12), 300--316.
[7]
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. 1988. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14, 3, 534.
[8]
Payne, J. W. 1976. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational behavior and human performance 16, 2 (8), 366--387.
[9]
Rayner, K. 1978. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological bulletin 85, 618--660. Accession Number: 1978301340. Peer Reviewed: No. Publication Type: journal article. Language: English. Update Code: 197801. Sequence No: 1978-3-1340.
[10]
Russo, J. E., and Leclerc, F. 1994. An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research 21(2), 274--290.
[11]
Russo, J. E., and Rosen, L. D. 1975. Eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory & cognition 3, 3, 267--276. PT: J.
[12]
Svenson, O. 1979. Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational behavior and human performance 23, 1, 86--112.
[13]
Wedel, M., and Pieters, R. 2008. Visual marketing: from attention to action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ETRA '12: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
March 2012
420 pages
ISBN:9781450312219
DOI:10.1145/2168556
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 March 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. choice processes
  2. eye-fixations
  3. stages

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ETRA '12
ETRA '12: Eye Tracking Research and Applications
March 28 - 30, 2012
California, Santa Barbara

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 137 submissions, 50%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 166
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media