[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2148131.2148186acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Process pad: a low-cost multi-touch platform to facilitate multimodal documentation of complex learning

Published: 19 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

This paper introduces Process Pad, an interactive, low-cost multi-touch tabletop platform designed to capture students' thought process and facilitate their explanations. Process Pad is designed to help students improve their thinking skills and meta-cognition in various subjects. The system is intended to dynamically externalize how a student arrives at the final answer. Process Pad enables the documentation of students' think-aloud narratives that would otherwise be tacit. Our focus is on identifying and understanding key themes in creating opportunities for students to externalize and represent their thought process using multimodal data. From our user observations, we gleaned four design perspectives as essential criteria based upon which we form our design decisions: flexibility, tangibility, collaboration and affordability. Our initial results show that for many users explaining their reasoning or problem-solving procedure is a challenging activity in itself, and for learners to be able to deepen their understanding by narrating or re-enacting a process there would be many intervening steps. To address these challenges we designed scaffolding activities, which made use of the system's affordances to improve students' explanation skills.

References

[1]
Abrahamson, D. Embodied Design: Constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70 (1), (2009), 27--47
[2]
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget's Constructivism, Papert's Constructionism: What's the difference? Paper presented at Constructivism: uses and perspectives in education.
[3]
Aleven, V. A., & Koedinger, K. R. An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science 26, (2002), 147--179.
[4]
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 4 (2003), 774--783.
[5]
Chi, M. Self-explaining expository texts: the dual processes of generating inferences and repairing inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 2000, 161--238.
[6]
Corcoran, A, C. Dershimer, E, L. Tichenor, M, S. A Teacher's Guide to Alternative Assessment Taking the First Steps. The Clearing House 77, 5 (2004), 213--216.
[7]
Cunningham, D., & Duffy, T. Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. Simon & Shuster Macmillan, New York, 1996, 170--198.
[8]
Eden, H., & Fischer, G. The Envisionment and Discovery Collaboratory (EDC). Center for Lifelong Learning and design (L3D)
[9]
Gardner, H. The Disciplined Mind. Penguin Books, New York, 1999.
[10]
Gülbahar, Y. & Tinmaz, H. Implementing Project-Based Learning And E-Portfolio Assessment In an Undergraduate Course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38, 3 (2006), 309--327.
[11]
Han, J. Y. Low-Cost Multi-Touch Sensing through Frustrated Total Internal Reflection. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM Press (2005).
[12]
Kyei-Blankson, L. Enhancing Student Learning in a Graduate Research and Statistics Course with Clickers. Educause Quarterly 32, (2009). Retrieved May, 2011 from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/EnhancingStudentLearninginaGra/192963
[13]
Mazalek, A., Reynolds, M., and Davenport, G. TViews: An Extensible Architecture for Multiuser Digital Media Tables, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 5 (2006), 47--55.
[14]
Raffle, H., Vaucelle, C., and Wang, R. Jabberstamp: embedding sound and voice in traditional drawings. In Proc. IDC 2007, ACM Press (2007).
[15]
Renkl, A. Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science 21, 1(1997), 1--29.
[16]
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology 23, (1998), 90--108.
[17]
Shute, V, J. Jeong, A, C. Spector, M, J. Seel, N, M & Johnson, T, E. Model-Based Methods for Assessment, Learning, and Instruction: Innovative Educational Technology at FSU. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook 34, Part I (2009), 61--79.
[18]
Smith, J, P, diSessa, A, A, Roschell, J. Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3, 2 (1993--1994), 115--163.
[19]
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P. and Melkonian, D. K. Explain to your partner': teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education 39, 1 (2009), 49--70.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Meta-Analysis of Tangible Learning Studies from the TEI ConferenceProceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3490149.3501313(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2022

Index Terms

  1. Process pad: a low-cost multi-touch platform to facilitate multimodal documentation of complex learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '12: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction
        February 2012
        413 pages
        ISBN:9781450311748
        DOI:10.1145/2148131
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 19 February 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. design rationale
        2. scaffolding
        3. self-explanation
        4. tangible interaction embodied and embedded learning

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        TEI'12
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

        Upcoming Conference

        TEI '25

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2022)A Meta-Analysis of Tangible Learning Studies from the TEI ConferenceProceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3490149.3501313(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2022

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media